search for: kotthoff

...FILE $PROGRAM $OPTIONS But this seems not to create a pidfile at all. It checks only if a pidile exist already. This is executed at the end # $cgroup $nice runuser -s /bin/bash $user -c "$corelimit >/dev/null 2>&1 ; $*" Am I missed something? Thanks, Sebastian -- Sebastian Kotthoff Rechenzentrum Universit?t Mannheim B6, 23-29; Building B; Room 1.10 68159 Mannheim Tel: +49 621 181 2516 Fax: +49 621 181 2682

...pidfile at all. It checks only if > a pidile exist already. > This is executed at the end > # $cgroup $nice runuser -s /bin/bash $user -c "$corelimit >/dev/null 2>&1 ; $*" > > Am I missed something? > > Thanks, > > Sebastian > -- > Sebastian Kotthoff > Rechenzentrum > Universit?t Mannheim > B6, 23-29; Building B; Room 1.10 > 68159 Mannheim > > Tel: +49 621 181 2516 > Fax: +49 621 181 2682 > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/...

...ification, regression, forecasting, clustering, etc.. There are 83 classifiers alone so even when loading and unloading across learner types we can still hit the MAX_NUM_DLLS error, meaning we'll have to break them down further (or maybe we can be clever with gcDLLs()?). I'm CC'ing Lars Kotthoff and Bernd Bischl to make sure I am representing the issue well. Regards, Steve Bronder Website: stevebronder.com Phone: 412-719-1282 Email: sbronder at stevebronder.com On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Henrik Bengtsson < henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com> wrote: > On reason for hitting th...

...g, clustering, etc.. There are 83 classifiers alone | > so even when loading and unloading across learner types we can still hit | > the MAX_NUM_DLLS error, meaning we'll have to break them down further (or | > maybe we can be clever with gcDLLs()?). I'm CC'ing Lars Kotthoff and Bernd | > Bischl to make sure I am representing the issue well. | | This came up *here* in May 2015 | and then May 2016 ... did you not find it when googling. | | Hint: Use | site:stat.ethz.ch MAX_NUM_DLLS | as search string in Google, so it will basically only search the | R...

skotthof wrote: > > OK, I figured out, I have to install > redhat-lsb package for start-stop-daemon > "Implementation of Linux Standard Base specification" > > Sebastian > On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 11:06:59AM +0200, skotthof wrote: >> Hi, >> >> we started using centos7 to run kvm+libvirt. >> For novnc to virtual machines I like to start >>

...casting, clustering, etc.. There are 83 classifiers alone > so even when loading and unloading across learner types we can still hit > the MAX_NUM_DLLS error, meaning we'll have to break them down further (or > maybe we can be clever with gcDLLs()?). I'm CC'ing Lars Kotthoff and Bernd > Bischl to make sure I am representing the issue well. This came up *here* in May 2015 and then May 2016 ... did you not find it when googling. Hint: Use site:stat.ethz.ch MAX_NUM_DLLS as search string in Google, so it will basically only search the R mailing list arch...

...etc.. There are 83 classifiers alone > | > so even when loading and unloading across learner types we can still hit > | > the MAX_NUM_DLLS error, meaning we'll have to break them down further (or > | > maybe we can be clever with gcDLLs()?). I'm CC'ing Lars Kotthoff and Bernd > | > Bischl to make sure I am representing the issue well. > | > | This came up *here* in May 2015 > | and then May 2016 ... did you not find it when googling. > | > | Hint: Use > | site:stat.ethz.ch MAX_NUM_DLLS > | as search string in Google, so i...

This is a request to increase MAX_NUM_DLLS in Rdynload.c in from 100 to 500. On line 131 of Rdynload.c, changing #define MAX_NUM_DLLS 100 to #define MAX_NUM_DLLS 500 In development of the mlr package, there have been several episodes in the past where we have had to break up unit tests because of the "maximum number of DLLs reached" error. This error has been an inconvenience that