search for: langmuir

> On Feb 25, 2016, at 7:49 AM, Brad King <brad.king at kitware.com> wrote: > > On 02/19/2016 10:35 AM, Ben Langmuir wrote: >>> On Feb 19, 2016, at 7:16 AM, Brad King wrote: >>> [snip] >>>> __NSConstantString and __NSConstantString_tag are now exposed. >>> To clarify, this is not so much about the appearance of new builtins >>> but that the structure has fields with...

On 02/19/2016 10:35 AM, Ben Langmuir wrote: >> On Feb 19, 2016, at 7:16 AM, Brad King wrote: >> [snip] >>> __NSConstantString and __NSConstantString_tag are now exposed. >> To clarify, this is not so much about the appearance of new builtins >> but that the structure has fields with no name. Other bui...

On 02/25/2016 11:41 AM, Ben Langmuir wrote: > Thanks for the patch. Committed as r261887 Great, thanks! -Brad

> On Feb 19, 2016, at 7:16 AM, Brad King <brad.king at kitware.com> wrote: > > On 02/18/2016 05:51 PM, Michka Popoff wrote: >> Our problem is that the AST contains some declarations which were not there before. > [snip] >> __NSConstantString and __NSConstantString_tag are now exposed. > [snip] >> Maybe someone could enlighten us about this change. >>

...just that that case is not covered by the tool. On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote: > Didn't realize that. I'll see if i can figure out how to make it delete > the virtual keyword. > > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Ben Langmuir <blangmuir at apple.com> wrote: > >> clang-modernize has a -format option that will run clang-format on the >> code it changes. >> >> Ben >> >> >> >> On Mar 5, 2014, at 2:26 PM, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote: >> &...

...;> >> >> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com>wrote: >> >> Didn't realize that. I'll see if i can figure out how to make it delete >> the virtual keyword. >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Ben Langmuir <blangmuir at apple.com> wrote: >> >> clang-modernize has a -format option that will run clang-format on the >> code it changes. >> >> Ben >> >> >> >> On Mar 5, 2014, at 2:26 PM, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote: >&g...

...:54 PM, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>> Didn't realize that. I'll see if i can figure out how to make it delete >>>> the virtual keyword. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Ben Langmuir <blangmuir at apple.com>wrote: >>>> >>>> clang-modernize has a -format option that will run clang-format on the >>>> code it changes. >>>> >>>> Ben >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mar 5, 2014, a...

clang-modernize has a -format option that will run clang-format on the code it changes. Ben On Mar 5, 2014, at 2:26 PM, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote: > clang-modernize can add the 'override', but it can't currently delete 'virtual'. It will also potentially overflow 80 columns. And if it removed virtual it would fail to align a second line of

...on](http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-November/092379.html) to LLVM IR. There hasn't been much feedback yet, but David Li [questions whether the effect could be modelled with simpler instructions/intrinsics](http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-November/092398.html). * Ben Langmuir has posted an [RFC on whether modules specified in a module map file should shadow implicitly discovered modules](http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2015-November/045999.html). ## LLVM commits * LLVM's autoconf-based build system is now officially deprecated, with the CMake build system...

Hi, I'm trying to understand how __builtin_setjmp/longjmp are supposed to interact with the frame pointer on x86_64. In particular, what is the expected behavior when the compiler chooses not to use rsp or rbp to address local variables? When built with Clang, the following program will segfault, but it is fine when built with GCC. The target is x86_64 linux. int main(int argc, char

Hi all, I have been looking at how to convert by-reference captures into by-copy captures for captured statements and possibly C++ lambdas, and am looking for some feedback on my approach. The motivation for trying to use copy captures is to avoid unnecessary loads that are otherwise required inside the outlined function. This can be important when the outlined function represents the body of a