Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "kostadinov".
2017 Aug 06
3
deprecation of UsePrivilegeSeparation breaks container use cases
Hello,
there are emerging container services that restrict regular users to
launch containers under some random uid for security reasons. If such
user needs sshd in their container, they need to turn off
`UsePrivilegeSeparation` so that sshd is executed as the current uid
and not `root`.
I understand that privilege separation [1] is more than changing the
process uid. On the other hand, it is
2011 Feb 13
2
Removing elements from a vector matching a criteria, BUG in which() function
Dear all,
I found a bug in the which() function.
When trying to remove elements with the which function,
if the criteria is not matched, numeric(0) is returned instead of the
array itself.
This is very weird.
> a = c(1,2,3,4,5)
> a[!a==6]
[1] 1 2 3 4 5
> a[-which(a==6)]
numeric(0)
> a[-which(a==5)]
[1] 1 2 3 4
> a[!a==5]
[1] 1 2 3 4
Is this correct? I believe this is a bug.
I
2006 May 26
1
Re: NUT mustek UPS driver (fwd)
...name_for_your_ups" (this without
starting NUT normally - i.e. without upsd, upsmon, etc) and send me
the output?
The output should help me figure out why you are getting data stale
(may be a timing issue).
Also, can you point me to the mustek product page for that UPS?
On 5/26/06, Alexander Kostadinov <avalon@dolphin-3.bg> wrote:
> Hallo again. I just wrote you and just found the Megatec protocol page.
> 2.31 must be the cell power but I think here it is too high (should be
> 1....). And how could I know the nominal,min and max power?
> Just to say I tried the latest 2.1 code a...
2015 Mar 18
6
Event Triggers on 2.5 beta1
> On 17 Mar 2015, at 14:26, Thomas B. R?cker <thomas at ruecker.fi> wrote:
>
> Yeah, it's a funny place holder. BTW, if anyone has ideas how to name
> that tag, we're open to suggestions.
How about <event-definitions> or <event-bindings>?
BTW, I?m still stuck trying to figure out what the available values are for the ?trigger? attribute. Ideally I?d like to
2007 May 16
1
Re: drop silently locally generated packets
Hi. I want to drop silently locally generated packets on a specific
interface. I tried 2 approaches:
tc qdisc del dev eth0 root
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb
tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: proto ip u32 match ip dst 10.10.10.1 flowid
1:1 police conform-exceed drop/drop
tc qdisc del dev eth0 root
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio bands 2 priomap 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0