Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "lajus".
Did you mean:
cajus
2004 Jan 31
6
HTB dequeueing in pairs fixed
I posted earlier when I noticed that htb was releasing packets in pairs,
even though my burst/quantums were 1 pkt.
To fix I set HTB_HYSTERESIS 0 in net/sched/sch_htb.c .
This gives a noticable gain in upstream worst case latency, for me with
256kbit/s up I used to see +90 sometimes, now it''s +45. For the many who
have 128 up it should limit them to +90 rather than +180.
Andy.
2004 Jan 15
3
put shaping on ppp or eth?
Hi,
I wanna do some shaping on a DSL line that is plugged to the eth1 nic.
Should I attach the qdiscs directly to the ppp device or can I use the
eth1 device instead? What (and why) makes more sense?
thx
cb
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
2003 Nov 26
3
Fair queueing: SFQ vs TBF
...when using as leaf in one leaf with
several hosts (like subnet) to splice traffic equaly to user number?
Like 2 users = 256/2, 3 = 256/3 and so on. WRR was pretty good for this
job, but it''s only for 2.4.21 kernels and mine''s 2.4.22.
So what is better: SFQ or TBF?
--
Artūras Šlajus
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
2004 May 21
2
fwmark / MARK / --set-mark syntax never run on my system! Search step by step help.
Hello!
This arguments never run on my system, but I need this:
#!/bin/bash -x
echo "1"
iptables -t mangle -p tcp -d 0/0 --dport 80 -j MARK --set-mark 2
echo "2"
echo "201 T1" >> /etc/iproute2/rt_tables
echo "3"
ip rule add fwmark 2 table T1
echo "4"
ip route add default via 192.168.21.2 dev eth1 table T1
echo "5"
ip route
2006 Jun 19
3
Strange behavior of :through association.
class Host < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :person
end
class House < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :people, :dependent => true
has_many :hosts, :through => :person
end
class Person < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :house
has_many :hosts, :dependent => true
end
Now when I try to do:
@hosts = House.find_by_id(params[:namas]).hosts
from my controller I get this:
2011 Sep 27
0
has_many with :finder_sql returns [nil]?
Is it supposed to do that? I find it very confusing.
AR 3.0.10
class Unit
has_many :units, :finder_sql => proc {
"SELECT * FROM `#{table_name}` WHERE `location_id`=#{id} AND
`location_type`=#{Location::UNIT}" }
end
Both should return []. However...
>> Unit.first.units.find([1000000])
[2011-09-27 10:05:11|main|debug] Unit Load (4.0ms) SELECT `units`.*
FROM `units`