search for: kpte

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30 matches for "kpte".

Did you mean: _pte
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 5/9] 00mm6 kpte flush.patch
...ll try to access this pte + * without first remap it. Keeping stale mappings around is a bad idea + * also, in case the page changes cacheability attributes or becomes + * a protected page in a hypervisor. */ - pte_clear(&init_mm, vaddr, kmap_pte-idx); - __flush_tlb_one(vaddr); -#endif + kpte_clear_flush(kmap_pte-idx, vaddr); dec_preempt_count(); preempt_check_resched(); @@ -94,7 +91,6 @@ void *kmap_atomic_pfn(unsigned long pfn, idx = type + KM_TYPE_NR*smp_processor_id(); vaddr = __fix_to_virt(FIX_KMAP_BEGIN + idx); set_pte(kmap_pte-idx, pfn_pte(pfn, kmap_prot)); - __flush_t...
2008 Jan 18
6
[PATCH 0/10] Tree fixes for PARAVIRT
Hi, This small series provides some more fixes towards the goal to have the PARAVIRT selectable for x86_64. After that, just some more small steps are needed. The first fix is not even specific for PARAVIRT, and it's actually preventing the whole tree from booting.
2008 Jan 18
6
[PATCH 0/10] Tree fixes for PARAVIRT
Hi, This small series provides some more fixes towards the goal to have the PARAVIRT selectable for x86_64. After that, just some more small steps are needed. The first fix is not even specific for PARAVIRT, and it's actually preventing the whole tree from booting.
2007 Apr 18
1
paravirt patches in -mm
Guys, could you please confirm that these patches from -mm: paravirt-remove-read-hazard-from-cow.patch paravirt-pte-clear-not-present.patch paravirt-lazy-mmu-mode-hooks.patch paravirt-combine-flush-accessed-dirty.patch paravirt-kpte-flush.patch paravirt-optimize-ptep-establish-for-pae.patch paravirt-remove-set-pte-atomic.patch paravirt-pae-compile-fix.patch paravirt-update-pte-hook.patch are suitable for mainline inclusion? Thanks.
2007 Apr 18
1
paravirt patches in -mm
Guys, could you please confirm that these patches from -mm: paravirt-remove-read-hazard-from-cow.patch paravirt-pte-clear-not-present.patch paravirt-lazy-mmu-mode-hooks.patch paravirt-combine-flush-accessed-dirty.patch paravirt-kpte-flush.patch paravirt-optimize-ptep-establish-for-pae.patch paravirt-remove-set-pte-atomic.patch paravirt-pae-compile-fix.patch paravirt-update-pte-hook.patch are suitable for mainline inclusion? Thanks.
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH 1/5] Add pagetable allocation notifiers
...t_pte(&pbase[i], pfn_pte(addr >> PAGE_SHIFT, + set_pte(&pbase[i], pfn_pte(addr >> PAGE_SHIFT, addr == address ? prot : PAGE_KERNEL)); } return base; @@ -146,6 +147,7 @@ __change_page_attr(struct page *page, pg BUG_ON(!page_count(kpte_page)); if (cpu_has_pse && (page_count(kpte_page) == 1)) { + ClearPagePTE(virt_to_page(kpte)); list_add(&kpte_page->lru, &df_list); revert_page(kpte_page, address); } Index: linux-2.6.13/arch/i386/mm/pgtable.c ====================================================...
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH 1/5] Add pagetable allocation notifiers
...t_pte(&pbase[i], pfn_pte(addr >> PAGE_SHIFT, + set_pte(&pbase[i], pfn_pte(addr >> PAGE_SHIFT, addr == address ? prot : PAGE_KERNEL)); } return base; @@ -146,6 +147,7 @@ __change_page_attr(struct page *page, pg BUG_ON(!page_count(kpte_page)); if (cpu_has_pse && (page_count(kpte_page) == 1)) { + ClearPagePTE(virt_to_page(kpte)); list_add(&kpte_page->lru, &df_list); revert_page(kpte_page, address); } Index: linux-2.6.13/arch/i386/mm/pgtable.c ====================================================...
2006 Mar 14
12
[RFC] VMI for Xen?
I''m sure everyone has seen the drop of VMI patches for Linux at this point, but just in case, the link is included below. I''ve read this version of the VMI spec and have made my way through most of the patches. While I wasn''t really that impressed with the first spec wrt Xen, the second version seems to be much more palatable. Specifically, the code inlining and
2007 Apr 18
2
pgd_alloc and [cd]tors
Is there any real use in having a ctor/dtor for the pgd cache? Given that all pgd allocation happens via pgd_alloc/pgd_free, why not just fold the [cd]tor in? I'm asking because Xen wants pgd[3] to be unshared in the PAE case, and it looks to me like the easiest way to handle that is by making pgd_alloc/free pv-ops and doing the appropriate thing in the Xen code. Would need to sort out the
2007 Apr 18
2
pgd_alloc and [cd]tors
Is there any real use in having a ctor/dtor for the pgd cache? Given that all pgd allocation happens via pgd_alloc/pgd_free, why not just fold the [cd]tor in? I'm asking because Xen wants pgd[3] to be unshared in the PAE case, and it looks to me like the easiest way to handle that is by making pgd_alloc/free pv-ops and doing the appropriate thing in the Xen code. Would need to sort out the
2007 Apr 18
17
[patch 00/17] paravirt_ops updates
Hi Andi, This series of patches updates paravirt_ops in various ways. Some of the changes are plain cleanups and improvements, and some add some interfaces necessary for Xen. The brief overview: add-MAINTAINERS.patch - obvious remove-CONFIG_DEBUG_PARAVIRT.patch - no longer needed paravirt-nop.patch - mark nop operations consistently paravirt-pte-accessors.patch - operations to pack/unpack
2007 Apr 18
17
[patch 00/17] paravirt_ops updates
Hi Andi, This series of patches updates paravirt_ops in various ways. Some of the changes are plain cleanups and improvements, and some add some interfaces necessary for Xen. The brief overview: add-MAINTAINERS.patch - obvious remove-CONFIG_DEBUG_PARAVIRT.patch - no longer needed paravirt-nop.patch - mark nop operations consistently paravirt-pte-accessors.patch - operations to pack/unpack
2006 Feb 24
2
r56 - trunk/debian
...--- pristine-linux-2.6.12/arch/i386/mm/pageattr.c 2005-06-17 21:48:29.000000000 +0200 -+++ linux-2.6.12-xen/arch/i386/mm/pageattr.c 2006-02-17 00:45:18.266516414 +0100 ++++ linux-2.6.12-xen/arch/i386/mm/pageattr.c 2006-02-25 00:12:33.823986410 +0100 @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static void set_pmd_pte(pte_t *kpte, uns unsigned long flags; @@ -1965,7 +1965,7 @@ spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags); diff -Nurp pristine-linux-2.6.12/arch/i386/mm/pgtable.c linux-2.6.12-xen/arch/i386/mm/pgtable.c --- pristine-linux-2.6.12/arch/i386/mm/pgtable.c 2005-06-17 21:48:29.000000000 +0200 -+++ linux-2.6.12-...
2007 Apr 18
23
[patch 00/20] paravirt_ops updates
Hi Andi, Here's a repost of the paravirt_ops update series I posted the other day. Since then, I found a few potential bugs with patching clobbering, cleaned up and documented paravirt.h and the patching machinery. Overview: add-MAINTAINERS.patch obvious remove-CONFIG_DEBUG_PARAVIRT.patch No longer meaningful or needed. paravirt-nop.patch Clean up nop paravirt_ops functions, mainly to
2007 Apr 18
23
[patch 00/20] paravirt_ops updates
Hi Andi, Here's a repost of the paravirt_ops update series I posted the other day. Since then, I found a few potential bugs with patching clobbering, cleaned up and documented paravirt.h and the patching machinery. Overview: add-MAINTAINERS.patch obvious remove-CONFIG_DEBUG_PARAVIRT.patch No longer meaningful or needed. paravirt-nop.patch Clean up nop paravirt_ops functions, mainly to
2007 Apr 18
20
[patch 00/20] XEN-paravirt: Xen guest implementation for paravirt_ops interface
This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest in terms of the paravirt-ops interface. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP only (most code is SMP-safe, but there's no way to create a new vcpu) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes * xen console * virtual block
2007 Apr 18
20
[patch 00/20] XEN-paravirt: Xen guest implementation for paravirt_ops interface
This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest in terms of the paravirt-ops interface. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP only (most code is SMP-safe, but there's no way to create a new vcpu) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes * xen console * virtual block
2007 Apr 18
20
[patch 00/20] XEN-paravirt: Xen guest implementation for paravirt_ops interface
This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest in terms of the paravirt-ops interface. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP only (most code is SMP-safe, but there's no way to create a new vcpu) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes * xen console * virtual block
2007 Apr 18
24
[patch 00/24] Xen-paravirt_ops: Xen guest implementation for paravirt_ops interface
Hi Andi, This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest as a paravirt_ops backend. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP only (most code is SMP-safe, but there's no way to create a new vcpu) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes * xen hvc console (console=hvc0) *
2007 Apr 18
24
[patch 00/24] Xen-paravirt_ops: Xen guest implementation for paravirt_ops interface
Hi Andi, This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest as a paravirt_ops backend. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP only (most code is SMP-safe, but there's no way to create a new vcpu) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes * xen hvc console (console=hvc0) *