search for: kromis

Resend On Oct 14, 2008, at 5:40 AM, Mark Kromis wrote: > Greetings, > > I have a compiler error that I have not been able to get through. I > usually depend upon pre-built binaries but there was none available > for the pre-release. I also try scanning the web site and mail list > but was unable to find an answer. I was...

...or==(uint64_t, const llvm::APInt&) make[1]: *** [/c/Users/Greybird/Desktop/llvm/llvm-2.4/lib/VMCore/ Release/BasicBl ock.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/c/Users/Greybird/Desktop/llvm/llvm-2.4/ lib/VMCore' make: *** [all] Error 1 Any help will be greatly appreciated. Regards Mark Kromis

...VM currently cannot be built this way. The errors you've posted so far are just the beginning; there are many more errors after them. Some widely-used idioms within LLVM violate standard concept requirements; fixing these will require some broad changes. Dan On Oct 14, 2008, at 3:25 PM, Mark Kromis wrote: > > Resend > > > On Oct 14, 2008, at 5:40 AM, Mark Kromis wrote: > >> Greetings, >> >> I have a compiler error that I have not been able to get through. I >> usually depend upon pre-built binaries but there was none available >> for the pre-re...

On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Mark Kromis <greybird at mac.com> wrote: > > On Dec 27, 2008, at 7:41 PM, Misha Brukman wrote: > > 2008/12/27 Mark Kromis <greybird at mac.com> > >> Just a curiosity question, why push for gtest vs Boost Test or >> a different test suite? >> I normally use Boost, a...

2008/12/27 Mark Kromis <greybird at mac.com> > Is this something your planning as putting in the tree, >> thus require pulling in changes from google (license allowing), or does user >> need to have the libraries/headers pre-installed? >> > > Including it in the tree is the most reasonab...

2008/12/27 Mark Kromis <greybird at mac.com> > Just a curiosity question, why push for gtest vs Boost Test or > a different test suite? > I normally use Boost, and their test suite, so I'm more familiar with that. > So I was wondering is one better then the other, or is it just that someone > ma...

On Dec 27, 2008, at 11:01 PM, Misha Brukman wrote: > 2008/12/27 Mark Kromis <greybird at mac.com> >> Is this something your planning as putting in the tree, thus >> require pulling in changes from google (license allowing), or does >> user need to have the libraries/headers pre-installed? >> >> Including it in the tree is the most re...

On Dec 27, 2008, at 7:41 PM, Misha Brukman wrote: > 2008/12/27 Mark Kromis <greybird at mac.com> > Just a curiosity question, why push for gtest vs Boost Test or a > different test suite? > I normally use Boost, and their test suite, so I'm more familiar > with that. So I was wondering is one better then the other, or is it > just that someo...

...; > Keir > > Just briefly looked at the googlemock site and it sys about needed tr1 library. Third paragraph in System Requirements. It just struck me as amusing that visual c++ people need boost then. I'll look into this more. Thank you for your kind explanations. Regards Mark Kromis -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20081227/643eb4f5/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature...

Mark Kromis wrote: > Resend > > > On Oct 14, 2008, at 5:40 AM, Mark Kromis wrote: > > >> Greetings, >> >> I have a compiler error that I have not been able to get through. I >> usually depend upon pre-built binaries but there was none available >> for the...

Oscar, I be willing to donate some machine time to you. How about a 2 x 3GHz Dual Core Intel Xeon with 8GB? The question is how to get past the NAT. Email me privately if interested. Regards Mark Kromis On Nov 11, 2008, at 12:12 AM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Reports arrived indicating that the LLVM cmake-based build system is > lacking some OS X specific work, which seems to be the OS of choice > for > quite a few LLVM developers. I know there are sites out there that > offer &gt...

Just a curiosity question, why push for gtest vs Boost Test or a different test suite? I normally use Boost, and their test suite, so I'm more familiar with that. So I was wondering is one better then the other, or is it just that someone makes a patch for it? Regards Mark Kromis On Dec 27, 2008, at 12:26 AM, Keir Mierle wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 8:06 PM, Misha Brukman <brukman at gmail.com> > wrote: > On Dec 22, 7:34 pm, Talin <viri... at gmail.com> wrote: > > (Forwarding this to llvm-dev) > > > > This patch adds...

Reports arrived indicating that the LLVM cmake-based build system is lacking some OS X specific work, which seems to be the OS of choice for quite a few LLVM developers. I know there are sites out there that offer Linux shell accounts. Is there something similar for OS X, where building LLVM would be possible? A google search turned no solid results. Or would someone donate ssh access and approx.

On Oct 14, 2008, at 11:21 PM, Kenneth Boyd wrote: > Mark Kromis wrote: >> Resend >> >> >> On Oct 14, 2008, at 5:40 AM, Mark Kromis wrote: >> >> >>> Greetings, >>> >>> I have a compiler error that I have not been able to get through. I >>> usually depend upon pre-built binaries but there was...

On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 8:06 PM, Misha Brukman <brukman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 22, 7:34 pm, Talin <viri... at gmail.com> wrote: > > (Forwarding this to llvm-dev) > > > > This patch adds a unit test framework to LLVM, along with a sample unit > test > > for DenseMap. I don't expect this patch to be accepted as-is, this is > mainly > > a

2008/12/27 Mark Kromis <greybird at mac.com> > So are you planning on maintaining whatever test system, or just have them > as a pre-requisite. For example are you going to have the gtest > incorporated, or have them install it separately first? I was under the > impression that the user would have to...

Mark Kromis wrote: > On Dec 27, 2008, at 7:41 PM, Misha Brukman wrote: >> 2008/12/27 Mark Kromis <greybird at mac.com> >> Just a curiosity question, why push for gtest vs Boost Test or a >> different test suite? >> I normally use Boost, and their test suite, so I'm more fa...