search for: l90

...ehavior? Thanks, Seiya [1]: https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blob;f=bfd/mach-o.c;h=d9edef2871d83b53280b613935c068e4327f3270;hb=HEAD#l364 [2]: https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blob;f=bfd/mach-o.c;h=d9edef2871d83b53280b613935c068e4327f3270;hb=HEAD#l90

...270;hb=HEAD#l364 <https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blob;f=bfd/mach-o.c;h=d9edef2871d83b53280b613935c068e4327f3270;hb=HEAD#l364> > [2]: https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blob;f=bfd/mach-o.c;h=d9edef2871d83b53280b613935c068e4327f3270;hb=HEAD#l90 <https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blob;f=bfd/mach-o.c;h=d9edef2871d83b53280b613935c068e4327f3270;hb=HEAD#l90> > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/ma...

...ely that the host or the service is not up. > Also, we tend to report > system errors and leave mgmt application figure out how to deal with it. > For instance: > > http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=blob;f=tools/virsh.c;h= > 94bb7ff6c93afa46d31d085eaa5e504f1cca7593;hb=HEAD#l90 Are you indicating that a user should have to read the sourcecode of libvirt and libvirtd to understand their error messages? Please bear in mind that we are humans that use a software and as such the software should be written to be used by humans. I know very well that good error handling is a...

The error message could however give a hint what is going on. It should sax that it is impossible to talk to libvirtd and that it might be stopped. On 9 Aug 2017 2:19 p.m., "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 11:53:54AM +0800, netsurfed wrote: > > Hi all, > > I think it's a bug, when call virDomainGetState after

...s is fine, but it'd be nice to add a comment about what the problems are so we can work on them in future. BTW the informational string given here seems to be wrong - copy and paste error? https://github.com/libguestfs/virt-v2v/blob/8e870da79b5a61513f568b0b81c773084b8d7997/v2v/libosinfo-c.c#L90 Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported. http://fedorapr...

...debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652679 Before I follow this upstream can someone sanity check my configs for me? I understand that much has changed between 3.5 and 3.6 regarding the idmaping. [global] workgroup = CBJ_NT realm = CBJ.LOCAL netbios aliases = CITY-LIZA-L90, CITY-LIZA server string = External FTP Server interfaces = 199.58.55.87/22, lo bind interfaces only = Yes security = ADS obey pam restrictions = Yes passdb backend = tdbsam password server = 199.58.55.25, 199.58.55.50 passwd program =...

...Ultimately, I guess this boils down to what exactly the difference is in > intent between O2 and O3, which seems like a never-ending discussion... > The definitions I am working from are here: https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project/blob/master/llvm/include/llvm/Passes/PassBuilder.h#L81-L90 I've highlighted the part that makes me think O3 is better here: the code size increases (and thus compile time increases) don't seem to correspond to runtime improvements. > > Hoping you find this useful, > Very. Once again, this kind of data and analysis is awesome. =D >...

...-i kevin_elliott kevin_elliott:*:24949:10513::/home/CBJ_NT/kevin_elliott:/bin/false 'getent passwd' will only return the local users from /etc/passwd. And the relevant section of smb.conf: [global] workgroup = CBJ_NT realm = CBJ.LOCAL netbios aliases = CITY-LIZA-L90, CITY-LIZA server string = External FTP Server interfaces = 192.0.2.87/32, lo bind interfaces only = Yes security = ADS obey pam restrictions = Yes password server = 192.0.2.25, 192.0.2.50 passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd cha...

...RefSCC has ref edges between {X, Y} and {S, T} in this case? >> I may miss the code handling it. >> > > The ref graph is conservative and so it would have the appropriate edges. > > https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project/blob/master/llvm/lib/Analysis/LazyCallGraph.cpp#L90 > That is where the confusion is -- the findReferences's function body only handles constant operands which may be function addresses. Did I miss something obvious? Another point is that it may not be practical to model edges to indirect targets. For virtual calls, without CHA, each virt...

...pe". Considering that the osinfo_db is kept basically statically this should be fine. > BTW the informational string given here seems to be wrong - copy and > paste error? > > https://github.com/libguestfs/virt-v2v/blob/8e870da79b5a61513f568b0b81c773084b8d7997/v2v/libosinfo-c.c#L90 Oops yes. "Db" and "Os" sadly look too similar... -- Pino Toscano

...es, etc. Suggesting that daemon is not running would be wrong in this case. Also, we tend to report system errors and leave mgmt application figure out how to deal with it. For instance: http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=blob;f=tools/virsh.c;h=94bb7ff6c93afa46d31d085eaa5e504f1cca7593;hb=HEAD#l90 Michal

...n this >>>> case? I may miss the code handling it. >>>> >>> >>> The ref graph is conservative and so it would have the appropriate edges. >>> >>> https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project/blob/master/llvm/lib/Analysis/LazyCallGraph.cpp#L90 >>> >> >> >> That is where the confusion is -- the findReferences's function body only >> handles constant operands which may be function addresses. Did I miss >> something obvious? >> > > It is somewhat subtle. There are 3 potential meanings...

...ately, I guess this boils down to what exactly the difference is in intent between O2 and O3, which seems like a never-ending discussion... > > The definitions I am working from are here: > https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project/blob/master/llvm/include/llvm/Passes/PassBuilder.h#L81-L90 <https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project/blob/master/llvm/include/llvm/Passes/PassBuilder.h#L81-L90> > > I've highlighted the part that makes me think O3 is better here: the code size increases (and thus compile time increases) don't seem to correspond to runtime improveme...

What''s the recommended way to catch errors like this: NoMethodError in Register#confirm Showing app/views/register/confirm.rhtml where line #4 raised: undefined method `namen'' for nil:NilClass I get this error when someone does somethinh like: http://.........../register/confirm?email=jkdsfadslkjflksd If I make: remail = params[:email] @user = Request.find(:first,

...that has the wrong order. I don't know if that's due to the cat() calls being executed in the wrong order, or if it's simply being printed or buffered in the wrong order. This is the code in question that cat()s to stderr: https://github.com/rstudio/pool/blob/0724ad9/R/scheduler.R#L74-L90 while (TRUE) { tasks <- sort(ls(private$scheduledTasks)) if (length(tasks) == 0) break t <- tasks[[1]] s <- stderr() cat(tasks, "--1--\n", file = s) cat(ls(private$scheduledTasks), "--2--\n", file = s) cat(t...

...e methods with failed implicit null checks to use an explicit null check instead (e.g. [2]). What do you think? Does this make sense? [1]: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/llvm-dev/mMQzIt_8z1Y/cnE7WH1HNaoJ [2]: https://github.com/openjdk-mirror/jdk7u-hotspot/blob/master/src/share/vm/opto/lcm.cpp#L90 -- Sanjoy

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com > wrote: > Hi Sean, > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 4:48 AM, Sean Silva via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > One question is what invariants we want to provide for the visitation. > > > > For example, should a CGSCC pass be able to assume that all

...that has the wrong order. I don't know if that's due to the cat() calls being executed in the wrong order, or if it's simply being printed or buffered in the wrong order. This is the code in question that cat()s to stderr: https://github.com/rstudio/pool/blob/0724ad9/R/scheduler.R#L74-L90 while (TRUE) { tasks <- sort(ls(private$scheduledTasks)) if (length(tasks) == 0) break t <- tasks[[1]] s <- stderr() cat(tasks, "--1--\n", file = s) cat(ls(private$scheduledTasks), "--2--\n", file = s) cat(t...

> > >> I've done some more investigation into the problem, and it is very difficult to pin down. What it looks like is happening is roughly like this: - `p` is an environment and `p$e` is also an environment. - There is a loop. In each iteration, it looks for one item in `p$e`, saves it in a variable `x`, then removes that item from `p$e`. Then it invokes `x()`. The loop runs

...t. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The ref graph is conservative and so it would have the appropriate >>>>> edges. >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project/blob/master/llvm/lib/Analysis/LazyCallGraph.cpp#L90 >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> That is where the confusion is -- the findReferences's function body >>>> only handles constant operands which may be function addresses. Did I miss >>>> something obvious? >>>> >>...