search for: lapre

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "lapre".

Did you mean: lanre
2011 Mar 24
0
[LLVMdev] Reversing a function's CFG?
...//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// / Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:52:40 -0400 From: "Justin M. LaPre" <justin at lapre.com> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Reversing a function's CFG? To: joshuawarner32 at gmail.com Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Message-ID: <5B806BA1-94DB-4EF0-B526-511F6EDFB28B at gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Mar 23, 2011, at 12:2...
2012 Jan 19
1
RApache installation problems
Hi all I was trying to isntall RApache last week but ran into strnge problems that no one else seems to be experiencing. At least I couldn't find anything after extensive googling. First off, the machine I'm installing on looks like this: Dell Optiplex 745 32 bit 2GB RAM Fedora 15 httpd -v Server version: Apache/2.2.21 (Unix) Server built: Sep 13 2011 13:46:23 R: R-2.14.0-3.fc15.i686
2011 May 06
1
[LLVMdev] ReplaceInstWithInst appears to invalidate BB iterator?
Hello, I have a call to ReplaceInstWithInst(Instruction *From, Instruction *To) inside of a for loop iterating through a BasicBlock::iterator. On the very next pass after I replace the instruction, the iterator appears to be invalidated. Is this supposed to happen or am I doing something silly? Is there a more appropriate way to do this? Thanks, -Justin
2011 May 07
1
[LLVMdev] ReplaceInstWithInst appears to invalidate BB iterator?
On May 7, 2011, at 1:00 PM, llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: > > Hi Justin, > >> I have a call to ReplaceInstWithInst(Instruction *From, Instruction *To) inside of a for loop iterating through a BasicBlock::iterator. On the very next pass after I replace the instruction, the iterator appears to be invalidated. Is this supposed to happen or am I doing something silly? Is
2011 Mar 18
3
[LLVMdev] Reversing a function's CFG?
Hello, I was wondering if there was a quick way to reverse a function's CFG and, in turn, all basic blocks within it. Assuming all variables are globals, is there a quick way to generate a function's reversal? I highly doubt such functionality exists but I figured it was worth asking. I'm trying to develop an "undo function" generator pass that would be able to restore