search for: lan1

...Samba experts, Please read all email because i'm desperate!!!!! I have problem on joining to LAN-s using Samba. Finally i got a solution to "see" booth workgroups on "Entire Network", but i'm having problem with stations located in LAN2. From any station located in LAN1, I can see LAN2 workgroup and the browse list with stations located in LAN2, but when i'm tring to access and station in it, i get connection refused. I want to mention that acces by IP address is working (eg: \\192.168.1.72)!!! It seems to be a probelm related to browse list and my wins se...

...s. suffice it to say I need bridges to connect a few different vlans that should all be one but can''t be because of firmware constraints. so my first step is to get shorewall to know about bridges. I convert my existing config to a bunch of bridges lan0 becomes a member of br-lan0, lan1 becomes a member of br-lan1, and shorewall gets edited. interfaces and routestopped, I prefix lan0 and lan1 with br- and I restart shorewall (sudo shorewall safe-restart). This is a ubuntu system, and far as I can tell everything is right. I''m using shroewall 4.4 so I add routeback...

Hello to everyone, Here is the situation: [LAN1]---[eth3]/----------\ | LinuxBR |[eth2]---[LAN0]---[linuxGW]---[internet] [LAN2]---[eth4]\----------/ Whole LAN is in subnet 10.0.0.0/24. So I need: LAN0, LAN1, LAN2 could not see each other. LAN0, LAN1, LAN2 is in same subnet (10.0.0.0/24). All LANs have to get only inter...

...low for installed pkgs. [root at firebox ~]# rpm -qa |grep iptables iptables-1.2.11-3.1.RHEL4 [root at firebox ~]# rpm -qa |grep iproute iproute-2.6.9-3.EL4.3.centos4 This firewall has 3 ethernet cards at the moment. one is connected to router. one is connected to our DMZ zone. one is connected to LAN1. These are ips of the firewall. eth0 (internet) - 1.2.3.4/255.255.255.248 (pls assume it. For security reason, I will not give you the actual ip) eth1 (DMZ Zone) - 192.168.100.254/255.255.255.0 eth2 (LAN1) - 192.168.101.254/255.255.255.0 Now, everyone in LAN1 has access to internet. (due to SNAT...

Dear Friends, I have been using shorewall for some years. I want to set up "shorewall 2" router behind firewall, accordind to this picture: I have lost at setuping "zone"-s (wifi, lan1, net). Plese help me ! Thanks, psw net | | SHOREWALL 1 ------- lan 1 | | |wifi | | SHOREWALL 2 ------- lan 2 | ---------------- lan 3

...outer between several subnets (each also a different segment), in total 3 different lans, 2 dmz, and 4 internet connections, my default FORWARD policy is DROP, here is a simplified example of my config with only two lan segments and internet connection: Allow forwarding between lans -A FORWARD -s lan1/mask -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -d lan1/mask -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -s lan2/mask -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -d lan2/mask -j ACCEPT Are some of those redundant? Then I want to nat anything that is not to one of the local subnets (i.e. is going to internet), but the only way I can find to do that is to setup rul...

An very interesting test did yesterday that, LAN1 and LAN2 setup an tinc VPN which is quite simple(the physical link between tinc nodes are quite stable/fast), and no any application traffic to go through the tinc. Later, I setup smokeping which LAN1 initial 20 ping to LAN2 on a per-minute basis, but as you saw from the below picture, it had pack...

I have a question about samba and sticky bits. I have a share with the following configuration: [documents] comment = documents path = /shares/documents public = no writeable = yes printable = no valid users = @lan1 force user = docadmin force group = lan1 create mode = 0440 force create mode = 0440 directory mode = 1770 force directory mode = 1770 delete read only = no I also have the sticky bit set on /shares/documents. Now, when I drop the file 'test.txt' in the directory, it has the...

Hi all I have a problem splitting traffic behind 2 adsl. My situation: _________router2 | lan1 ------- fw ----------- router1 | lan2----------| lan1 use router1, lan2 router2. The linux default gw is set to router2, lan2 browse internet without any problem (icmp, tcp..). Lan1 is blocked. >From lan1 i can ping router1, and i''ve set this iproute rules: ip route...

Hi, list members. I''ve been reading a lot about traffic control because at work we have the following configuration...... LINUX BOX _____ 100 mbit | | LAN1--------------|eth0 | | | 2 mbit SDSL | eth1|-------------------INTERNET 100 mbit | | LAN2--------------|eth2 | | | ------- The linux box (REDHAT 9-2.4.20-30.9) acts as a firewall-NAT solution for both internal networks. Also the linux acts as SMTP gateway (or redirector) for two diffe...

...media and all my IP applications should work, it is like the PPP IP link over PSTN I would like to have. If one have an Internet/SDL access is it possible to have a dual access, in such if one network fails, I can switch automatically to another? Here below the network architecture I imagine. (IP LAN1)-ASTERISK-(Digium FXO card)<-->(PSTN)<-->(Digium FXO Card)-ASTERISK-(IP LAN 2) Thank you so much for your help. Brice

Hi I set-up a gre tunnel between two linux boxes. A short diagram is like this lan1 -> router1 ----- router2 <- lan2 The tunnel works fine, i can ping from lan1 to lan2 but the problem is the speed between lan1 and lan2 is lower than it supposed to be If i log in to router1 and transfer something from router2 or lan2 it is working at maximum speed, 1024kbits/s. The problem...

 Hello, everybody.  This one''s got me stumped.  What I''m trying to do is have two networks--192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0--with SMB and WINS running between them.  So far I can mount SMB shares allright, but I can''t browse by WINS names across the router.  I''ve posted this question on Linuxquestions.org; you''ll find the details there.  Here are my

I have the following situation: A Linux 2.4.22 server: Physical ethernet: lan1 - Ethernet port (Internet) lan2 - Ethernet port (Cisco Switch, Trunk port) Tunnel: tap1 - OpenVPN in tcp-server mode VLAN's: lan2.201 lan2.202 lan2.203 tap1.201 tap1.202 tap1.203 Bridges: br201 (lan2.201, tap1.201) br202 (lan2.202, tap1.202) br203 (lan2.203, tap1.203) On the other end, the...

...gt;eth0.2 | ---------------------------- I have to bridge the 2 lans in the left side of the diagram with my linux box running as a bridge. I have to tag the traffic of each lan so I created the 2 vlans interfaces on eth0 (tag 1 and tag 2). All works fine. But now I have to priorize LAN1 traffic so it leaves the bridge before LAN2. Also I need to shape the traffic to the 1 Mbps link. I read about the "prio" qdisc but it honours the TOS field of the IP packets, and I don''t want to unless it was really necessary. I read about the "prio" option of the htb...

Is there a way to specify a variable for the gateway in /etc/shorewall/providers? I have in my scenario: eth0 dsl (static IP) eth1 cable (dhcp assigned IP) eth2 lan1 Is it possible to specify the gateway as a variable based on the current DHCP lease (like $eth0_gw)? I''m following the documentation at http://www.shorewall.net/Shorewall_and_Routing.html. -Scott

Hello, I have 2 ISP uplinks (zones: inet1 and inet2), each with a fixed IP on the outside and a routed subnet (/25 and /26) on the inside. So, behind the firewall i have 2 networksegments (lan1 and lan2) with public IP-addresses. The segments are completely isolated from eachother: hosts in zone "lan1" connect only to "inet1" and hosts in zone "lan2" only connect to "inet2". Because the segements don''t have to switch ISP, loadbalancing...

...to what is loaded along the > way. A major problem with my system. I'm sorry for perhaps asking something entirely obvious, but have you tried: kernel-dir $ rsync -avr tools/testing/selftests/ root@$board:selftests/ board $ cd selftests/drivers/net/dsa/ board $ ./bridge_locked_port.sh lan0 lan1 lan2 lan3 ? This is how I always run them, and it worked fine with both Debian (where it's easy to add missing packages to the rootfs) or with a more embedded-oriented Buildroot.

...nux kernel (not xenified ) - i see those packets. Ethernet card used in xen server is 04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 80003ES2LAN Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev 01) and e1000 driver is used. In other direction arp is working ok. From Xen server: breeze:~# tcpdump -nn -i lan1 -e arp tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on lan1, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes 16:35:27.082508 00:30:48:62:d3:4a > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, ethertype ARP (0x0806), length 42: arp who-has 10.5.5.254 tell 10.5.5.1 16:35:27.083213...

I would like to route ssh in my network via DSL2 and all other trafic via DSL1. So far I menaged to do it for LAN2 but there are still WLAN1,LAN3 and LAN1 to go. On all routers I added table "pilicka" with rule for fwmark and I fwmarked ssh. # ip rule show 0: from all lookup local 32765: from all fwmark 0x3 lookup pilicka 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup default # iptables -L -t mangle Chain PREROU...