search for: lachana

I would lilke to shape upload ftp bandwidth in a dual ISP setup [shorewall show connections] tcp 6 431215 ESTABLISHED src=192.168.2.89 dst=83.xxx.xxx.23 sport=1487 dport=21 src=83.xxx.xxx.23 dst=10.0.11.2 sport=21 dport=1487 [ASSURED] use=2 mark=1 [tcdevices] #INTERFACE IN-BANDWITH OUT-BANDWIDTH $EIF 970kbit 245kbit $LIF 970kbit 245kbit

Hi all, Is there a way to prohibit users of creating subfolder(s) under a Public Namespace ??? Here is my conf #------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ log_timestamp: %Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S protocols: imaps ssl_ca_file: /etc/postfix/sasl/cacert.pem ssl_cert_file: /etc/postfix/sasl/cert.pem ssl_key_file: /etc/postfix/sasl/key.pem login_dir:

OK.. So I synced the clock.... and got .... dovecot: Time just moved backwards by 1 seconds. I'll sleep now until we're back in present. http://wiki.dovecot.org/TimeMovedBackwards ( The first time I did this the clock moved backwards 2 hours after a timezone change and dovecot suicided ) I think I understand the concept ... However a mail server should probably be synchronized to the

..... -m ipp2p --kaza for each different P2P protocol. as a result shorewall does not recognize the existence of ipp2p support. we are currently using shorewall version 3.4.8 but the same problem occurs for other versions of shorewall ( 4.0.9.1 shell ) also ... Please advise Kind regards, Harry Lachanas. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can''t happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and regi...

Dovecot Version 1.2.11 Created Public Namespaces and folders idx and control are created in each users Maildir/ aka namespace public { prefix=Public/ separator = / location = maildir:/home/Public-Folders-Mail/Public-RO:INDEX=~/Maildir/p1-idx:CONTROL=~/Maildir/p1-ctrl hidden = no subscriptions = no inbox = no } The problem occurs after a user has subscribed to The

Given that a 4-day silence on this list is almost unprecedented, thought I had better send a test post. Apologies for the spam. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It is the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Xq1LFB

Hi, I am on dovecot 1.1.11 trying to figure out the expire tool .... The thing is that when I had confed the exp tool there where a bunch of mails inside the mail boxes. Thus it seems as if the database is not updated about them. Is there a way to update it from command line to include the old mails ??? Thanks Harry

If an incoming mail is saved in 2 mail locations via dovecot deliver, and its wished that if deleted from box "a" should also be deleted from box "b" ... wil it be safe to delete based upon the W=xxxxx part of the file name ???? So far my tests indicate that It could be true ... Thanks Harry

...all/interface to wlan0 started shorewall I can connect eo the INTERNET with shorewall running Horace From: Horace Franklin Jr <horacef@usnetizen.com> Reply-to: horacef@usnetizen.com To: Harry Lachanas <grharry@freemail.gr> Cc: Shorewall Users Mailing List <shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] Wan0 Cannot Connect to Internet Date: 05/01/2011 09:30:44 AM I_ ha...

Harry Lachanas wrote: > Finally got it .... > > Thank god that I''ve stepped over this link > > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2002q3/005039.html > > Which states the reason why the www packets were not routed corectly.. > > the ip rule syntax requires the fwmark...

I came up with this trick That is Since my previous mail server had a bunch of complex procmail recipies and I am not sure that I can turn them into sieve scripts I am calling dovecot deliver to drop mail in it's final $DEFAULT destination. :0 | /some/path/dovecot/deliver in order to update the index, control files etc upon delivery time. So far in my "tests" it works. But I

and Here is my rule that did this DNAT net:eth0 dmz:62.103.xx.101 - - - 62.103.xx.105,103.xx.106,... What I was trying to achieve: Since I am only using 3/16, I wanted to fake the rest of them as being alive hosts. Only to accept pings and some allowed protocols accessed from the net. What is wrong with my rule? Will REDIRECT work ??? Harry Regards.

Hi all .... I Have installed Bering LRP on Many sites and I am very pleased with the capabilites of shorewall. Howerver I came across a prob that I am unaware ot its solution. Using shorewall 2.0.2f Kernel 2.4.24 On one Site LRP box serves internet outgoing connections through ( static IP ) a DSL line AND an incoming dial-in PPP conection. My shorewall configuration Is based upon the fact

I thought it would be nice to have vboxes insead of user logins ... Now I am confuesed and in trouble .. My server serves 2 domains so user1 at domain1.com is the same as user1 at domain2.org I've created the mail_location string with %n and static userdb with %n dovecot creates 2 mail user directories user1 at domain1.com user1 at domain2.org What the heck am I missing .. ?? Your

Hi all ... Happy to be back for a question/suggestion again .... I came accross this weird situation. I take care of a site running shorewall 3.0.5 in the firewall and qmail in the DMZ ( mail server ). A remote clients smtp server denies to accept more than one incomming smtp connections from my site :-(. In my site users are always sending mail to this server ( 50 - 60 per day ). So

Hi list, My network was assigned a private AS and my ISP(4) urged me to use BGP ! My Other 3 providers on my Shorewall BOX are typical aDSL lines while the 4th is an 1G optical uplink with 64 addresses. Currently I am in a balance, track mode in shorewall ISP setup.. After I installed - configured and started zebra + bgp my static routing tables got filled with about 850 static routes to