search for: l194

...so I cannot seem to find it. The reason I ask is that we are running out of space for our own DIFlags and would like to nail this down before deciding on an approach. Thanks! Sohail [1] The code in question: https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/master/include/llvm/IR/DebugInfoMetadata.h#L194 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180716/2f01fd98/attachment.html>

...o pop that too. > Yeah, we expect a complicated dance to re-order the stack to get the correct return address into the correct place. You can see the sequence in the comments here: https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project-20170507/blob/master/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86RetpolineThunks.cpp#L179-L194 > > I expected the emitted code for a *call* using the thunk to look more > like > > jmp 2f > 1: pushl -0x20(%ebp) # cmp_func > jmp __x86_thunk_indirect # jmp, not call > 2: call 1b # set up address for cmp_func to return to > Yeah, the sp...

Hi, I am trying to remove key-value pairs from an environments (using C). While adding seems straightforward with `Rf_defineVar()`, I cannot find a function to remove objects from a given environment. Would anyone know if there is such a function ? Best, Laurent

...ended to specify the hypervisor, and qemu-img is not a hypervisor. > but qemu-img is still not taken from the $PATH. Why? qemu-img comes from the PATH, see: https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/blob/master/lib/create.c#L317 https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/blob/master/lib/info.c#L194 External commands run through the guestfs_int_cmd_* mechanism can be displayed by enabling debugging: http://libguestfs.org/guestfs-faq.1.html#debugging-libguestfs so I suggest you enable this to see exactly what's going on. > • I used "--with qemu=qemu-kvm qemu-img" as well as...

...; Yeah, we expect a complicated dance to re-order the stack to get the > correct return address into the correct place. > > You can see the sequence in the comments here: > https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project-20170507/blob/master/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86RetpolineThunks.cpp#L179-L194 Great, thanks. > Anyways, it appears that we have the first case where my suspicions > were borne out and we have somewhat reasonably different ABIs for > some of the thunks. > > How should we name them to distinguish things?  For now it's only ever going to be used by LLVM s...

On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 02:21 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 01:18 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > > > > For now I'm just going to attempt to work around it like this in the > > kernel, so I can concentrate on the retpoline bits: > >  http://david.woodhou.se/clang-percpu-hack.patch > > 32-bit doesn't boot. Built without

On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 01:18 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > > For now I'm just going to attempt to work around it like this in the > kernel, so I can concentrate on the retpoline bits: >  http://david.woodhou.se/clang-percpu-hack.patch 32-bit doesn't boot. Built without CONFIG_RETPOLINE and with Clang 5.0 (and the above patch) it does. I'm rebuilding a Release build of

...mit I mentioned - >> https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/commit/207fed2282 - which added >> the exponent checks, was from 2012 and should be in 2.7.4 as well :-\ >> >> Checked: it is - >> https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/blob/v2.7.4/drivers/belkin-hid.c#L157-L194 >> >> Are the two tests running on otherwise the same HW/OS setup? >> >> Jim >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 9:01?PM Juan Carlos Fischer < >> juancarlos.fischer at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hello! >>> Thanks for answeri...

...://github.com/networkupstools/nut/commit/207fed2282 - which added >>>> the exponent checks, was from 2012 and should be in 2.7.4 as well :-\ >>>> >>>> Checked: it is - >>>> https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/blob/v2.7.4/drivers/belkin-hid.c#L157-L194 >>>> >>>> Are the two tests running on otherwise the same HW/OS setup? >>>> >>>> Jim >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 9:01?PM Juan Carlos Fischer < >>>> juancarlos.fischer at gmail.com> wro...

...://github.com/networkupstools/nut/commit/207fed2282 - which added >>>> the exponent checks, was from 2012 and should be in 2.7.4 as well :-\ >>>> >>>> Checked: it is - >>>> https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/blob/v2.7.4/drivers/belkin-hid.c#L157-L194 >>>> >>>> Are the two tests running on otherwise the same HW/OS setup? >>>> >>>> Jim >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 9:01?PM Juan Carlos Fischer < >>>> juancarlos.fischer at gmail.com> wro...