Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "l771".
Did you mean:
771
2017 Apr 03
3
Very hard to reproduce bug (?) in R-devel
...) at testthat/test-scheduling.R:13
3: private$callback()
4: self$protect({
task()
})
5: private$refCount$release()
6: private$callback()
7: self$protect({
task()
})
8: force(expr)
You can see complete logs on Travis here:
https://travis-ci.org/rstudio/pool/jobs/217301804#L747-L771
In the test, a re-entrant function is called (self$protect, at levels
4 and 7 on the call stack), and in the inner call (7), a variable,
`task`, does not have the correct value. It should be a function, but
it isn't; it's either NULL or some other non-function value.
That code is here:...
2017 Apr 03
0
Very hard to reproduce bug (?) in R-devel
...t; 4: self$protect({
> task()
> })
> 5: private$refCount$release()
> 6: private$callback()
> 7: self$protect({
> task()
> })
> 8: force(expr)
>
> You can see complete logs on Travis here:
> https://travis-ci.org/rstudio/pool/jobs/217301804#L747-L771
>
> In the test, a re-entrant function is called (self$protect, at levels
> 4 and 7 on the call stack), and in the inner call (7), a variable,
> `task`, does not have the correct value. It should be a function, but
> it isn't; it's either NULL or some other non-function value...