search for: kps

I updated an i386 system to b39 yesterday, and noticed this when running iostat: r/s w/s kr/s kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b device 0.0 0.5 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0 0 c0t0d0 0.0 0.5 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0 0 c0t1d0 0.0 65.1 0.0 119640001.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0 2 c0t2d0 0.0 65.1 0.0 119640090.2 0.0

Dear R-Help, I am trying to perform forward selection on the following coxph model: >my.bpfs <- Surv(bcox$pfsdays, bcox$pfscensor) > b.cox <- coxph(my.bpfs ~ Cbase + Abase + Cbave + CbSD + KPS + gender + as.factor(eor) + Age)>stepAIC(b.cox, scope=list(upper =~ Cbase + Abase + Cbave + CbSD + KPS + gender + as.factor(eor) + Age, lower=~1), direction= c("forward")) However the following code returns the full model. How do I write the code so that forward selection is performed...

Hi Farhan, It is interesting that GPRS is 9.6 kps, as per GPRS standard it should be 115kps ? if it is 9.6kps is true then I would use speex codec on GPRS for my project, since in some country they charge GPRS on flat rate rather than expensive airtime. Thanks for your work ! Regards Danny -----Original Message----- From: speex-dev-bounces...

Hi all, I have exchanged my Dell R610 in favor of a Sun Fire 4170 M2 which has 32 GB RAM installed. I am running Sol11Expr on this host and I use it to primarily serve Netatalk AFP shares. From day one, I have noticed that the amount of free RAM decereased and along with that decrease the overall performance of ZFS decreased as well. Now, since I am still quite a Solaris newbie, I seem to

..., and when manually prefixing with 0, that extra 0 is also entered in the TRACKNUMBER-field. How about an option to prefix filename-tracknumbers only for single-digit tracks ? Fx. %N in stead of %n. (*) At silent areas in a song (extracted digitally with cdparanoia) the bitrate holds around 200 kps (-b 192).. That seems like a waste of bits to me (but i'm not an expert on this, so i'll leave that decision to you :) [ogg123] (*) When done playing an ogg (or list of oggs), ogg123 always exits with an segmentation fault. I tested this with both oss and null devices, with and without...

...with error-code 1. Sometimes early, sometimes late in progress. This is what I am using in a shell script: rsync --omit-dir-times --size-only -avzAX \ --bwlimit=$KILOBYTES_PER_SECOND --devices --specials --numeric-ids \ --delete $BACULA_BACKUP_DIR $MOUNT_DIR/$SYNC_DIR The bandwidth limit is 2500 kps. Without the limit it was working so far since my boss told me to stop using it this way because he was afraid of rsync taking all the network resources. BTW, both NAS-Devices are mounted aus type cifs. My rsync version is rsync version 3.0.7 protocol version 30 Is this a known issue or does th...

I have looked at the codec's available but I don't know how get the highest quality recorded message. If a user calls in over the normal telephone network is this limited to the carriers codec or the codec at the asterisk side? Would I get a higher quality result using VoIP rather than the normal network? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Fats.

Hi Farhan, My mistake, it is 9.6kps because is on gsm ! Regards, Danny -----Original Message----- From: speex-dev-bounces@xiph.org [mailto:speex-dev-bounces@xiph.org] On Behalf Of Danny Chan Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 2:08 AM To: Ashhar Farhan; speex Subject: RE: [Speex-dev] jitter buffer Hi Farhan, It is interesting that...

...cs, Inc. WEB http://xtronics.com 3209 West 9th Street Ph (785) 841-3089 Lawrence, KS 66049 FAX (785) 841-0434 Beware of 'do-good-ers': the greatest evil is always done in the name of 'doing good'. Kps --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

...rl at xtronics.com WEB https://secure.transtronics.com 3209 West 9th Street Ph (785) 841-3089 Lawrence, KS 66049 FAX (785) 841-3089 The government can print money - they can't print wealth. kps --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Please excuse if this is a repeat; I initially tried to send it from a different account, and it's been held up for a couple of days awaiting moderation.] 1) What's the absolute minimum required (hardware-wise) in order to get one in-bound POTS line into Asterisk, and then have IP phones "inside?" [In other words, I obviously need a NIC -- but what would be the

On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "David Majnemer" <david.majnemer at gmail.com> > > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > > Cc: "Renato Golin" <renato.golin at linaro.org>, "LLVM" < > llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > > Sent:

This is sort of working -- but I can't get it to do a 4k output. Not sure how the monitor resolution is detected - This monitor is supposed to do 3480x1200 60hz 4:4:4 But the info I get from hwinfo is different. How does nouveau get this information? If it is from an ID - with a list - the list is probably is wrong. # hwinfo --monitor 95: None 00.1: 10002 LCD Monitor [Created at

...-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Karl Schmidt EMail karl at lrak.net 3209 West 9th Street Ph (785) 841-3089 Lawrence, KS 66049 Critical mass; it only takes three people to have a party in a closet. -kps --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ah, I thought you missed in my earlier reply the part about a bug with debug printouts in 2.8.0 (fixed on master since), did not comment on that when you replied with quoting... So, for now options are to bump debugging to 3+ or to build your own in one of many ways possible :\ On Wed, Jul 5, 2023, 06:23 Karl Schmidt <karl at lrak.net> wrote: > On 7/4/23 10:01PM, Jim Klimov wrote: >

Currently the blacklist is maintained by hand in kprobes.c which is separated from the function definition and is hard to catch up the kernel update. To solve this issue, I've tried to implement new NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macro for making kprobe blacklist at build time. Since the NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macros can be placed right after the function is defined, it is easy to maintain. This series

Currently the blacklist is maintained by hand in kprobes.c which is separated from the function definition and is hard to catch up the kernel update. To solve this issue, I've tried to implement new NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macro for making kprobe blacklist at build time. Since the NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macros can be placed right after the function is defined, it is easy to maintain. This series

Hi, Here is the version 3 of NOKPORBE_SYMBOL series. Currently the blacklist is maintained by hand in kprobes.c which is separated from the function definition and is hard to catch up the kernel update. To solve this issue, I've introduced NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macro for making kprobe blacklist at build time. Since the NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macros can be placed right after the function is defined

Hi, Here is the version 3 of NOKPORBE_SYMBOL series. Currently the blacklist is maintained by hand in kprobes.c which is separated from the function definition and is hard to catch up the kernel update. To solve this issue, I've introduced NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macro for making kprobe blacklist at build time. Since the NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macros can be placed right after the function is defined

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking