search for: lacey

Rsync has no memory of what other instances of rsync have done in the past. An existing file with a different name is of no interest to it unless --delete in which case it would be deleted. Maybe what you really want is --partial-dir? On 6/7/23 16:17, Lacey, Nathan wrote: > I'm suggesting a partial file that isn't hidden is worse. > Because any other app looking at the file would think the transfer is > complete and try to use it. > > It doesn't need to be a orphaned file,? when called next time with > --partial rsync...

On 2013 Nov 15, at 19:41, Mark Lacey <mark.lacey at apple.com> wrote: > I don’t have the C/C++ standards in front of me but IIRC whether a char/short/int/long/long long bitfield is signed or unsigned is implementation defined. You need to explicitly specify signed or unsigned in order to have any guarantee of the signedness,...

...was part of a case, because of the knowledge of the case value, the block was a candidate for better optimization. However, when we move the body of the case into the default, the knowledge of the case value is lost and the body is less optimizable. -Milind On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Mark Lacey <mark.lacey at apple.com> wrote: > On Jul 17, 2013, at 9:01 PM, Milind Chabbi <Milind.Chabbi at rice.edu> wrote: >> I am performing a transformation that requires changing the targets of >> a basic block ending with a switch instruction. >> In particular, I need to...

Hi, I would like to add a key to my trellis plot using draw.key. Here is what I want: 3 x 6 key where the first row is a header. row 1: empty, "S-R Mapping", "R^2" row 2: pch=17, "Color", 0.951 row 2: pch=17, "Shape", 0.934 ect... The problem is that I would like the cell in the upper left corner to be empty (a placeholder) with the remaining

...a tarball or a zip file or in place, etc. From a tarball the procedure is a lot like what is described above after extracting to a temporary source directory; a zip is a copy of the final install directory, so most of the work has already been done. Duncan Murdoch On 4/7/2006 7:21 AM, Steven Lacey wrote: > Yes. I am reinstalling the package, and your explanations both hit on what > is likely going on. However, before reinstalling the package with R CMD > INSTALL --build I call R CMD REMOVE, which I thought meant starting from > scratch. That is, there would be no memory in the he...

On Nov 15, 2013, at 3:42 PM, Kay Tiong Khoo <kkhoo at perfwizard.com> wrote: > I've been diagnosing this bug: > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17827 > > Summary: I think the following program miscompiles at -O1 because the fact that 'f0' is a signed 3-bit value is lost in the unoptimized LLVM IR. How do we fix this? I don’t have the C/C++ standards in front

On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Chad Rosier <chad.rosier at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Mark Lacey <mark.lacey at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Aug 8, 2013, at 9:56 AM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Chad, >> >> This is a great transform to do, but you’re right that it’s only safe >> under fast-math. This is particular...

...lain bit-fields could be either signed or unsigned. C++ removed this allowance in core issue 739: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#739 On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith < dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: > On 2013 Nov 15, at 19:41, Mark Lacey <mark.lacey at apple.com> wrote: > > > I don’t have the C/C++ standards in front of me but IIRC whether a > char/short/int/long/long long bitfield is signed or unsigned is > implementation defined. You need to explicitly specify signed or unsigned > in order to have any guar...

I've been diagnosing this bug: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17827 Summary: I think the following program miscompiles at -O1 because the fact that 'f0' is a signed 3-bit value is lost in the unoptimized LLVM IR. How do we fix this? $ cat bitfield.c /* %struct.S = type { i8, [3 x i8] } ??? */ struct S { int f0:3; } a; int foo (int p) { struct S c = a; c.f0 = p & 6;

...work. I suspect looking at the code and the calls to bwplot and xyplot (all of which are S-plus) that not all this code has been converted. I am new to R and thus am I being niave to expect all the code (particularly the plotting routines) to work with R? Many thanks for any help. -- Dr. Tony Lacey (PhD) - Imaging Science & Bio-medical Engineering, University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Oxford Rd., Manchester. UK. M13 9PT [+44 (0)161 275 7669] a.lacey at man.ac.uk http://www.niac.man.ac.uk/~ajl/ `Linux. The choice of a GNU generation.' -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-...

...nowledge of the case > value, the block was a candidate for better optimization. However, > when we move the body of the case into the default, the knowledge of > the case value is lost and the body is less optimizable. > > -Milind > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Mark Lacey <mark.lacey at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jul 17, 2013, at 9:01 PM, Milind Chabbi <Milind.Chabbi at rice.edu> > wrote: > >> I am performing a transformation that requires changing the targets of > >> a basic block ending with a switch instruction. > >>...

...lue, the block was a candidate for better optimization. However, >> when we move the body of the case into the default, the knowledge of >> the case value is lost and the body is less optimizable. >> >> -Milind >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Mark Lacey <mark.lacey at apple.com> wrote: >> > On Jul 17, 2013, at 9:01 PM, Milind Chabbi <Milind.Chabbi at rice.edu> >> > wrote: >> >> I am performing a transformation that requires changing the targets of >> >> a basic block ending with a switch instru...

On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Mark Lacey <mark.lacey at apple.com> wrote: > > On Aug 8, 2013, at 9:56 AM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > > Hi Chad, > > This is a great transform to do, but you’re right that it’s only safe > under fast-math. This is particularly interesting when the original...

...ion if allowed by fast-math flags in IR, or fast-math mode in selection DAG. On Aug 8, 2013, at 2:23 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Chad Rosier <chad.rosier at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Mark Lacey <mark.lacey at apple.com> wrote: > > On Aug 8, 2013, at 9:56 AM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > >> Hi Chad, >> >> This is a great transform to do, but you’re right that it’s only safe under fast-math. This is particularly interesting when the...

...ine seems turning "((x and 6) shl 5) slt 32" into "(x and 6) slt 1". If the comparison were unsigned or the shl had a nsw flag, I think this would be okay. Since none of these is true, I don't think this transformation is correct. H. On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 1:41 AM, Mark Lacey <mark.lacey at apple.com> wrote: > > On Nov 15, 2013, at 3:42 PM, Kay Tiong Khoo <kkhoo at perfwizard.com> wrote: > > I've been diagnosing this bug: > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17827 > > Summary: I think the following program miscompiles at -O1 becau...

Thanks, Mark. I will give the paper a look. On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Mark Lacey <mark.lacey at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Chad, > > On Aug 6, 2013, at 7:46 AM, Chad Rosier <chad.rosier at gmail.com> wrote: > > > All, > > I have some code that looks like the following: > > > > { > > double a, b, c; > > for (...) { &gt...

Hi, There is rather large discrepancy in the size of the object as it lives in R and the size of the object when it is written to the disk. The object in question is an S4 of a homemade class "sa". I first call a function that writes a list of these objects to a file called "data.RData". The size of this file is 14,411 KB. I would assume on average then, that each list

...ghtly different values each time it is run because it lands in a different location. I suspect my later interpretation is false because the estimated values do not change after each and every replication of the analysis. But I thought I might ask. Thanks for any insight you can provide, Steve Lacey [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I have x, y, z data. The x, y fields dont change but Z does. How do I add a very small number onto the end of each x, y data point. For example: Original (X) Original (Y) Original (Z) 15 20 30 15 20 40 New (X) New (Y)

On Aug 8, 2013, at 9:56 AM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Chad, > > This is a great transform to do, but you’re right that it’s only safe under fast-math. This is particularly interesting when the original divisor is a constant so you can materialize the reciprocal at compile-time. You’re right that in either case, this optimization should only kick in when