Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "l_array".
Did you mean:
_array
2004 May 09
0
[LLVMdev] Testing LLVM on OS X
...i = 0; i < 1000; ++i)
> Array[i] += X;
> }
>
> Compile with -O3 on OS/X gave me this:
>
> _test:
> mflr r5
> bcl 20,31,"L00000000001$pb"
> "L00000000001$pb":
> mflr r2
> mtlr r5
> addis r4,r2,ha16(L_Array$non_lazy_ptr-"L00000000001$pb")
> li r2,0
> lwz r9,lo16(L_Array$non_lazy_ptr-"L00000000001$pb")(r4)
> li r4,1000
> mtctr r4
> L9:
> lwzx r7,r2,r9 ; load
> add r6,r7,r3 ; add
> stwx...
2004 May 04
0
[LLVMdev] Testing LLVM on OS X
On Tue, 4 May 2004, Patrick Flanagan wrote:
> I was able to run through all the C/C++ benchmarks in SPEC using LLVM.
> I'm on OS X 10.3.3. I did a quick comparison between LLVM (latest from
> CVS as of 4/27) and gcc 3.3 (Apple's build 20030304). For simplicity's
> sake, the only flag I used was -O3 for each compiler and I was using
> the C backend to generate native
2004 May 04
2
[LLVMdev] Testing LLVM on OS X
I was able to run through all the C/C++ benchmarks in SPEC using LLVM.
I'm on OS X 10.3.3. I did a quick comparison between LLVM (latest from
CVS as of 4/27) and gcc 3.3 (Apple's build 20030304). For simplicity's
sake, the only flag I used was -O3 for each compiler and I was using
the C backend to generate native code for PPC.
Most of the LLVM results were close to gcc
2004 May 04
6
[LLVMdev] Testing LLVM on OS X
...ion:
int Array[1000];
void test(int X) {
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 1000; ++i)
Array[i] += X;
}
Compile with -O3 on OS/X gave me this:
_test:
mflr r5
bcl 20,31,"L00000000001$pb"
"L00000000001$pb":
mflr r2
mtlr r5
addis r4,r2,ha16(L_Array$non_lazy_ptr-"L00000000001$pb")
li r2,0
lwz r9,lo16(L_Array$non_lazy_ptr-"L00000000001$pb")(r4)
li r4,1000
mtctr r4
L9:
lwzx r7,r2,r9 ; load
add r6,r7,r3 ; add
stwx r6,r2,r9 ; store
addi...