search for: l01

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "l01".

Did you mean: 01
2010 Mar 14
3
likelihood ratio test between glmer and glm
...AIC: 255.97 Number of Fisher Scoring iterations: 3 Based on a discussion found on the R mailing list but dating back to 2008, I have compared the log-likelihoods of the glm model and of the glmer model as follows: lrt <- function (obj1, obj2){ L0 <- logLik(obj1) L1 <- logLik(obj2) L01 <- as.vector(- 2 * (L0 - L1)) df <- attr(L1, "df") - attr(L0, "df") list(L01 = L01, df = df, "p-value" = pchisq(L01, df, lower.tail = FALSE)) } gm0 <- glm(cbind(female,male)~date,family = binomial, data = liz3) gm1 <- glmer(cbind(female,male)~date+(1|da...
2008 Jul 16
4
Likelihood ratio test between glm and glmer fits
Dear list, I am fitting a logistic multi-level regression model and need to test the difference between the ordinary logistic regression from a glm() fit and the mixed effects fit from glmer(), basically I want to do a likelihood ratio test between the two fits. The data are like this: My outcome is a (1,0) for health status, I have several (1,0) dummy variables RURAL, SMOKE, DRINK, EMPLOYED,
2017 Mar 23
4
[LLD] Can't create dynamic relocation R_X86_64_64 against local symbol in readonly segment
Hi, the attached example works with bfd-ld and with gold, but not with lld: $ cat rodatareloc.s ... .align 16 leaq .JTab(%rip), %r10 jmp *(%r10, %rdx, 8) ... .section .rodata .JTab: .quad .L00, .L01, .L02, .L03, .L04, .L05, .L06, .L07 .quad .L08, .L09, .L10, .L11, .L12, .L13, .L14, .L15, .L16 $ gcc -o rodatareloc.s.o -c rodatareloc.s $ lld -o rodatareloc.so -shared rodatareloc.s.o ld: error: rodatareloc.s.o:(.rodata+0x0): can't create dynamic relocation R_X86_64_64 against local symb...
2018 Apr 11
7
[Bug 105977] New: Samsung screen replacement in a Dell laptop brings corrupted display
...ine using the nouveau driver but someday the screen backlight failed and I have to replace the broken WUXGA+ screen with a new one, same specifications except is a glossy screen (not matte). The screen product numbers are almost identical (New screen: Samsung LTN170U1-L02, Old one: Samsung LTN170U1-L01). 5) With the new screen installed the display is corrupted as it shows in the attached pictures. The vertical resolution (1200px) seems to be fine but the horizontal pixels (1920x) are distributed doubling the width (the right half out of the screen). The desktop is chopped and the screen is full...