Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "l6700".
Did you mean:
6700
2019 Sep 12
2
Load combine pass
...blob/23bbeb52f392d88bf0d0527392a7a11561ee09c0/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp#L6872
>
> Later a similar transform was introduced fro stores:
>
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/23bbeb52f392d88bf0d0527392a7a11561ee09c0/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp#L6700
>
> There is no load widening on the IR level as of now.
>
> Artur
>
> On 11 Sep 2019, at 04:47, Paweł Bylica <chfast at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Can I ask what is the status of load widening. It seems there is no load
> widening on IR at all.
>
> /...
2019 Sep 25
2
Load combine pass
...92d88bf0d0527392a7a11561ee09c0/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp#L6872
>>
>> Later a similar transform was introduced fro stores:
>> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/23bbeb52f392d88bf0d0527392a7a11561ee09c0/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp#L6700
>>
>> There is no load widening on the IR level as of now.
>>
>> Artur
>>
>>> On 11 Sep 2019, at 04:47, Paweł Bylica <chfast at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:chfast at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>&g...
2019 Sep 11
2
Load combine pass
Hi,
Can I ask what is the status of load widening. It seems there is no load
widening on IR at all.
// Paweł
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 1:49 PM Artur Pilipenko via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Philip and I talked about this is person. Given the fact that load
> widening in presence of atomics is irreversible transformation we agreed
> that we don't want to do