search for: kvm_mmu_slot_apply_write_access

...ory_slot.arch.gfn_track which is 16 bits, so the role bits used @@ -1130,7 +1139,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_set_mask_ptes(u64 user_mask, u64 accessed_mask, u64 acc_track_mask, u64 me_mask); void kvm_mmu_reset_context(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); -void kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access(struct kvm *kvm, +void kvm_mmu_slot_apply_write_access(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot); void kvm_mmu_zap_collapsible_sptes(struct kvm *kvm, const struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot); diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig index 92fd433c50b9..8ae822a8dc7a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x...

...ory_slot.arch.gfn_track which is 16 bits, so the role bits used @@ -1130,7 +1139,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_set_mask_ptes(u64 user_mask, u64 accessed_mask, u64 acc_track_mask, u64 me_mask); void kvm_mmu_reset_context(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); -void kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access(struct kvm *kvm, +void kvm_mmu_slot_apply_write_access(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot); void kvm_mmu_zap_collapsible_sptes(struct kvm *kvm, const struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot); diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig index 1bbec387d289..487e02de4e76 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x...

Here is change log from V3 To V4: - Fixing spelling/grammar mistakes suggested by Randy Dunlap - Changing the hypercall interface to be able to process multiple pages per one hypercall also suggested by Randy Dunlap. It turns out that this will save lots of vmexist/memory slot flushes when protecting many pages. [PATCH RFC V4 1/3] KVM: X86: Memory ROE documentation [PATCH RFC V4 2/3] KVM:

Hi, This is my first set of patches that works as I would expect, and the third revision I sent to mailing lists. Following up with my previous discussions about kernel rootkit mitigation via placing R/O protection on critical data structure, static data, privileged registers with static content. These patches present the first part where it is only possible to place these protections on memory

Hi, This is my first set of patches that works as I would expect, and the third revision I sent to mailing lists. Following up with my previous discussions about kernel rootkit mitigation via placing R/O protection on critical data structure, static data, privileged registers with static content. These patches present the first part where it is only possible to place these protections on memory