search for: lalug

Phexro <ieure@linknet.kitsap.lib.wa.us> writes: > chroot()''d processes. So, important system calls could be modified thus: Since there are tons of syscalls and new ones appearing all the time, "Fixing" some of them doesn''t seem like a good idea. It seems more reasonbale to deny access to all of them, except for a few specific ones (that can moreover be

...scussion the better the design, and the more attractive such changes will ultimately be. Best wishes Andrew -- Linux-PAM: http://parc.power.net/morgan/Linux-PAM/index.html libpwdb: http://parc.power.net/morgan/libpwdb/index.html [ For those that prefer FTP --- ftp://ftp.lalug.org/morgan ]

Marek Michalkiewicz <marekm@I17LINUXB.ISTS.PWR.WROC.PL> wrote: : It seems that most of the RedHat 5.3.12 security patches are in the : standard 5.4.17, except for the patch below. Also, there are more : (different) fixes in 5.4.18 (check h_length against sizeof(sin_addr) : in inet/rcmd.c and inet/rexec.c). : + { : +