search for: l97

...pn.org/documentation/The-meta_002dprotocol.html#The-meta_002dprotocol) seem to imply direct data packets are possible. 3. What is the routing behavior when multiple nodes advertise the same subnet at the same weight? I think this is it: https://github.com/gsliepen/tinc/blob/master/src/subnet.c#L87-L97, and it means that it's a lexical comparison between names, which will always be the same. We would prefer they be load balanced, due to... 4. Is it correct that tinc 1.0 is still single-threaded? I've seen some references to it becoming multithreaded, but have only ever observed it workin...

...&]C=6UE;G13971U<"`J0UA?0S)$7TUE=&AO M9`T**D1E9F%U;'1#6%]#,D1?365T:&]D.B!$9693:6UP;&5X#0HJ0UA?0S)$ M7TUE=&AO9"!$9693:6UP;&5X+U!R:6YT97(G<R!$969A=6QT.B`B)5-#25!0 M1#H@1$9%($]-7T1U<&QE>%]-;V1E(%!R:6YT97(G<R(-"BI#6%]#,D1?365T M:&]D(%-I;7!L97@O4VEM<&QE>#H@(B530TE04$0Z($1&12!/35]$=7!L97A? M36]D92!00E]$=7!L97A?3F]N92(-"BI#6%]#,D1?365T:&]D($1U<&QE>%1O M92]$=7!L97@@:&5A9"!T;R!T;V4Z("(E4T-)4%!$.B!$1D4@3TU?1'5P;&5X M7TUO9&4@4$)?1'5P2&5A9%1O5&]E(@T**D-87T,R1%]-971H;V0@1'...

Hello, I''m writing my first puppet function rspec test and am having a problem which I don''t see how to solve. The function (and the test) involve access to files through the File Server. In order for the function (and the test) to work I need to pass "--fileserverconf=fileserver.conf" parameter to Puppet. So far I haven''t found a way to do that. If I

...> > Although there might be spurious warning (which is a check for sanity > more than an error) while slave interface is up, slave rename had been > handled quite well there, no matter which state slave is at. > > https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/blob/master/zebra/if_netlink.c#L97 > > The FRR users are supposed to operate on failover master interface > anyway. No one is expected to configure those passive interfaces for > routing. > >> VPP > Nothing particular was seen for this one. The netlink usage there > doesn't seem related to my chan...

...> 002dprotocol.html#The-meta_002dprotocol) seem to imply direct data > packets are possible. > > 3. What is the routing behavior when multiple nodes advertise the same > subnet at the same weight? I think this is it: https://github.com/ > gsliepen/tinc/blob/master/src/subnet.c#L87-L97, and it means that it's a > lexical comparison between names, which will always be the same. We would > prefer they be load balanced, due to... > > 4. Is it correct that tinc 1.0 is still single-threaded? I've seen some > references to it becoming multithreaded, but have only...

Hi In my program , When libvirtd restart , the old libvirtd connection(virConnectPtr) has to reconnect, Before usr old virConnectPtr , I call virConnectIsAlive. but when I restart libvirtd , virConnectIsAlive return 1, and I continue other operate use the old virConnectPtr, program will receive signal pipe. I use libvirt event. before any api use, I call virEventRegisterDefaultImpl, and

...unction before quitting the query-preprocess one). > > Here's a first try at it: > https://github.com/zykh/nut/tree/nutdrv_qx_preprocess_command That would work for me too. I'm looking forward to the merge. [1] https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/blob/master/drivers/nutdrv_qx.h#L97-L101 [2] https://github.com/nickma82/nut/commit/ce330a3873fd0a9243a61258db243a6eee=327e65

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I would like to propose an interface change/extension, in order to be able to clearly differ from a PRE_SEND and a POST_RECEIVE item_t->preprocess-ing calls. IMHO there is no option to differ from item->preprocess(..), called from [1] and called from [2], at the moment. My idea is to extend the item_t->preprocess(..) with an additional

On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 12:52:47AM -0400, Si-Wei Liu wrote: > When a netdev appears through hot plug then gets enslaved by a failover > master that is already up and running, the slave will be opened > right away after getting enslaved. Today there's a race that userspace > (udev) may fail to rename the slave if the kernel (net_failover) > opens the slave earlier than when the

On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 12:52:47AM -0400, Si-Wei Liu wrote: > When a netdev appears through hot plug then gets enslaved by a failover > master that is already up and running, the slave will be opened > right away after getting enslaved. Today there's a race that userspace > (udev) may fail to rename the slave if the kernel (net_failover) > opens the slave earlier than when the

...Vv_-M at AaZu#;NdB!b03*%tv6C{_c%3d=R~N&4?5m$mXS(-d(Ps;^iuy# z&VwkRw}68vkQ8 at 2vY(ylNH5eYSWpe%iI+XVU<-0B0I6q>qo(y*$CQ&^DbwCKc*gic zE>MoLy=2$*-0Zea;<eNM+XQe}fY59p<<aV+h&}Lh*1%fK%2#QiD(=asUpke;HfZkX zRuJJ{nUmV|{3hd_pO~Wq6o>e5fQ=a1Kc|)ArHsfwNo$nk$%pg?<Q7^0Grq2l=`l97 zR*j#%FJ}`jB{kZt$*nx|7WTYWte0w7!n`d9nD5pO!?*Jkc(mk;owYK2<anDsF%ZyD z#nl<3SG3 at X4uHP(V6MoygCu!^wvLydG38iK*+See`C8z&w=~hO`t;9RT6IMI!Pa+P zWdSrLZ*;c(uzZJ)^H0X^WN(!Gc*ZYkY~n+CX>d*kTn at LEj#CmK8E^t?qcBYeh+!{i z8#L6qR}pZGt at lhTlJS;``q_%T{`{&{*%=UpEjNv>yNxb2fFLrfbTEzfRbR-3jSPr>...