Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "kuvaiskii".
2016 Feb 09
2
Intel MPX support (instrumentation pass similar to gcc's Pointer Checker)
...e.
Regards,
Sergos
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Kostya Serebryany via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 4:59 AM, Dmitrii Kuvaiskii <
>> Dmitrii.Kuvaiskii at tu-dresden.de> wrote:
>>
>>> >> Recently I played with MPX support on Intel C/C++ Compiler (icc). This
>>> >> implementation looks *much* better, with the following example
>>> >> overheads: 1.2X on "raytr...
2016 Feb 04
2
Intel MPX support (instrumentation pass similar to gcc's Pointer Checker)
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 4:59 AM, Dmitrii Kuvaiskii <
Dmitrii.Kuvaiskii at tu-dresden.de> wrote:
> >> Recently I played with MPX support on Intel C/C++ Compiler (icc). This
> >> implementation looks *much* better, with the following example
> >> overheads: 1.2X on "raytrace", 1.25X on "bodytrack"...
2017 Feb 17
6
Intel MPX support (instrumentation pass similar to gcc's Pointer Checker)
...ions). Additionally, we've analyzed various implementation
aspects of Intel MPX and tested it on real-world applications.
We would appreciate your feedback.
Regards,
Oleksii Oleksenko
On 02/09/2016 10:27 PM, Kostya Serebryany via llvm-dev wrote:
>/On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 7:22 AM, Dmitrii Kuvaiskii < />/Dmitrii.Kuvaiskii at tu-dresden.de
<http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev>> wrote: />//>>/Thank you Sergey and Konstantin for useful suggestions. We are />>/currently bootstrapping the infrastructure for our experiments. We />>/would like...
2016 Feb 03
2
Intel MPX support (instrumentation pass similar to gcc's Pointer Checker)
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 6:27 AM, Dmitrii Kuvaiskii <
Dmitrii.Kuvaiskii at tu-dresden.de> wrote:
> I continue playing with Intel MPX and its support in modern compilers.
> All experiments were done on the Alienware (Dell) 15 R2, Ubuntu 15.10
> (linux 4.2.0), gcc version is 5.2.1, icc version 2016.1.150. The
> benchmark suite is PA...
2016 Jan 28
3
Intel MPX support (instrumentation pass similar to gcc's Pointer Checker)
.../github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/AddressSanitizerIntraObjectOverflow>,
but it's not worth the extreme complexity of the MPX-based checker.
--kcc
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:14 AM, David Chisnall via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On 28 Jan 2016, at 17:03, Dmitrii Kuvaiskii via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >
> > Interestingly, my
> > preliminary experiments indicate that adding MPX bounds checking via
> > Pointer Checker in gcc is usually slower than using software-only
> > AddressSanitizer.
>
> This co...
2016 Sep 02
2
ScalarEvolution pass and interprocedural analysis
...compilation time for real-world (think memcached, nginx) programs?
Any feedback/hints/papers are welcome, thanks in advance. Also, any
good manual on how ScalarEvolution can be used in LLVM would be great
(currently I'm looking into how other LLVM passes use it).
--
Yours sincerely,
Dmitrii Kuvaiskii
2016 Jan 28
2
Intel MPX support (instrumentation pass similar to gcc's Pointer Checker)
...ienware 15 R2 with the
following CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6820HK. Interestingly, my
preliminary experiments indicate that adding MPX bounds checking via
Pointer Checker in gcc is usually slower than using software-only
AddressSanitizer.
Thanks for the other pointers!
--
Yours sincerely,
Dmitrii Kuvaiskii
2016 Jan 28
2
Intel MPX support (instrumentation pass similar to gcc's Pointer Checker)
...ot currently
involved in MPX. But he pointed to the SoftBoundCETS prototype at
https://github.com/santoshn/softboundcets-34 . Therefore, I was
thinking about adapting SoftBound to MPX, as a drop-in replacement for
gcc's PointerChecker. Could anyone comment on this?
--
Yours sincerely,
Dmitrii Kuvaiskii