Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "labelind".
Did you mean:
labeling
2009 Jun 15
2
NA as a result of using GLM
Hi all!
Maybe someone could help me with the following. I know this hasn't directly to do with ecology but I'm also using glm.
I have a list of 16 genes and 10 samples. The samples are of two types, 4 Ctrl and 6 Diseased. If,
labelInd<-as.factor(c(rep("0",4),rep("1",6)))
genes.glm<-glm(labelInd ~ ., family=binomial, data=mat)
beeing "mat" the 10x16 matrix (without NAs), I got 17 values, first the intercept, 9 numerical values and "NA" for the last 7 genes. Does anybody you know why...
2009 Jun 15
0
books on Time serie
...hotmail.com
>
>
> Hi all!
> Maybe someone could help me with the following. I know this hasn't
> directly to do with ecology but I'm also using glm.
>
> I have a list of 16 genes and 10 samples. The samples are of two
> types, 4 Ctrl and 6 Diseased. If,
>
> labelInd<-as.factor(c(rep("0",4),rep("1",6)))
> genes.glm<-glm(labelInd ~ ., family=binomial, data=mat)
>
>
> beeing "mat" the 10x16 matrix (without NAs), I got 17 values, first
> the intercept, 9 numerical values and "NA" for the last 7 genes....