search for: kws

Shorewall can run without openvpn, but you need it if you want to establish private networks through public structures. -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: info@kws-netzwerke.de [mailto:info@kws-netzwerke.de] Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Juni 2006 12:52 An: 'Shorewall Users' Betreff: AW: [Shorewall-users] OpenVPN question Shorewall is able to work with openvpn but it isn´t a bundle of a vpn/firewall application. Shorewall will make the firewall rules, op...

...methodobject.c:116 #13 0x0009ed50 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx (f=0xab8ed8, throwflag=<value optimized out>) at ../Python/ceval.c:3706 #14 0x000a0970 in PyEval_EvalCodeEx (co=0x4030f848, globals=<value optimized out>, locals=<value optimized out>, args=0x4032a780, argcount=2, kws=0xac7cd8, kwcount=1165320760, defs=0x4032a77c, defcount=1, closure=0x0) at ../Python/ceval.c:2968 #15 0x0009f184 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx (f=0xab8900, throwflag=<value optimized out>) at ../Python/ceval.c:3802 #16 0x0009f7b0 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx (f=0x35ae80, throwflag=<value opti...

...to fit. My dmz host doesn´t like talking to the internet. Talking to fw and to local works very well. I will go on trying and changing mtu, mss and some other things. If there is any idea left, please let me know. Thanks in anvance. Cheers Mike -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: info@kws-netzwerke.de [mailto:info@kws-netzwerke.de] Gesendet: Dienstag, 7. Februar 2006 21:18 An: ''shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net'' Betreff: AW: AW: WG: [Shorewall-users] proxyarp <--> OpenSwan VPN/Internet Shorewall 2.4.2 on left vpn gate with ip x.x.x.14 Shorewall 2.4.1 o...

...first_instr = <optimized out> names = <optimized out> consts = <optimized out> #9 0x00007ffff7af8e3d in PyEval_EvalCodeEx (co=<optimized out>, globals=<optimized out>, locals=locals at entry=0x0, args=args at entry=0x7ffff7ecee78, argcount=2, kws=kws at entry=0x9d97b8, kwcount=kwcount at entry=1, defs=defs at entry=0x7ffff7ec1688, defcount=defcount at entry=7, closure=0x0) at /usr/src/debug/Python-2.7.5/Python/ceval.c:3640 f = Frame 0xd316b0, for file /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/samba/__init__.py, line 115, in __init__ (s...

On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 07:48 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: > Anyone? Can you please post a gdb backtrace --full? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 862 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL:

Hi shorewall users, could you please help me with this fw message? May 27 11:19:17 pfw Shorewall:net2all:DROP:IN=eth0 OUT=eth2 SRC=80.178.213.211 DST=81.200.153.71 LEN=152 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=54 ID=256 DF PROTO=ESP SPI=0xdb45daed Where DST=81.200.153.71 is my VPN gateway and SRC=80.178.213.211 is my mobile with public ppp ip. The VPN tunnel is established with udp 500 allowed but if I try

E:\ruby\bin>gem update watir Updating installed gems... ERROR: While executing gem ... (Gem::RemoteFetcher::FetchError) A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly res pond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond. - connect(2)(Errno::ETIMEDOUT) E:\ruby\bin>gem update --system Updating RubyGems...

We had a running ipsec shorewall system to all of our remote offices. We added a dmz to the firewall and implemented proxy arp for that dmz. We have checked everything two or three times and cannot figure out why the vpns will no longer come up. We are using shorewall version 2.2.3 from the debian stable sarge distribution. We noticed the errata that for 2.0.0 there was a problem with proxy

Our VPN runs for 3 months very well with a minimum of traffic <100 kbit/s. Only DNS Zones and nagios passive checks were transferred. Everything seems to work. Left side is x.x.x.14 (host 1) Subnet 10.0.0.0/24 openswan 2.4.4 shorewall 2.4.2 & iptables 1.3.4 gentoo 2.6.12-r9 with policy match It´s reachable through a proxyarp entry on x.x.x.11 (host 2) which is another gentoo 2.6.12-r9