Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "l1743".
Did you mean:
1743
2019 May 04
2
Vectorizing minimum without function attributes
...h flags, although the vectorizer
seems to ignore these intrinsics.
Beyond this specific case, it would be nice to be sure when is it ever
necessary to set these function attributes, e.g.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/8205a814a691bfa62fed911b58b0a306ab5efe31/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGCall.cpp#L1743-L1750
What would be a way to control the vectorization for `min` without having
to rely on that function attribute? And furthermore, could LLVM
optimizations conceivably depend only on instruction flags, and not ever on
function attributes? What would be necessary to achieve this?
Thanks,
--
Ni...
2019 May 04
2
Vectorizing minimum without function attributes
...zer
> seems to ignore these intrinsics.
>
> Beyond this specific case, it would be nice to be sure when is it ever
> necessary to set these function attributes, e.g.
>
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/8205a814a691bfa62fed911b58b0a306ab5efe31/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGCall.cpp#L1743-L1750
>
> What would be a way to control the vectorization for `min` without having
> to rely on that function attribute? And furthermore, could LLVM
> optimizations conceivably depend only on instruction flags, and not ever on
> function attributes? What would be necessary to achiev...
2019 May 06
2
Vectorizing minimum without function attributes
...s.
>>>
>>> Beyond this specific case, it would be nice to be sure when is it ever
>>> necessary to set these function attributes, e.g.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/8205a814a691bfa62fed911b58b0a306ab5efe31/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGCall.cpp#L1743-L1750
>>>
>>> What would be a way to control the vectorization for `min` without
>>> having to rely on that function attribute? And furthermore, could LLVM
>>> optimizations conceivably depend only on instruction flags, and not ever on
>>> function attri...