search for: kornienko

Ping. On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:42 AM, Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com>wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk>wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Jul 26, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Chris Lattn...

Ping. On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com>wrote: > Ping. > > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:42 AM, Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com>wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk>wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:2...

...hon.org/dev/library/argparse.html> in a script and be able to test this script. This requires Python 2.7. This version has been around since 2010, and afaiu, is available on all modern platforms. Is there any reason not to change minimum required version of Python to 2.7? -- Regards, Alexander Kornienko -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140626/d229512d/attachment.html>

...u, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Jul 26, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> >> > <dropping llvm-commits> >> > >> > On Jul 2, 2012, at 9:59 AM, Alexander Kornienko wrote: >> > >> >> Hi llvmdev, llvm-commits, >> >> >> >> There was a discussion on this topic a while ago, and now I've decided >> to make a formal proposal and post it here. >> > >> > I missed the earlier discussion, so I'...

This is Chris' call to make, imo. -j On Aug 22, 2012, at 3:59 PM, Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com> wrote: > Ping. > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com> wrote: > Ping. > > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:42 AM, Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:02 A...

...nks, > Tanya > > > On Feb 14, 2019, at 9:50 AM, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > > Yes, I am working on it. The sub-projects are still having issues but the > other documentation has been fixed. > > -Tanya > > On Feb 14, 2019, at 3:53 AM, Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com> > wrote: > > Tanya, friendly ping. > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 3:21 PM Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Tanya, >> >> Last time I noticed a problem with clang-tools-extra docs you could help >>...

Thanks, I fixed the typo with Xenial. I don't know if I want to bring back llvm-jenkins.d.n again yet. if people see an interest in it, why not :) Le 27/04/2016 à 13:06, Alexander Kornienko a écrit : > ... and http://llvm-jenkins.debian.net/ seems to be down. Sorry for > bugging you with all of this, and thanks for fixing the > clang-modernize thingy so quickly! > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Alexander Kornienko > <alexfh at google.com <mailto:alexfh...

Yes, I am working on it. The sub-projects are still having issues but the other documentation has been fixed. -Tanya > On Feb 14, 2019, at 3:53 AM, Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com> wrote: > > Tanya, friendly ping. > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 3:21 PM Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com <mailto:alexfh at google.com>> wrote: > Hi Tanya, > > Last time I noticed a problem with clang-tools-extra docs you could h...

...5.10) seems wrong (should be 16.04 LTS). On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre at debian.org> wrote: > Hello > > Indeed, this package no longer exists. I removed it from llvm.org/apt/ > > Thanks, > Sylvestre > > Le 27/04/2016 à 12:23, Alexander Kornienko a écrit : > > Adding Sylvestre, who should know how to fix that. > > > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Nick Wiggill <nick.wiggill at gmail.com > <mailto:nick.wiggill at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > Thanks for your replies, gentlemen. I'm in goo...

...{ } while (0) **#endif* After this we can start using *-Wimplicit-fallthrough*. Please express your opinions on this proposal. I'm also ready to provide diffs for marking all fall-through locations with the LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro, if this proposal gets approval. -- Best regards, Alexander Kornienko -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120702/e3b7093a/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: fallthrough-bugs-llvm.diff Type: applica...

...org/apt/>, it should not be suggested then > to "apt-get install [..etc..] clang-modernize-3.8 [..etc..]" (see under > "Install > (qualification branch)"). Should probably be updated - thank you Benjamin > for asking. > > On 26 April 2016 at 18:28, Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com> wrote: > >> The docs are in a good shape in this regard: >> >> http://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-modernize.html >> >> http://llvm.org/releases/3.8.0/tools/clang/tools/extra/docs/clang-modernize.html >> >> >> Apparently,...

...ity macro for *[[clang::fallthrough]]*attribute (which is also implemented, of course). I only need an approval from community to add this macro and replace comment-only fall-through annotations with the *LLVM_FALLTHROUGH;* macro. > -Cameron > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com>wrote: > >> Is anyone interested in introducing fall-through annotations and the >> related diagnostic in LLVM/Clang code? >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com>wrote: >> >>&g...

Hi Tanya, Last time I noticed a problem with clang-tools-extra docs you could help solving them. If someone else is taking care of this part of the infrastructure now, please redirect appropriately. It looks like docs generated from rst (for LLVM, Clang and clang-tools-extra) don't get updated at the moment. They stopped updating somewhere between r353327

On Jul 26, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > <dropping llvm-commits> > > On Jul 2, 2012, at 9:59 AM, Alexander Kornienko wrote: > >> Hi llvmdev, llvm-commits, >> >> There was a discussion on this topic a while ago, and now I've decided to make a formal proposal and post it here. > > I missed the earlier discussion, so I'm sorry for chiming in late. > >> I propose to add...

...ne for the input, I'm going to start splitting up the patch. I'll send out the non-mechanical parts separately. On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:03 PM Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Oct 31, 2018, at 2:24 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > > Alex Kornienko proposed enabling this warning back in 2012 here: > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2012-July/051386.html > > At the time, Chris Lattner said he didn't feel it was worth annotating > all of LLVM and Clang with a new macro to enable this warning. > > > FWIW, I forma...

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jul 26, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > > <dropping llvm-commits> > > > > On Jul 2, 2012, at 9:59 AM, Alexander Kornienko wrote: > > > >> Hi llvmdev, llvm-commits, > >> > >> There was a discussion on this topic a while ago, and now I've decided > to make a formal proposal and post it here. > > > > I missed the earlier discussion, so I'm sorry for chiming in late....

<dropping llvm-commits> On Jul 2, 2012, at 9:59 AM, Alexander Kornienko wrote: > Hi llvmdev, llvm-commits, > > There was a discussion on this topic a while ago, and now I've decided to make a formal proposal and post it here. I missed the earlier discussion, so I'm sorry for chiming in late. > I propose to add the LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro for spec...

...pt/cl::extrahelp objects so that the order of creation can be defined more explicitly (r161753). But I'm not sure this is a supported use-case. I've added a test for it (r161751), but it would be nice to make sure if it aligns well with the library design plans. -- Best regards, Alexander Kornienko -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120814/548c9ea1/attachment.html>

The docs are in a good shape in this regard: http://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-modernize.html http://llvm.org/releases/3.8.0/tools/clang/tools/extra/docs/clang-modernize.html Apparently, it doesn't make the fact more discoverable though. On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Benjamin Kramer via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > clang-modernize was folded into clang-tidy

...p; Clang (having the right compiler & libstdc++ installed), compared to the 3 minutes it typically takes to install any Python version on any Linux box, these limitations always strike me as silly. But I gave up on this fight some time ago. Eli > > On Jun 25, 2014, at 17:11, Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com> wrote: > > http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html currently mentions Python 2.5 as > a minimum required version. I'd like to use argparse > <https://docs.python.org/dev/library/argparse.html> in a script and be > able to test this script. This...