search for: krohn

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "krohn".

Did you mean: kohn
2008 Jun 13
11
Have 2 DomU share a same Logical Volume
Hi xeners, I am trying to have 2 DomU share a single Logical Volume. I need that at least one of the DomU has read-write access to the LV. I have tried, but up to now, it only works if both DomU have read-only writes to the LV. That''s a problem for me, because I wanted to set up Nginx on a DomU, and Rails on another one, and have Nginx get read access to an LV that would hold the public
2008 Jun 07
56
Unable to create more than 1 VM
Hi, I have already set up a VM that can access the network using the NAT mode. The problem I have is that I''d like to create another VM that also has access to the network. The problem I get is that when a VM is started, the other one will refuse to start. Actually it starts, but when I want to "xm console" into it I get the following error message: "xenconsole: Could not
2008 Sep 01
10
Unable to xm console in a running domU
Hi list, I am running a virtualized server. Dom0 uses Xen 3.2.1 with Debian Etch and a custom kernel 2.6.21 created by my webhosting company. I install my domU using debootstrap for a Debian Etch with 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64 kernel. Everything works well except the fact that once the VM is started I cannot "xm console" into it. It only works while it is booting and while it is shutting
2011 Apr 12
0
No subject
...odulation) over VoIP. Try again, the fact that you succeeded twice was pure luck, and as far as I understand that didn't even work out. Switch back to TDM. Your dial up modems want that magic thing called timing and no jitter that only TDM will give you. On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Aaron Krohn <akrohn at ewebforce.net> wrote: > We have an Ascend Max router that has a PRI plugged into it, providing ou= r > current dialup users with web access. The PRI is no longer cost effective= , > so I've been tasked with converting it to something cheaper. > > We added a DID t...
2015 May 24
2
CentOS-Base.repo baseurl commented out
Am 24.05.2015 um 16:11 schrieb Johnny Hughes: > On 05/24/2015 07:48 AM, Tim Semeijn wrote: >> Weird, as all CentOS machines under my control are suddenly giving the >> baseurl of Base repo not found error since this morning. Could be that >> mirrorlist is leading but all other options I found online to debug >> the error message seem to indicate that (un)commenting
2015 May 24
2
CentOS-Base.repo baseurl commented out
...nection: keep-alive > Content-Length: 0 > > ~ $ > > Thanks for looking into it! > > (Also, I wonder why the results don't contain > centos.mirrors.ovh.net which should be closest - but that's another > question for another time.) > > Best regards, Felix Krohn - -- Tim Semeijn Babylon Network pgp 0x5B8A4DDF -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVYeYkAAoJEIZioqpbik3fEp8P/iZSjRRA3C355W5TW4S7yYXB MDim9D6CQDHPjVtE905X7uXl17XO5+mYGsnxzCUtJmzATkOxTSoIC5KXomq106L5 ms3vpLwGeyUPlNGaQ3QExc0h/VZNnr01KbTbL8H2eOPK4xit+dQ6I5V8K8t4Y3PL hTPfl...
2011 Sep 08
1
Trying to understand SELinux MSG
Hello, I received the below SELinux message today and I am trying to figure out what caused it. I see what it says under Allow Access but I am not sure this is what I really want to do without know why it happened in the first place. What should I be looking at to understand what or why this has happened? Any help I would be most grateful for. Here is the output form SELinux SUMMARY: