Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "kvm_s390_virtio_ccw_notifi".
Did you mean:
kvm_s390_virtio_ccw_notify
2013 Feb 26
4
[PATCH v3 0/5] kvm: Make ioeventfd usable on s390.
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 04:27:45PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> Here's the latest version of my patch series enabling ioeventfds
> on s390, again against kvm-next.
>
> Patches 1 and 2 (cleaning up initialization and exporting the virtio-ccw
> api) would make sense even independent of the ioeventfd enhancements.
>
> Patches 3-5 are concerned with adding a new type of
2013 Feb 26
4
[PATCH v3 0/5] kvm: Make ioeventfd usable on s390.
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 04:27:45PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> Here's the latest version of my patch series enabling ioeventfds
> on s390, again against kvm-next.
>
> Patches 1 and 2 (cleaning up initialization and exporting the virtio-ccw
> api) would make sense even independent of the ioeventfd enhancements.
>
> Patches 3-5 are concerned with adding a new type of
2023 Mar 23
1
[PATCH v4] virtio: add VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA feature support
On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 17:10:31 +0300, Viktor Prutyanov <viktor at daynix.com> wrote:
> According to VirtIO spec v1.2, VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA feature
> indicates that the driver passes extra data along with the queue
> notifications.
>
> In a split queue case, the extra data is 16-bit available index. In a
> packed queue case, the extra data is 1-bit wrap counter and
2023 Mar 23
1
[PATCH v4] virtio: add VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA feature support
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 10:18:56AM +0300, Viktor Prutyanov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 4:22?AM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo at linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 17:10:31 +0300, Viktor Prutyanov <viktor at daynix.com> wrote:
> > > According to VirtIO spec v1.2, VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA feature
> > > indicates that the driver passes
2023 Mar 21
0
[PATCH v3] virtio: add VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA feature support
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 04:44:10PM +0300, Viktor Prutyanov wrote:
> According to VirtIO spec v1.2, VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA feature
> indicates that the driver passes extra data along with the queue
> notifications.
>
> In a split queue case, the extra data is 16-bit available index. In a
> packed queue case, the extra data is 1-bit wrap counter and 15-bit
> available
2023 Mar 23
0
[PATCH v5] virtio: add VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA feature support
On Thu, 23 Mar 2023 11:55:51 +0300, Viktor Prutyanov <viktor at daynix.com> wrote:
> According to VirtIO spec v1.2, VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA feature
> indicates that the driver passes extra data along with the queue
> notifications.
>
> In a split queue case, the extra data is 16-bit available index. In a
> packed queue case, the extra data is 1-bit wrap counter and
2023 Mar 22
1
[PATCH v4] virtio: add VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA feature support
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 05:10:31PM +0300, Viktor Prutyanov wrote:
> According to VirtIO spec v1.2, VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA feature
> indicates that the driver passes extra data along with the queue
> notifications.
>
> In a split queue case, the extra data is 16-bit available index. In a
> packed queue case, the extra data is 1-bit wrap counter and 15-bit
> available