search for: lammer

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "lammer".

Did you mean: hammer
1997 Aug 22
1
R-beta: odd result with sum?
I am using R 0.49 and I did not see this in the archives: Given sum() defaults to na.rm = FALSE, should both of these results be NA? > sum(c(1,NA)) [1] NA > sum(c(NA,1)) [1] 0 -- Richard Lammers Phone: (603) 862-4699 Complex System Research Center Fax: (603) 862-0188 University of New Hampshire email: Richard.Lammers at unh.edu Durham, NH 03824 (USA) URL: http://pyramid.sr.unh.edu/~lammers =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-...
1997 Jun 18
1
R-beta: BATCH
Does R have the ability run in batch mode as described in the S New 'blue book'? Richard -- Richard Lammers Phone: (603) 862-4699 Complex System Research Center Fax: (603) 862-0188 University of New Hampshire email: Richard.Lammers at unh.edu Durham, NH 03824 (USA) URL: TBA =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=...
1997 Jun 20
2
R-beta: purpose of n in identify() function?
...> y_1:10 > plot(x,y) > identify(x,y, n=1) [1] 2 3 > I clicked on two points and identify() returned both of them (2 and 3). The manual says n is the maximum number of points to be identified. If I specify n=1, should identify() return a single value? Richard -- Richard Lammers Phone: (603) 862-4699 Complex System Research Center Fax: (603) 862-0188 University of New Hampshire email: Richard.Lammers at unh.edu Durham, NH 03824 (USA) URL: TBA =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=...
2008 Apr 29
2
request for feature
Dear developers, I need the feature of separately jailed, user writeable and user owned home dirs very badly because I have an SFTP server with 500 users who are partly nested could you please add a feature to set non root chroots with the %h option ? Otherwise I have to rewrite the chroot patch for 4.7p1 :-( thank you very much in advance Dirk
2016 Jul 26
2
[BUG] Re: auth_bind with "()" in username not working
Hi guys, I had a look in the sources about this problem. the problem seems to be the ldap_escape function that is called from ldap_verify_plain_auth_bind_userdn(..) I dont really know if this escaping is needed at this point, but with this change it works for me. No other problems discovered so far. could somebody, who is deeper in the sources give me a hint if this will make some troubles?