search for: l500

...t;,"16I2", "I1","I5","I1","I3","I2", "A4","3A1","A2","A1"), header = FALSE,skip=0,sep="@", col.names = paste(idno,empmo,empyr,birthmo,birthyr,sex,race,teno,testmo,testyr, testtyp,L500,L1k,L2k,L3k,L4k,L6k,L8k,RT1k,R500,R1k,R2k,R3k,R4k,R6k,R8k, HPD,dept,shift,TWA,envclas,jobcode,hobby.med.STS,audclas,disp), row.names = (idno) )) I also tried a separate dimnames statement like so: dimnames(AN35)[[2]] <- c("idno","empmo","empyr","birt...

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 2:21 PM Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > I think I found the bug. The tools::checkRd function only processes > \Sexpr's with "stage=render". I think the author (who might have been > me, I forget) assumed that would imply all the earlier stages as well, > but apparently it doesn't. > > So you could use that as

...ing quantile(). However, do you think c.factor() can potentially break more functions? For example, with this new change, classification from the partykit package using predict() comes back NA because of this: https://github.com/cran/partykit/blob/597245ef3dfc98411ce919b74c68ba565f077c47/R/party.R#L500 I understand that most of the fixes will probably be simple with as.numeric() or as.integer(), but tracing down these breaks can be time-consuming <https://twitter.com/trang1618/status/1260906905041432578>. What about a warning whenever code that would trigger c.factor() is called? This way...

...eems like there is no clean workaround here. >> >> Thanks again, >> G. > > Btw. would it make sense to just allow \Sexpr as a top level section? > Maybe here: > https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/98e9999eb0e8616550632a1675e4d2dbe630d5e4/src/library/tools/R/RdConv2.R#L500-L503 > > At least if stage=render, there is no way to check if the returned > value is always a valid top level section, anyway. > If it is not a valid section (or \Sexpr returns some bad markup in > general), then the user gets a render-time error, > but with stage=render I gues...

...xdp_page != page)) > > - __free_pages(xdp_page, 0); > > It seems __free_pages() and put_page() is used interchangeably here. > Perhaps using __free_pages() have performance reason? As the comment below: > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.3-rc3/source/net/core/page_pool.c#L500 Yes, but now we don't seem to be very good to distinguish it. But I think it doesn't matter. This logic is rare under actual situation. Thanks. > > > - > > if (xdp_buff_has_frags(&xdp)) { > > shinfo = xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff(&xdp); > >...

...section is dropped. > > Seems like there is no clean workaround here. > > Thanks again, > G. Btw. would it make sense to just allow \Sexpr as a top level section? Maybe here: https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/98e9999eb0e8616550632a1675e4d2dbe630d5e4/src/library/tools/R/RdConv2.R#L500-L503 At least if stage=render, there is no way to check if the returned value is always a valid top level section, anyway. If it is not a valid section (or \Sexpr returns some bad markup in general), then the user gets a render-time error, but with stage=render I guess one cannot do better. G.

Hi, I have asterisk running a single T1 card with a connection to a nortel CS 1000. All calls to extensions, local and long distance are working just fine. My issue is this: The nortel CS 1000 supports connections to and intercom system that is just line level audio to speakers. When my PRI tries to call this "extension" it is never answered so my AGI never runs to play a message

Hi, In R-devel (2020-05-17 r78478) quantile() type 1 seems to behave a little bit strange for some ordered factors: quantile(factor(1:3, ordered = TRUE), 0.5, type = 1) returns ?2? as expected. But quantile(factor(2:4, ordered = TRUE), 0.5, type = 1) returns ?4? and quantile(factor(3:5, ordered = TRUE), 0.5, type = 1) returns ?NA?. Furthermore, the function returns ?NA? for calls like

...vice cfg80211 uvcvideo drm_kms_helper snd drm videodev soundcore vhba v4l2_compat_ioctl32 eeprom_93cx6 snd_page_alloc psmouse i2c_algo_bit serio_raw sparse_keymap lp video parport r8169 [ 619.850114] [ 619.850114] Pid: 5, comm: kworker/u:0 Not tainted 2.6.38-8-server #42-Ubuntu TOSHIBA Satellite L500/KSWAA [ 619.850114] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8150aa99>] [<ffffffff8150aa99>] netlink_has_listeners+0x9/0x50 [ 619.850114] RSP: 0018:ffff880137907bf0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 619.850114] RAX: ffff88009dce0000 RBX: ffff8801075c5000 RCX: 000000000000ffff [ 619.850114] RDX: 000000000000000e RSI:...

Hi, I have a Toshiba Satellite L500 Laptop running 64bit Linux Mint Debian Edition 201109. The laptop has ATI Radeon M92 (HD 4500 / 5000) graphics. This is based on Debian testing and because at present there is no WINE in the testing repositories, I have installed 1.3.30 from: http://frickelplatz.de/debian/ This seems to work f...