Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "l1454".
Did you mean:
01454
2017 Jun 01
5
[SemaCXX] Should we fix test failing due to reverse iteration?
I see that the following test fails if reverse iteration of SmallPtrSet
is enabled:
/clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-loop-analysis.cpp/
This is because in SemaStmt.cpp we iterate SmallPtrSet and output
warnings about the variables not used in the loop.
Expected output: /warning: variables 'i', 'j', and 'k' used in loop
condition not modified/
Output with reverse iteration: