search for: kuchta

...d. I wouldn’t be surprised if this is already fixed / changed in some newer version of LLVM and I agree I should upgrade :) Thank you very much for help, Best regards Tomek On 03/06/2014 17:15, "Philip Reames" <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: > >On 06/03/2014 02:50 AM, Kuchta, Tomasz wrote: >> Hi Philip, >> >> I would like to ask a follow-up question about code generation. >> Do you know if is expected that if we take the same bit code modules and >> link them together in the same order (programatically), but on different >> machines...

...odules and link them together in the same order (programatically), but on different machines (assuming the same version of LLVM and roughly the same OS), the output may differ with respect to order of function definitions inside module? Thank you very much in advance for help, Best regards Tomasz Kuchta On 29/05/2014 22:22, "Kuchta, Tomasz" <t.kuchta12 at imperial.ac.uk> wrote: >Hi Philip, > >Thank you very much for the reply. I need to add one important detail - >currently I¹m working on an outdated version of >LLVM, so I will need to first make sure that it also...

Hi Tim, Thank you very much for quick response. What happens in my case is that mixing calls to getOrInsertFunction with linking another bit code module to the current module seems to be sometimes producing different outputs. Difference might be with the ordering of functions in the file (I¹m looking at LLVM IR representation), with numbers used for constant variables, numbers used in the ³dbg²

On 05/29/2014 11:06 AM, Tim Northover wrote: > Hi Tomek, > >> I’ve got a question about Module::getOrInsertFunction(). >> I got an impression that it is not deterministic where exactly in the bit >> code module the new function will be inserted. > Looking at the code (not exhaustively), it seems a new function will > always be added to the end of a module. > >

Hi All, I’ve got a question about Module::getOrInsertFunction(). I got an impression that it is not deterministic where exactly in the bit code module the new function will be inserted. Is there a way to make it deterministic by explicitly specifying some offset at which the function should be inserted? Please correct me if I’m wrong. Thank you very much in advance for help, Best regards, Tomek