search for: lands

Dear R support network I have a problem that is driving me crazy. I have a dataframe with about 74000 landscapes which I call "land". A landscape is a 2km -by- 2km square. Land has three columns: land$lat, land$long, and land$description. The last one holds a NON-unique (integer) description of each landscape. There are maybe 100 distinct descriptions. Identifying landscapes that have ident...

Hi there, I tried to export the names of country to a csv file with write.csv(). In the resulted file, ?land was coverted to <c5>land. Is there any way could prevent this happening? Thanks! > abc [1] "?land" > write.table(abc, file = "") "x" "1" "<c5>land" Best, Jinsong

On Jul 22, 2011, at 11:44 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: > On Jul 22, 2011, at 10:29 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > >> // Restrictions: >> >> There are several new invariants which will be enforced by the verifier: >> >> 1. A landing pad block is a basic block which is the unwind destination of an >> invoke instruction. >> 2. A landing pad block

On Jul 23, 2011, at 2:00 AM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: > On Jul 23, 2011, at 1:11 AM, Bill Wendling wrote: > >> On Jul 22, 2011, at 11:44 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: >>> Could we add: >>> >>> - A landing pad block is not the destination of any other kind of terminator. Only unwind edges are allowed. >>> >>> - The landingpad

On Jul 22, 2011, at 10:29 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > // Restrictions: > > There are several new invariants which will be enforced by the verifier: > > 1. A landing pad block is a basic block which is the unwind destination of an > invoke instruction. > 2. A landing pad block must have a landingpad instruction as its first non-PHI > instruction. > 3. The landingpad

Hi there, Why the same string is displayed in different form? > abc[,1] [1] "?land" "Afghanistan" > abc name 1 <c5>land 2 Afghanistan And more... > dput(abc, "aa.txt") > dget("aa.txt") name 1 <c5>land 2 Afghanistan > dget("aa.txt")[,1] [1] "<c5>land"

On Jul 23, 2011, at 1:11 AM, Bill Wendling wrote: > On Jul 22, 2011, at 11:44 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: >> Could we add: >> >> - A landing pad block is not the destination of any other kind of terminator. Only unwind edges are allowed. >> >> - The landingpad instruction must only appear at the top of a landing pad. It cannot appear in any other block, or

On Jul 23, 2011, at 4:15 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > On Jul 23, 2011, at 2:00 AM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: >> Yes. You scared me with 'requires considerable care'. Does that mean anything other than 'you have to duplicate the landing pad instead of splitting the unwind edge'. Is special magic required to duplicate a landingpad instruction? >> > There

Since llvm-gcc is a rather large code base, which I have never looked at (or even run), could you give me a starting point of where to look? One thing I'd be interested in knowing is whether the llvm.eh.exception() intrinsic can be called more than once in a landing pad. Say for example I have a nested try block, so that there are two landing pads, one for the inner try block, and one for

It looks like an encoding problem. It works fine for me with R encoding set to UTF-8 Here is part of my sessionInfo() results [1] LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C [3] LC_TIME=en_CA.UTF-8 LC_COLLATE=en_CA.UTF-8 [5] LC_MONETARY=en_CA.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=en_CA.UTF-8 I would suggest issuing the command sessionInfo() and seeing what your encoding is. On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 at 08:22,

I like the idea of the landing pad being associated with the basic block. It seems to me that the branch to the landing pad should be viewed as occurring at the beginning of the "earliest" block to branch to that landing pad. No assignments that occur in any block that unwinds to a particular landing pad are valid in that landing pad or any subsequent blocks. Other than that, standard

> My beta-radio it's work wonderful, but when the playlist finish, the > PID of ices die toguether :( > > What I can make so that this does not occur? using this script and running by starting it nohup script.sh & (or in a screen session) the good thing is even if ices segfaults the radio goes on.. Stephane. -- #!/bin/bash while [ 1 ] ; do ices ; done --- >8 ----

On 8 December 2010 18:45, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > I do not know EH or details of these proposals. But do not forget, basic blocks are merged/split/deleted, instructions are added/removed/moved/copied/replaced. Indeed. Having the information in the invoke kinda alleviates this problem, but removing the invoke syntax will bring that back. One way to merge two basic

You don't say, but I'd guess you're using Windows. In your code page, the character ? is probably not representable. At some point in the sequence of operations involved in printing the dataframe R puts the string into the native encoding, and since that's impossible on your system, it substitutes the <c5> instead. The fact that you can sometimes display it is because

Hi Talin, > Since llvm-gcc is a rather large code base, which I have never looked at > (or even run), could you give me a starting point of where to look? I meant: compile some nested C++ with llvm-gcc to see what it does. Otherwise, look in llvm-convert.cpp, especially EmitLandingPads. > One thing I'd be interested in knowing is whether the > llvm.eh.exception() intrinsic can

I am trying to assign increasing trip numbers to a binary variable ("land"; 1=home and 0=away) where a string of 1's shouldn't increment the trip_no more than once. For example; based on land<-c(0,0,0,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0) the "trip_no" sequence produced should be 1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,2,2,3,3,3,3,3,3 This is as far as I can get but Im stumped. In addition I

On Jul 22, 2011, at 11:44 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: > On Jul 22, 2011, at 10:29 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > >> // Restrictions: >> >> There are several new invariants which will be enforced by the verifier: >> >> 1. A landing pad block is a basic block which is the unwind destination of an >> invoke instruction. >> 2. A landing pad block

[Apr 26 10:47:01] NOTICE[32151]: chan_sip.c:16223 sip_poke_noanswer: Peer '3516533812' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 86 [Apr 26 10:47:11] NOTICE[32151]: chan_sip.c:12723 handle_response_peerpoke: Peer '3516533812' is now Reachable. (98ms / 2000ms) [Apr 26 12:08:49] WARNING[32273]: app_dial.c:1242 dial_exec_full: Unable to create channel of type 'SIP' (cause 20 -

On Nov 24, 2010, at 2:59 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > If I got it right, the dispatch instruction will tell the > instructions/calls to unwind to specific landing pads (cleanup areas, > terminate), but the region number will encode try/catch areas, so that > all those cleanup landing pads should ultimately end up in the catch > area for that region. Caveat: I'm speaking from what

?file.write() look for fileEncoding? el On 20/10/2020 11:13, Jinsong Zhao wrote: > Hi there, > > I tried to export the names of country to a csv file with write.csv(). In the resulted file, ?land was coverted to <c5>land. Is there any way could prevent this happening? Thanks! > >> abc > [1] "?land" >> write.table(abc, file = "") >