Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "l79".
Did you mean:
79
2017 Apr 03
3
Very hard to reproduce bug (?) in R-devel
...t, at levels
4 and 7 on the call stack), and in the inner call (7), a variable,
`task`, does not have the correct value. It should be a function, but
it isn't; it's either NULL or some other non-function value.
That code is here:
https://github.com/rstudio/pool/blob/f7e52a3/R/scheduler.R#L79-L81
Note that there's a `force(task)` a couple lines above, which is
commented out. If that is uncommented, the test passes, even though
calling force() there shouldn't make a difference. Also, calling
`format(1)` at that location also causes the test to pass.
I've written instruction...
2006 May 17
2
error handling in upssched.c
While looking into Laurent Lesage's problem with upssched, I noticed
something in exec_cmd():
http://boxster.ghz.cc/projects/nut/browser/trunk/clients/upssched.c#L79
In the man pages for system(3) on both OS X and Linux (Debian sarge),
I do not see any mention of errno being set. The error code is
returned by system, and I am wondering if the "file not found" error
that Laurent saw was actually masking another problem.
I personally don't use ups...
2017 Apr 03
0
Very hard to reproduce bug (?) in R-devel
...the call stack), and in the inner call (7), a variable,
> `task`, does not have the correct value. It should be a function, but
> it isn't; it's either NULL or some other non-function value.
>
> That code is here:
> https://github.com/rstudio/pool/blob/f7e52a3/R/scheduler.R#L79-L81
> Note that there's a `force(task)` a couple lines above, which is
> commented out. If that is uncommented, the test passes, even though
> calling force() there shouldn't make a difference. Also, calling
> `format(1)` at that location also causes the test to pass.
>
>...
2018 Jan 08
3
SFTP chroot: Writable root
On Sun, 2018-01-07 at 18:41 +0000, halfdog wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I created a page to demonstrate, what would happen when chroot
> root directory is writeable. In fact, code execution is possible
> already, when only /etc and /bin are writable. I also tried to
> escape the chroot jail, but that did not work for non-root users.
>
> As the 2009 CVE activities mention,
2009 Jul 23
1
[PATCH server] changes required for fedora rawhide inclusion.
...h}9^pS;0PPguG~h+R
zOMq7ZuK~^h-UPf2co*<K;6uPifKLFQ0loly3HTcDE#P~=kAR;6zW^F=2pJ6+3m6ZW
z2$&3*!g%MY2&Xgt&lw13BAf+4pZ+-;;T*>QJeTpDc>vhWTj#^BEC4J7falgl2p2Qn
z3*+py1m%|jRsdEpJ`nl;T7&pnz&gNszy`oZz$VmpFXR8-jQAFW_aWR0*ap}RxF7HU
z=no=%2=EAC2hxu*{-4JY-wD_S*bR6Buotioupe-Mae9#Pkxwz+^l79I1D*jq%XkAh
zBG7X(rU5-KVn+o!#<+SMTqgi05q|;UDZpvK8P*I3x^sxVA!LL_?ZI>)`VQb-z<YrA
z0UrQx${;vp;6#gQLi!`X$AC}JrBB5a2=^56F9BaO;|0~=Bgb(*asq76ByLRRhB1Ys
zxv5A`158KW41_ZQvpHvT5Y7e611tb6<i-M&L14 at m<rags1h5pa46q!q0x%p^5<Xef
z>$(r=t$@b>I{~{mGQ>G%HxhdQPXP7;o&@X%8~_~ThR-nmh9(...