search for: kuestler

There doesn't appear to be an rpm target in the Makefile. My spec file is derived from the included spec file however it did not honour the DESTDIR, hence the changes. On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 22:43 -0700, Reid Spencer wrote: > Hi David, > > On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 15:56 +1200, David Kuestler wrote: > > I have built llvm as a Fedora Core 5 package : > > http://www.demi.com.au/downloads/i386/llvm/ > > comments welcome. > > I'm just curious. Did you use the "make rpm" target that is provided in > the makefile? > > Any issues with it? >...

The rpm target was added after 1.8 was released so I guess you're not using CVS version. I also made several changes to the spec file which you might be interested in. The current version is attached. Reid. On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 21:02 +1200, David Kuestler wrote: > There doesn't appear to be an rpm target in the Makefile. > My spec file is derived from the included spec file however it did not > honour the DESTDIR, hence the changes. > > On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 22:43 -0700, Reid Spencer wrote: > > Hi David, > > > &gt...

I have built llvm as a Fedora Core 5 package : http://www.demi.com.au/downloads/i386/llvm/ comments welcome.

Hi David, On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 15:56 +1200, David Kuestler wrote: > I have built llvm as a Fedora Core 5 package : > http://www.demi.com.au/downloads/i386/llvm/ > comments welcome. I'm just curious. Did you use the "make rpm" target that is provided in the makefile? Any issues with it? Reid.

...ote: > The rpm target was added after 1.8 was released so I guess you're not > using CVS version. I also made several changes to the spec file which > you might be interested in. The current version is attached. > > Reid. > > > On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 21:02 +1200, David Kuestler wrote: >> There doesn't appear to be an rpm target in the Makefile. >> My spec file is derived from the included spec file however it did not >> honour the DESTDIR, hence the changes. >> >> On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 22:43 -0700, Reid Spencer wrote: >>> Hi Davi...