search for: koschikode

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20 matches for "koschikode".

2020 Apr 02
1
Disable Dovecot LDA
...go directly to LMTP/LDA but I need two instances of Postfix in that case? Regarding your second question - it is required to be complaint with Direct Trust. Thanks, Adam ?On 4/2/20, 3:07 PM, "dovecot on behalf of Juri Haberland" <dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org on behalf of juri at koschikode.com> wrote: On 02/04/2020 15:18, Adam Raszkiewicz wrote: > Desired flow looks like: > > Dovecot ---------------------> Postfix --> Relay Server -? > Dovecot <-- LMTP/LDA <-- Postfix <---------------------? This mail flow cannot work with...
2003 Feb 06
6
Why does old kernel boot when new kernel installed?
I thought I'd summarise this with a proper subject line: 1. We used up2date to upgrade the kernel of a 7.2 machine that is doing far too much journalling (kjournald at 50% CPU+ often). 2. It installed fine, but when we reboot - GRUB only shows the old 2.4.7-10 although there are 3 kernels listed in grub.conf My Question is "How can we select booting to 2.4.18-24.7 when GRUB lonly lists
2020 Mar 12
0
lmtp and recipient_delimiter
> Le 11 mars 2020 ? 19:32, Juri Haberland <juri at koschikode.com> a ?crit : > > Hi list, > > I have a small problem with recipient_delimiters contained in usernames. > Recently I have extended recipient_delimiter from "+" to "+-" in both > Postfix and Dovecot (using lmtp) and now any user that have a '-' in...
2002 Jun 27
2
shared storage: rw on one node and ro on second node
Hi list, I recently came up with the need for the storage, shared between two nodes; one would do all the r/w to it and the other would mount it r/o and serve it to the client boxen. I want to use ext3 in this setup, since i trust it the most. My question is: is this possible? How would the r/o node handle the metadata updates that the r/w node would be doing? If there is some fundamental
2001 Nov 23
4
ext3 patch for 2.4.15
Hi, this site: http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/ says "Forbidden" when I try to access .... , where can I download the ext3 patch for 2.4.15 ? Thank you Nikolai
2001 Sep 17
2
ext3 and 2.4.x
Hi there, I am trying to find information about running ext3 with 2.4.x From the looks of the list it seems to be supported however I could only find a patch for 2.2.19, if it is somewhere in the 2.4.x kernel I can't find where. Can someone please point me in the right direction? Thank you Ken
2001 Jul 06
0
mount root fs as ext2 with ext3 enabled kernel
...as looking for a kernel option to mount the root fs (/) as ext2 with an ext3 enabled kernel. I searched the list archive and I'm not sure whether rootflags=noload is the right option... Can someone give me a hint? I'm using 2.4.6-pre5 with ext3-0.0.8. TIA Juri -- Juri Haberland <juri@koschikode.com>
2020 Apr 19
2
Dovecot and thunderbird authentication issue?
Hello, I'm using Dovecot 2.2, Postfix 3.5, and am atempting to get the latest version of Thunderbird to work. I tried account autoconfig which did not work, so I had to manually enter information and correct other information. On my server dovecot supports plane and login authentication methods but only over starttls i've got a letsencrypt certificate. My thunderbird configuration looks
2020 Mar 11
2
lmtp and recipient_delimiter
Hi list, I have a small problem with recipient_delimiters contained in usernames. Recently I have extended recipient_delimiter from "+" to "+-" in both Postfix and Dovecot (using lmtp) and now any user that have a '-' in it's username can't receive mail anymore, because lmtp truncates the localpart after the '-' and of course can't find the first
2003 Mar 13
6
Updated 2.4 htree patches available for 2.4.21-pre5
There's a new set of ext2/3 patches for 2.4.21-pre5 available at: http://thunk.org/tytso/linux/extfs-2.4-update/extfs-update-2.4.21pre5-2 and in broken out form at: http://thunk.org/tytso/linux/extfs-2.4-update/broken-out-2.4.21pre5-2 New to this patch set include: * A kludge to help htree work well with Linux's NFS implementation * Allow the orlov allocator to be disabled via a
2002 Oct 26
3
How come fsck still kicks in and reports major errors with Ext3?
Greetings. Total newbie with Ext3. I selected when I upgraded my system to RH7.2. I upgraded my system again to RH8.0. Here is some info: [root@world root]# cat /proc/mounts rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0 /dev/root / ext3 rw 0 0 /proc /proc proc rw 0 0 usbdevfs /proc/bus/usb usbdevfs rw 0 0 none /dev/shm tmpfs rw 0 0 none /dev/pts devpts rw 0 0 /dev/hdd1 /mnt/genericdata1 ext2 rw 0 0 Ok, so
2020 Apr 02
3
Disable Dovecot LDA
Desired flow looks like: Dovecot ---------------------> Postfix --> Relay Server -? Dovecot <-- LMTP/LDA <-- Postfix <---------------------? Top part of that flow works fine - a message will get to the relay server and it will be send back to the postfix for a local delivery but then it will start to loop back to the relay server instead hand over to LMTP/LDA. For some reason
2020 Mar 15
3
lmtp and recipient_delimiter
On 12/03/2020 08:04, Jean-Daniel wrote: > > >> Le 11 mars 2020 ? 19:32, Juri Haberland <juri at koschikode.com> a ?crit : >> >> Hi list, >> >> I have a small problem with recipient_delimiters contained in usernames. >> Recently I have extended recipient_delimiter from "+" to "+-" in both >> Postfix and Dovecot (using lmtp) and now any user tha...
2017 Feb 09
0
Messages on this list are often marked as spam.
On 09.02.2017 12:13, Steven Mainor wrote: > Well for other mailing lists I have noticed that a lot of lists add text to the body or subject saying what list the email is from which would cause the signature not to match. > > But the dovecot list doesn't do that so that's why I found it strange that so many emails fail dkim. But it uses MimeDel, presumably to delete the HTML part
2020 Mar 15
2
lmtp and recipient_delimiter
On 15/03/2020 20:26, Peter wrote: > Poorly documented, imo, but you want lmtp_save_to_detail_mailbox = yes: Thanks, tried it, but no, that's not what I want and it doesn't help in my case. To recap: If I set recipient_delimiter to "+-" (or "-" alone), having a user named "foo-bar" won't work anymore, because Dovecot always tries to deliver to user
2020 Apr 02
0
Disable Dovecot LDA
On 02/04/2020 15:18, Adam Raszkiewicz wrote: > Desired flow looks like: > > Dovecot ---------------------> Postfix --> Relay Server -? > Dovecot <-- LMTP/LDA <-- Postfix <---------------------? This mail flow cannot work with one Postfix instance. Either Postfix knows that "localdomain.com" is local and should be delivered to the LDA, in which case it
2020 Apr 20
0
Dovecot and thunderbird authentication issue?
On 19.04.20 23:44, David Mehler wrote: > I'm using Dovecot 2.2, Postfix 3.5, and am atempting to get the latest > version of Thunderbird to work. I tried account autoconfig which did > not work, so I had to manually enter information and correct other > information. On my server dovecot supports plane and login > authentication methods but only over starttls i've got a
2003 Mar 05
1
Re: re problems with ext3 well if think it is
Simon May wrote: > Hi I'm hoping you maybe able to help > I have late last year converted all my machines to ext3 no problems > now I have one machine crashing once every 4 / 5 days > I have used a crash dump and see the following > > <0>Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c:589: > "handle->h_buffer_credits > 0" > >
2020 Mar 15
2
lmtp and recipient_delimiter
On 15/03/2020 21:26, GMX Account wrote: > have a look at this: > > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#recipient_delimiter > > [...]When the recipient_delimiter [1] set contains multiple characters > (Postfix 2.11 and later), a user name or .forward file name is > separated from its extension by the first character that matches the > recipient_delimiter [1] set.[...]
2019 Feb 09
8
offtopic: rant about thoughtless enabling DMARC checks [was: Re: Bounces?]
On 09/02/2019 10:44, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: > For some reason mailman failed to "munge from" for senders with dmarc policy ;( > > It's now configured to always munge to avoid this again. I'd say, let Mailman throw all people off the list that have enabled DMARC checking without using exceptions for the lists they are on. It's a known fact that DMARC does not