search for: l31

...ll be also an element of another matrix. l <- matrix(nrow=nrow(load),ncol=ncol(load)) for(i in 1:nrow(load)) { for(j in 1:ncol(load)) { l[i,j]=paste("l",i,j,sep="")}} > l [,1] [,2] [1,] "l11" "l12" [2,] "l21" "l22" [3,] "l31" "l32" > l11 [1] 3 > l12 [1] 0 > l21 [1] 1 > l22 [1] 4 > l31 [1] 1 > l32 [1] 3 Let's say, I need to take the derivative of (l11*l21+l12*l22) with respect to l11,l12,l21,l22,l31,l32. > numericDeriv(quote(l11*l21+l12*l22), c(t(l),recursive=TRUE)) [1] 3 attr...

...ckage. I can't figure out how to represent the residual errors for the observed variables for a CFA model. (Once I get this working I need to add some further constraints.) Here is what I've tried: model.sa <- specify.model() F1 -> X1,l11, NA F1 -> X2,l21, NA F1 -> X3,l31, NA F1 -> X4,l41, NA F1 -> X5, NA, 0.20 F2 -> X1,l12, NA F2 -> X2,l22, NA F2 -> X3,l32, NA F2 -> X4,l42, NA F2 -> X6, NA, 0.25 F1 <-> F2,g12, 1 F1 <-> F1,g11, 1 F2 <-> F2,g22, 1 X1 <-> X1, NA, 1 X2 <-> X2, NA, 1...

Does anyone know if there's a reason that proc.time() uses cat() rather than message() to print the output when there has been an error in the process of timing? line 31 of time.R, https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/e5b21d0397c607883ff25cca379687b86933d730/src/library/base/R/time.R#L31 on.exit(cat("Timing stopped at:", ppt(proc.time() - time), "\n")) This means that as far as I can tell the general way to make sure there is no output from a timed statement is ... tt1 <- capture.output(tt0 <- suppressMessages(suppressWarnings( tr...

The bot hiccupped earlier but looks stable now. The average turnaround seems to be 3.5 hours. clang: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/clang/index.html lld: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/lld/index.html polly: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/polly/index.html > On Sep 23, 2016, at 11:58 PM, Tobias Grosser via llvm-dev

...gt; > This is really not about proc.time(), but about system.time() > [ and I have corrected the 'Subject' accordingly ] .. > > > line 31 of time.R, > > > https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/e5b21d0397c607883ff25cca379687b86933d730/src/library/base/R/time.R#L31 > > > on.exit(cat("Timing stopped at:", ppt(proc.time() - time), "\n")) > > > This means that as far as I can tell the general way to make sure > > there is no output from a timed statement is ... > > > tt1 <- capture.output(tt0 &l...

...test-s LLVM is really good at tail call elimination so it replaced all calls between handlers to just branches. Now getting back to the problem, note that the handlers call to 'puts' so LR register gets changed. See https://gist.github.com/amitin/7df4fbb806c0b48eb5bcaf614e5d93cd#file-test-s-L31 Thus, when the execution flow reaches 'terminatorFunc' it will branch to an unknown location. See https://gist.github.com/amitin/7df4fbb806c0b48eb5bcaf614e5d93cd#file-test-s-L73 The same IR code works fine for x86_64. You can verify it by changing the triple to x86_64 (uncomment the test.l...

...e.path(SPARK_HOME, "R/lib/SparkR/R/SparkR"), envir = parent.frame(), filter = function(x) TRUE) } # parallelize() works now Please help me understand what goes wrong. Here is the whole repro: https://gist.github.com/zoltanctoth/971ae374dace93de12f0#file-sparkr-rstudio-parallelize-r-L21-L31 And the relevant files from the Spark installation: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/0xp2wgkbrl7ov64/AAAHRWdMecGMkVdo0GUs6fmYa?dl=0 Thanks, Best, Zoltan -- https://www.linkedin.com/in/zoltanctoth [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...t; in the process of timing? This is really not about proc.time(), but about system.time() [ and I have corrected the 'Subject' accordingly ] .. > line 31 of time.R, > https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/e5b21d0397c607883ff25cca379687b86933d730/src/library/base/R/time.R#L31 > on.exit(cat("Timing stopped at:", ppt(proc.time() - time), "\n")) > This means that as far as I can tell the general way to make sure > there is no output from a timed statement is ... > tt1 <- capture.output(tt0 <- suppressMessages(suppres...

Hi all, I am having hard time figuring out how I should use the API for JIT in LLVM 6. In LLVM 3.9 I am used to adding all objects at once and emitAndFinalizing them all: handle = objectLayer.addObjectSet(objectFiles, memoryManager, resolver); objectLayer.emitAndFinalize(handle); In LLVM 6.0 the objects are added one by one: auto handle = objectLayer.addObject(objectFile, resolver).get();

On Sunday, 8 October 2017 23:26:53 CET Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > We defined a number of functions on lists which are not provided by > the standard library. As with Char and String, let's extend List to > add these new functions to a List pseudo-module (really > Std_utils.List, but called List when you ‘open Std_utils’). > > The initial exported functions are all List

Hi- Is it safe to use the zerofree utility on an ext4 partition inside an LVM with guestfish? I know zerofree works on ext4, but I am unsure about LVM. The info page uses the syntax "zerofree <device>", so using the info page example, could I (safely) do something like the following? $ guestfish Welcome to guestfish, the libguestfs filesystem interactive shell for

1. This relates to the package *rhdf5* and its implementation of the HDF5 dataspace interface. I am asking for an example of how other people who use this package make use of the HDF5 data space interface exposed by the library. Longer answer: As per my understanding, the dataspace interface exposes data locations within a dataspace, but even while retrieving data from an hdf5 file using methods

Hello. For our project needs we implemented a custom calling convention. The main goals are to pass function arguments in registers and always use tailcall optimization for calls to functions with our CC when applicable. Function arguments are always pointers and the maximum number of arguments is 5. No frame pointer register is in use for this CC. No varargs. Finally, there are not any

On 2/11/20 11:15 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Since commit 86fdb48c6a5362d66865493d9d2172166f99722e we have stored > the connection object in thread-local storage. > > In this very large, but mostly mechanical change we stop passing the > connection pointer around everywhere, and instead use the value stored > in thread-local storage. > > This assumes a 1-1 mapping

On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 04:49:55PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > The next strict knob: allow the user to pass unknown flags across the > wire (this is different than passing a known flag at the wrong time). > > It is interesting to note that NBD only permits 16 bits of flags, but > we have a signature that takes uint32_t; if we wanted, we could pack > libnbd-specific flags in the

With the ATI bug I was hitting earlier fixed, only my btrfs partition continues to show high cpu usage for some operations. Rsync, git pull, git checkout and svn up are typicall operations which trigger the high cpu usage. As an example, this perf report is from using git checkout to change to a new branch; the change needed to checkout 208 files out of about 1600 total files. du(1) reports

...alizer, i16 %Sl22, i32 0 %B28 = udiv i16 %Sl11, -1 %ZE = zext i1 true to i32 %Sl29 = select i1 true, i8 -99, i8 33 %Cmp30 = fcmp ord double 0xC275146F92573C4, 0x16FB351AF5F9C998 br i1 %Cmp30, label %CF256, label %CF271 CF271: ; preds = %CF256 %L31 = load i8, i8* %0 store i64 %L5, i64* %Sl %E32 = extractelement <4 x i16> zeroinitializer, i32 2 %Shuff33 = shufflevector <1 x i32> zeroinitializer, <1 x i32> zeroinitializer, <1 x i32> <i32 1> %I34 = insertelement <4 x i16> zeroinitializer, i16 %Sl11, i3...

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking