search for: lapace

dear experts I'd like to ask you, probably on behalf all of us who try to use AMD's ACML for performance optimisation a question. There seem to be problem when these two, R and ACML are coupled, described here: http://devgurus.amd.com/message/1255852#1255852 I'd like to ask, while not being a programmer/developer, how incorrect and dangerous this might be? maybe such a setup must

Has anyone gotten lapack to work on centos 7? If so, how? Most recently, I installed lapace-devel and let yum bring in what it wanted. Whenever I try to link, I get a long list of undefined references ending with /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.8.5/../../../../lib64/liblapacke.so: undefined reference to `dgeevx_' [hennebry at localhost test]$ nm -D /usr/lib64/libblas.so | grep dg...

Hi, I am trying to compile R-2.1.1 on MacOSX 10.3.9, but the make is failing (I am building it without all the aqua stuff): ./configure --enable-R-shlib --with-lapac make .... Snip ..... gcc -dynamiclib -L/sw/lib -L/usr/local/lib -install_name /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/2.1.1/Resources/lib/libRlapack.dyli b -o libRlapack.dylib dlamc.lo dlapack0.lo dlapack1.lo dlapack2.lo

On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 1:24 PM Michael Hennebry < hennebry at web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu> wrote: > Has anyone gotten lapack to work on centos 7? > If so, how? > > Most recently, I installed lapace-devel and let yum bring in what it > wanted. > Whenever I try to link, I get a long list of undefined references ending > with > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.8.5/../../../../lib64/liblapacke.so: > undefined reference to `dgeevx_' > > [hennebry at localhost test]$ nm -...

Hi. Just wanted to let you know I am getting close to packaging R for AIX in 64.bit mode. One comment - the libtool.m4 I see used is quite old. The one I have on my system is 2.4.6, and what I see in R says: I am hoping a new libtool will clean up most of the manual work now needed. # Which release of libtool.m4 was used? macro_version=2.2.6 macro_revision=1.3012 This may be all that is