search for: l685

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "l685".

Did you mean: 685
2023 Jan 09
1
Shouldn't "Loading" be "Attaching" when referring to library() calls?
...efore running library(): "Loading required package: %s" https://github.com/r-devel/r-svn/blob/4198a2941b702d965bb2374c2b908f48c369f40a/src/library/base/R/library.R#L967-L968 https://github.com/r-devel/r-svn/blob/4198a2941b702d965bb2374c2b908f48c369f40a/src/library/base/R/library.R#L684-L685 Shouldn't "Loading" be "Attaching" instead? My understanding is "a package is loaded" is equivalent to "isNamespaceLoaded()", i.e., loadNamespace() was run. And that "a package is attached" is equivalent to "pkg %in% .packages()", i....
2023 Jan 10
1
Shouldn't "Loading" be "Attaching" when referring to library() calls?
...> "Loading required package: %s" > https://github.com/r-devel/r-svn/blob/4198a2941b702d965bb2374c2b908f48c369f40a/src/library/base/R/library.R#L967-L968 > https://github.com/r-devel/r-svn/blob/4198a2941b702d965bb2374c2b908f48c369f40a/src/library/base/R/library.R#L684-L685 > Shouldn't "Loading" be "Attaching" instead? Good question... I had asked myself as well a couple of times. The vagueness is mostly "historical" in the sense that originally R (nor S) had namespaces. OTOH, attach(.) has always worked for data frames (a...
2014 Apr 17
1
Re: LXC + USB passthrough = Operation not permitted
...b881d83b1#file-libvirtd-log-L257-L266 > [4] > https://gist.github.com/filmaj/207ab3c09f5b881d83b1#file-libvirtd-log-L296 > [5] > https://gist.github.com/filmaj/207ab3c09f5b881d83b1#file-libvirtd-log-L302 > [6] > https://gist.github.com/filmaj/207ab3c09f5b881d83b1#file-libvirtd-log-L685 > [7] > https://gist.github.com/filmaj/207ab3c09f5b881d83b1#file-libvirtd-log-L752-L799 > [8] > https://gist.github.com/filmaj/207ab3c09f5b881d83b1#file-libvirtd-log-L1075 > [9] > https://gist.github.com/filmaj/207ab3c09f5b881d83b1#file-libvirtd-log-L1090 > [10] > http://lib...
2014 Apr 17
0
Re: LXC + USB passthrough = Operation not permitted
....github.com/filmaj/207ab3c09f5b881d83b1#file-libvirtd-log-L257-L266 [4] https://gist.github.com/filmaj/207ab3c09f5b881d83b1#file-libvirtd-log-L296 [5] https://gist.github.com/filmaj/207ab3c09f5b881d83b1#file-libvirtd-log-L302 [6] https://gist.github.com/filmaj/207ab3c09f5b881d83b1#file-libvirtd-log-L685 [7] https://gist.github.com/filmaj/207ab3c09f5b881d83b1#file-libvirtd-log-L752-L799 [8] https://gist.github.com/filmaj/207ab3c09f5b881d83b1#file-libvirtd-log-L1075 [9] https://gist.github.com/filmaj/207ab3c09f5b881d83b1#file-libvirtd-log-L1090 [10] http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=blob;f=src...
2014 Apr 17
2
Re: LXC + USB passthrough = Operation not permitted
Further followups! We are correlating DEBUG-level output from libvirt with the libvirt 1.2.2 code to try to figure out what libvirt is doing under the hood. Even though we have the log level set to 1 (info) in our libvirtd.conf, we are not seeing the VIR_DEBUG() [1] statements being printed out. There are tons of other presumably-debug lines of output showing up in our log. We are sort of