search for: kvm_pt_reg

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "kvm_pt_reg".

Did you mean: kvm_pt_regs
2008 Mar 28
0
[11/17][PATCH] kvm/ia64: add processor virtulization support.
Hi, Xiantao and Anthony >+void getfpreg(unsigned long regnum, struct ia64_fpreg *fpval, >+ struct kvm_pt_regs *regs) >+{ >+ /* Take floating register rotation into consideration*/ >+ if (regnum >= IA64_FIRST_ROTATING_FR) >+ regnum = IA64_FIRST_ROTATING_FR + fph_index(regs, >regnum); >+#define CASE_FIXED_FP(reg) \ >+ case (reg) : \ >+ ia64_stf_spill(fpval, reg); \ >+ b...
2008 Mar 28
0
[11/17][PATCH] kvm/ia64: add processor virtulization support.
Hi, Xiantao and Anthony >+void getfpreg(unsigned long regnum, struct ia64_fpreg *fpval, >+ struct kvm_pt_regs *regs) >+{ >+ /* Take floating register rotation into consideration*/ >+ if (regnum >= IA64_FIRST_ROTATING_FR) >+ regnum = IA64_FIRST_ROTATING_FR + fph_index(regs, >regnum); >+#define CASE_FIXED_FP(reg) \ >+ case (reg) : \ >+ ia64_stf_spill(fpval, reg); \ >+ b...
2008 Mar 31
1
[05/17][PATCH] kvm/ia64 : Add head files for kvm/ia64
...vmm_raw_spin_lock(x) > \ [snip] > + > +#define _vmm_raw_spin_unlock(x) \ Could you explain the reasoning behind these two macros? Whenever I see open coded spin lock modifications like these, I have to admit I get a bit worried. > +typedef struct kvm_vcpu VCPU; > +typedef struct kvm_pt_regs REGS; > +typedef enum { DATA_REF, NA_REF, INST_REF, RSE_REF } vhpt_ref_t; > +typedef enum { INSTRUCTION, DATA, REGISTER } miss_type; ARGH! Please see previous mail about typedefs! I suspect this is code inherited from Xen ? Xen has a lot of really nasty and pointless typedefs like these :-(...
2008 Mar 31
1
[05/17][PATCH] kvm/ia64 : Add head files for kvm/ia64
...vmm_raw_spin_lock(x) > \ [snip] > + > +#define _vmm_raw_spin_unlock(x) \ Could you explain the reasoning behind these two macros? Whenever I see open coded spin lock modifications like these, I have to admit I get a bit worried. > +typedef struct kvm_vcpu VCPU; > +typedef struct kvm_pt_regs REGS; > +typedef enum { DATA_REF, NA_REF, INST_REF, RSE_REF } vhpt_ref_t; > +typedef enum { INSTRUCTION, DATA, REGISTER } miss_type; ARGH! Please see previous mail about typedefs! I suspect this is code inherited from Xen ? Xen has a lot of really nasty and pointless typedefs like these :-(...
2008 Mar 31
4
[04/17] [PATCH] Add kvm arch-specific core code for kvm/ia64.-V8
Zhang, Xiantao wrote: >>From 62895ff991d48398a77afdbf7f2bef127e802230 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang at intel.com> > Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:49:57 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] KVM: IA64: Add kvm arch-specific core code for > kvm/ia64. > > kvm_ia64.c is created to handle kvm ia64-specific core logic. > Signed-off-by: Xiantao Zhang
2008 Mar 31
4
[04/17] [PATCH] Add kvm arch-specific core code for kvm/ia64.-V8
Zhang, Xiantao wrote: >>From 62895ff991d48398a77afdbf7f2bef127e802230 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang at intel.com> > Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:49:57 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] KVM: IA64: Add kvm arch-specific core code for > kvm/ia64. > > kvm_ia64.c is created to handle kvm ia64-specific core logic. > Signed-off-by: Xiantao Zhang