search for: kreijackatinwind

I''ve filed this bug under util-linux, because I think wipefs isn''t deleting all btrfs metadata it could. But ultimately it appears to be a btrfs bug because nothing else sees the stale volume. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889888#c15 btrfs-progs-0.20.rc1.20121017git92d9eec-1.fc18.x86_64 e2fs-progs-1.42.5-1.fc18.x86_64 kernel 3.7.1-2 Brand new 80GB virtual disk,

...+ vfs->mnt_root->d_name.name[0] != ''/''){ + seq_puts(seq, ",subvol="); + seq_puts(seq, vfs->mnt_root->d_name.name); + } + spin_unlock(&vfs->mnt_root->d_lock); return 0; } -- gpg key@ keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (ghigo) <kreijackATinwind.it> Key fingerprint = 4769 7E51 5293 D36C 814E C054 BF04 F161 3DC5 0512

I create a new btrfs filesystem and then add a new device and delete the original device. When I run ''btrfs filesystem show'', the total device is two and there is an error that some devices are missing. I also tried to resize the filesystem but didn''t work. Resizing without device id have an error that there is no such device. When the device id is explicitly pass, an

Hi All, the following patches implement the recursively snapshotting and deleting of a subvolume. To snapshot recursively you must pass the -R switch: # btrfs subvolume create sub1 Create subvolume ''./sub1'' # btrfs subvolume create sub1/sub2 Create subvolume ''sub1/sub2'' # btrfs subvolume snapshot -R sub1 sub1-snap Create a snapshot of

Did something break.. ? we are not reporting raid type after balance. ----------- # btrfs fi df /btrfs Data, RAID0: total=2.00GB, used=2.03MB Data: total=8.00MB, used=0.00 System, RAID0: total=16.00MB, used=4.00KB System: total=4.00MB, used=0.00 Metadata, RAID0: total=2.00GB, used=216.00KB Metadata: total=8.00MB, used=4.00KB # btrfs bal /btrfs Done, had to relocate 5 out of 5 chunks # btrfs fi

Thanks for the quick reply! But I still have problems with btrfsctl: > stat /dev/btrfs-control File: `/dev/btrfs-control'' Size: 0 Blocks: 0 IO Block: 4096 block special file Device: ch/12d Inode: 659848 Links: 1 Device type: a,3e Access: (0644/brw-r--r--) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root) Access: 2010-01-09 11:31:15.757979602 +0100

...adata,RAID1: Size:460.94MB, Used:24.00KB /dev/vdb 460.94MB /dev/vdd 460.94MB Metadata,Single: Size:8.00MB, Used:0.00 /dev/vdb 8.00MB Unused: /dev/vdb 2.23GB /dev/vdc 2.69GB /dev/vdd 2.24GB - -- gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (kreijackATinwind.it> Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQiZFRAAoJEA7amzeLguC1v6QQAIk22PRdfXJJZC3Jq0zugQrg e+4N2FZXDrLtYaV1+skXpLQXSQg60I...

Hi I''ve made some updates on the wiki and I''d like a technical review for correctness. This particular topic is already confusing - some unnecessary sarcasm made it even more so: https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/FAQ#Why_does_df_show_incorrect_free_space_for_my_RAID_volume.3F Due to the terms "used" and "allocated" in the wiki, viric in #btrfs made

Hi, Let me know if this is the wrong place to ask... I''m using Fedora 12 x86_64, mostly with the newer 21.6.32 kernel, and have a single btrfs filesystem within a 120Gb partition. I''d like to extend the space btrfs can use. One option is presumably add a new device to btrfs, but I was hoping to simple resize the existing partition to say 160Gb. With ext4 I might do

...ested these scripts which an ubuntu 10.4 system. I don''t know the changes which may be required to work for other distributions (like fedora), but I am very interested in knowing those. Comments are welcome. BR Goffredo -- gpg key@ keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (ghigo) <kreijackATinwind.it> Key fingerprint = 4769 7E51 5293 D36C 814E C054 BF04 F161 3DC5 0512 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Hi Anthony, I think that for you may be interested to read this thread http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-btrfs/2009/11/20/6588643/thread and to read a my blog about this argument http://kreijack.blogspot.com/2010/01/linux-btrfs-example-of-layout.html Regards Goffredo >----Messaggio originale---- >Da: anthony@extof.me >Data: 19/05/2010 8.50 >A:

Currently, the following commands succeed. # cat /proc/swaps Filename Type Size Used Priority /dev/sda3 partition 8388604 0 -1 /dev/sdc8 partition 9765884 0 -2 # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdc8 WARNING! - Btrfs v0.20-rc1-165-g82ac345 IS EXPERIMENTAL WARNING! - see

Hallo, linux-btrfs, please delete the option "-L" (for labelling) in "mkfs.btrfs", in some configurations it doesn''t work as expected. My usual way: mkfs.btrfs -d raid0 -m raid1 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd ... One call for some devices. Wenn I add the option "-L mylabel" then each device gets the same label, and therefore some other programs

From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> (This patch is for the review/test not yet for the integration). Here is an implementation of the feature to add label to the subvolume and snapshots. Which would help sysadmin to better manager the subvol and snapshots. This can be done in two ways, one - using attr which is user land only changes but drawback is able to change the label