search for: l_type

Hello, I'm using samba 4.7.3 to run an AD and I'm currently having issues with the MIT kerberos because it stops some time after starting (and apparently working correctly) without logging nothing out of the ordinary. My setup has 2 DC: one in an ubuntu 12.04 with version 4.1.9 (which we're migrating from) and the one I mentioned in CentOS 7 (which will be the only DC in the future).

...923 rpc_server 28923 rpc_server 28923 rpc_server 28923 dreplsrv 28930 dc000:~# strace -p 28923 -f strace: Process 28923 attached strace: [ Process PID=28923 runs in x32 mode. ] strace: [ Process PID=28923 runs in 64 bit mode. ] fcntl(15, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_UNLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=332, l_len=1}) = 0 fcntl(15, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_RDLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=368, l_len=1}) = 0 fcntl(15, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_RDLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=5073496, l_len=1}) = 0 fcntl(15, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_UNLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=368, l_len...

.../fratar-btrfs/profiles read only = No hide files = /desktop.ini/$RECYCLE.BIN/ vfs objects = btrfs [users] path = /mnt/fratar-btrfs/users read only = No vfs objects = btrfs strace -p PID is giving a lot of messages like these: fcntl(9, F_SETLK, {l_type=F_RDLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=168, l_len=40000}) = 0 fcntl(9, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_RDLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=40168, l_len=0}) = 0 fcntl(12, F_SETLK, {l_type=F_RDLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=168, l_len=40000}) = 0 fcntl(12, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_RDLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=40168,...

...ver 28923 > rpc_server 28923 > dreplsrv 28930 > > dc000:~# strace -p 28923 -f > strace: Process 28923 attached > strace: [ Process PID=28923 runs in x32 mode. ] > strace: [ Process PID=28923 runs in 64 bit mode. ] > fcntl(15, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_UNLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, > l_start=332, l_len=1}) = 0 > fcntl(15, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_RDLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, > l_start=368, l_len=1}) = 0 > fcntl(15, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_RDLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, > l_start=5073496, l_len=1}) = 0 > fcntl(15, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_UNLCK, l_wh...

...er 28923 > rpc_server 28923 > dreplsrv 28930 > > dc000:~# strace -p 28923 -f > strace: Process 28923 attached > strace: [ Process PID=28923 runs in x32 mode. ] > strace: [ Process PID=28923 runs in 64 bit mode. ] fcntl(15, F_SETLKW, > {l_type=F_UNLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=332, l_len=1}) = 0 > fcntl(15, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_RDLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=368, > l_len=1}) = 0 fcntl(15, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_RDLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, > l_start=5073496, l_len=1}) = 0 fcntl(15, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_UNLCK, > l_whence=SEEK...

...----- ---------------- 96.49 0.169676 0 964777 13 fcntl 1.74 0.003061 10 305 epoll_wait 0.74 0.001302 0 10672 read ............ strace -p2053 returns hundreds of thousands of lines like this : fcntl(12, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_RDLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=1652100, l_len=1}) = 0 fcntl(12, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_UNLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=11368, l_len=1}) = 0 fcntl(12, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_RDLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=11368, l_len=1}) = 0 fcntl(12, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_UNLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=165210...

...last_refresh() fails, and prints these messages. See strace log fragment below. === [pid 31896] open("/var/run/samba/printer_list.tdb", O_RDWR|O_CREAT, 0644) = 37 [pid 31896] fcntl(37, F_GETFD) = 0 [pid 31896] fcntl(37, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0 [pid 31896] fcntl(37, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_WRLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=0, l_len=1}) = 0 [pid 31896] fcntl(37, F_SETLK, {l_type=F_WRLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=4, l_len=1}) = 0 [pid 31896] fcntl(37, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_WRLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=168, l_len=0}) = 0 [pid 31896] lseek(37, 0, SEEK_SET) = 0 [pid 31896]...

On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 22:21 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:58:33PM +0000, Jon Gerdes wrote: > > winbind has a concept of offline and online but I don't know what > > that > > is, nor how nss works with it. I've tried using smbcontrol to tell > > winbind it is offline or online but that does not seem to work. > > Restarting

...esent with vfs_fruit activated and introduces an additional delay of ~ 0.00033 s per listed file. strace -T reveals the following with vfs_fruit activated: newfstatat(35, "03915", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0660, st_size=1265, ...}, AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW) = 0 <0.000243> fcntl(20, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_RDLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=8368, l_len=1}) = 0 <0.000010> fcntl(20, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_UNLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=8368, l_len=1}) = 0 <0.000009> stat("stroth/testfiles_10000-50000/10000/03915", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0660, st_size=1265, ...}) = 0 <0.000312>...

...introduces an additional delay of ~ 0.00033 s > per listed file. > > strace -T reveals the following with vfs_fruit activated: > > newfstatat(35, "03915", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0660, st_size=1265, ...}, > AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW) = 0 <0.000243> > fcntl(20, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_RDLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=8368, > l_len=1}) = 0 <0.000010> > fcntl(20, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_UNLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=8368, > l_len=1}) = 0 <0.000009> > stat("stroth/testfiles_10000-50000/10000/03915", > {st_mode=S_IFREG|0660, > st_size=1...

...} +#ifdef BROKEN_X86_ALIGNMENT +/* just account for different alignment */ +static unsigned long copy_to_space_resv(unsigned long arg) +{ + struct space_resv_32 __user *p32 = (void __user *)arg; + struct space_resv __user *p = compat_alloc_user_space(sizeof(*p)); + + if (copy_in_user(&p->l_type, &p32->l_type, sizeof(s16)) || + copy_in_user(&p->l_whence, &p32->l_whence, sizeof(s16)) || + copy_in_user(&p->l_start, &p32->l_start, sizeof(s64)) || + copy_in_user(&p->l_len, &p32->l_len, sizeof(s64)) || + copy_in_user(&p->l_...

...int fd; int debug = 1; struct flock lck; lck.l_whence = 0; lck.l_start = 0L; lck.l_len = 0L; if (-1 == (fd = open(argv[1], O_RDONLY))) { perror(argv[1]); exit(1); } do { lck.l_type = F_WRLCK; if(-1 == fcntl(fd, F_GETLK, &lck)) { perror("fcntl getlk"); exit(1); }; if (lck.l_type != F_UNLCK) { printf("%d %d %c %8ld %8ld\n&quo...

...tic struct ocfs2_lock_res_ops ocfs2_dealloc_lops = { + .ast = ocfs2_dealloc_ast_func, + .bast = ocfs2_dealloc_bast_func, + .unlock_ast = ocfs2_unlock_ast_func, + .unblock = ocfs2_unblock_osb_lock, +}; + static inline int ocfs2_is_inode_lock(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres) { return lockres->l_type == OCFS2_LOCK_TYPE_META || @@ -138,10 +148,16 @@ static inline int ocfs2_is_rename_lock(s return lockres->l_type == OCFS2_LOCK_TYPE_RENAME; } +static inline int ocfs2_is_dealloc_lock(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres) +{ + return lockres->l_type == OCFS2_LOCK_TYPE_DEALLOC; +} + static inli...

...tdio.h> /* kernel op locks */ #define F_GETLEASE 1025 int main(int argc, char **argv) { struct flock the_lock; int f; int retlck; int smblck; if(argc != 2) { fprintf(stdout, "Usage: %s <file>\n", argv[0]); return 1; } f = open(argv[1], O_RDONLY); the_lock.l_type = F_WRLCK; the_lock.l_whence = SEEK_SET; the_lock.l_start = 0; the_lock.l_len = 0; if(f <= 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Cannot open file: %s\n", argv[1]); return 1; } fcntl(f, F_GETLK, &the_lock); retlck = flock(f, LOCK_EX | LOCK_NB); smblck = fcntl(f, F_GETLEASE, 0); fpr...

...and rob.xls files. What happen? Samba does not put fcntl lock in rob.dwg and rob.sdw files? Is it a normal behaviour or a bug? What is the diference between DENY_NONE and DENY_WRITE? Is it my program fault? Are there some mistakes? See my C program fragment: lock.l_type=F_WRLCK; /*** Write lock ***/ lock.l_whence=SEEK_SET; /*** File begin ***/ lock.l_start=0; /*** Off set, 0 ***/ lock.l_len=0; /*** Up to the end of file ***/ lock.l_pid = pid; /*** this procces pid ***/ ret=fcntl(fd, F_GETLK, & lock); /** see if t...

...igned int l_ro_holders; unsigned int l_ex_holders; - char l_level; - char l_requested; - char l_blocking; + signed char l_level; + signed char l_requested; + signed char l_blocking; /* Data packed - type enum ocfs2_lock_type */ unsigned char l_type;

mainly question for the intel folks, any chance to rerun the ltp testsuites to see how we are doing these days with all the changes ? thanks :) Wim

.../usr/local/samba/lib/libsamba-util.so.0(smb_panic+0x28) [0x7f0dc9e1139f] #3 /usr/local/samba/lib/libsamba-util.so.0(+0x2107d) [0x7f0dc9e1107d] #4 /usr/local/samba/lib/libsamba-util.so.0(+0x21092) [0x7f0dc9e11092] ``` I also tried stracing smbd. There is some trace log: ``` fcntl(22, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_RDLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=28064, l_len=1}) = 0 fcntl(22, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_UNLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=28064, l_len=1}) = 0 clock_gettime(CLOCK_BOOTTIME, {84255, 473048526}) = 0 write(1, "smbldap_search_ext: base => [sam"..., 123) = 123 clock_gettime(CLOCK_BOOTTIME, {...

...1 +#define F_UNLCK 2 + +#define F_EXLCK 4 +#define F_SHLCK 8 + +#define F_INPROGRESS 16 + +#define LOCK_SH 1 +#define LOCK_EX 2 +#define LOCK_NB 4 +#define LOCK_UN 8 + +#define LOCK_MAND 32 +#define LOCK_READ 64 +#define LOCK_WRITE 128 +#define LOCK_RW 192 + +typedef struct flock { + short l_type; + short l_whence; + loff_t l_start; + loff_t l_len; + pid_t l_pid; +} flock_t; + +#define F_LINUX_SPECIFIC_BASE 1024 + +#endif /* _KLIBC_ARCHFCNTL_H */ diff --git a/usr/include/arch/mips/klibc/archsetjmp.h b/usr/include/arch/mips/klibc/archsetjmp.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1fbe83e --...

Hello, Iam facing a problem in locking of files across samba shares. We have samba 3.0.10 running on Solaris 9 with the smb.conf as follows. # Global parameters [global] workgroup = NMUINT netbios name = NMUINTFS interfaces = <IP> bind interfaces only = Yes security = DOMAIN password server = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX log level = 1 ldap