Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "langoverview".
2013 Oct 18
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Stackmap and Patchpoint Intrinsic Proposal
...'s meaningless to discuss the semantics when important terms are
undefined:
* "stack map" (and the format of a stack map, and where it is emitted/how
it can be accessed, etc.)
* "shadow": while it's fairly clear roughly what is meant by this, this is
Lang*Ref*, not "LangOverview" or "LangTour"
It may be that the inherently experimental nature of these intrinsics do
not lend itself to being documented adequately enough for inclusion in
LangRef at this point, in which case I would suggest demoting this
description to a new page for experimental intrinsics unt...
2013 Oct 18
5
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Stackmap and Patchpoint Intrinsic Proposal
This is a proposal for adding Stackmaps and Patchpoints to LLVM. The
first client of these features is the JavaScript compiler within the
open source WebKit project.
A Stackmap is a record of variable locations (registers and stack
offsets) at a particular instruction address.
A Patchpoint is an instruction address at which space is reserved for
patching a new instruction sequence at runtime.
2013 Oct 18
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Stackmap and Patchpoint Intrinsic Proposal
...th, at least, the description for x86 (and we can add descriptions for the other backends as they're validated).
This looks like a very-useful piece of functionality.
-Hal
> * "shadow": while it's fairly clear roughly what is meant by this,
> this is Lang*Ref*, not "LangOverview" or "LangTour"
>
>
> It may be that the inherently experimental nature of these intrinsics
> do not lend itself to being documented adequately enough for
> inclusion in LangRef at this point, in which case I would suggest
> demoting this description to a new page...
2013 Oct 18
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Stackmap and Patchpoint Intrinsic Proposal
...e of functionality.
I’m moving the intrinsic docs to a separate page, like exception intrinsics, and documenting the stack map format there.
-Andy
>
> -Hal
>
>> * "shadow": while it's fairly clear roughly what is meant by this,
>> this is Lang*Ref*, not "LangOverview" or "LangTour"
>>
>>
>> It may be that the inherently experimental nature of these intrinsics
>> do not lend itself to being documented adequately enough for
>> inclusion in LangRef at this point, in which case I would suggest
>> demoting this de...