search for: l431

...bottom because your loads/stores aren't atomic. The fact that LLVM doesn't actually do this is just because I didn't put much effort into alias analysis for fences; see http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/AliasAnalysis.h?revision=182755&view=markup#l431. -Eli -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130612/6a6b1ad4/attachment.html>

...bottom because your loads/stores aren't atomic. The fact that LLVM doesn't actually do this is just because I didn't put much effort into alias analysis for fences; see http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Analysis/AliasAnalysis.h?revision=182755&view=markup#l431 . -Eli -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130613/5cad899f/attachment.html>

Hi, I have the following test case: define void @foo(<2 x float>* noalias nocapture %out, <2 x float>* noalias nocapture %data0) nounwind { entry: %val1 = load <2 x float>* %data0, align 8 store <2 x float> %val1, <2 x float>* %out, align 8 fence acq_rel %val2 = load <2 x float>* %data0, align 8 store <2 x float> %val2, <2 x float>*

On 7 June 2013 17:52, Dallman, John <john.dallman at siemens.com> wrote: > Is it possible for the debug information to mark all the instructions that arise > from a > language statement as coming from that statement, even though the instructions may > be widely scattered? Yes. > Instructions whose effects > are used in the logic from more than one statement would have to

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2474 Bug ID: 2474 Summary: Enabling ECDSA in PKCS#11 support for ssh-agent Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.1p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh-agent Assignee: unassigned-bugs

Le lun. 9 d?c. 2019 ? 05:43, Tomas Kalibera <tomas.kalibera at gmail.com> a ?crit : > On 12/7/19 10:32 PM, Laurent Gautier wrote: > > Thanks for the quick response Tomas. > > The same error is indeed happening when trying to have a zero-length > variable name in an environment. The surprising bit is then "why is this > happening during parsing" (that is why