search for: kops

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 325 matches for "kops".

Did you mean: fops
2020 Jul 06
0
[PATCH v3 0/6] powerpc: queued spinlocks and rwlocks
On 7/6/20 12:35 AM, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > v3 is updated to use __pv_queued_spin_unlock, noticed by Waiman (thank you). > > Thanks, > Nick > > Nicholas Piggin (6): > powerpc/powernv: must include hvcall.h to get PAPR defines > powerpc/pseries: move some PAPR paravirt functions to their own file > powerpc: move spinlock implementation to simple_spinlock >
2020 Jul 07
6
[PATCH v3 0/6] powerpc: queued spinlocks and rwlocks
Excerpts from Waiman Long's message of July 7, 2020 4:39 am: > On 7/6/20 12:35 AM, Nicholas Piggin wrote: >> v3 is updated to use __pv_queued_spin_unlock, noticed by Waiman (thank you). >> >> Thanks, >> Nick >> >> Nicholas Piggin (6): >> powerpc/powernv: must include hvcall.h to get PAPR defines >> powerpc/pseries: move some PAPR
2020 Jul 07
6
[PATCH v3 0/6] powerpc: queued spinlocks and rwlocks
Excerpts from Waiman Long's message of July 7, 2020 4:39 am: > On 7/6/20 12:35 AM, Nicholas Piggin wrote: >> v3 is updated to use __pv_queued_spin_unlock, noticed by Waiman (thank you). >> >> Thanks, >> Nick >> >> Nicholas Piggin (6): >> powerpc/powernv: must include hvcall.h to get PAPR defines >> powerpc/pseries: move some PAPR
2020 Jul 06
13
[PATCH v3 0/6] powerpc: queued spinlocks and rwlocks
v3 is updated to use __pv_queued_spin_unlock, noticed by Waiman (thank you). Thanks, Nick Nicholas Piggin (6): powerpc/powernv: must include hvcall.h to get PAPR defines powerpc/pseries: move some PAPR paravirt functions to their own file powerpc: move spinlock implementation to simple_spinlock powerpc/64s: implement queued spinlocks and rwlocks powerpc/pseries: implement paravirt
2020 Jul 06
13
[PATCH v3 0/6] powerpc: queued spinlocks and rwlocks
v3 is updated to use __pv_queued_spin_unlock, noticed by Waiman (thank you). Thanks, Nick Nicholas Piggin (6): powerpc/powernv: must include hvcall.h to get PAPR defines powerpc/pseries: move some PAPR paravirt functions to their own file powerpc: move spinlock implementation to simple_spinlock powerpc/64s: implement queued spinlocks and rwlocks powerpc/pseries: implement paravirt
2016 Jul 27
4
man page
I would rather the maintainers would spend their time improving the application, and not worrying aobut the OP's hurt little open-sourced religious feelings. I use rsync to transfer pretty massive (wait for it) ADOBE PHOTOSHOP files around my LAN. Neener neener fucken neener. On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Karl O. Pinc <kop at meme.com> wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 14:56:07
2016 Jul 27
0
man page
I would agree. Plus he said this was something he did to help his wife. It is entirely possible that he runs a Samba server to assists a non-technical wife just like a corporate IT department would do. On 07/27/2016 02:26 PM, Tony Reed wrote: > I would rather the maintainers would spend their time improving the > application, and not worrying aobut the OP's hurt little open-sourced
2016 Aug 14
2
man page
I appreciate the parable of helping non-technical users (or, more precisely, users not keen on IT). As I understand, placement of software like Word or Photoshop servers this purpose. But both of them have decent open-source counterparts, and they are better fit for an rsync manual. Or, if from any reason proprietary software is preferred in this context (perhaps because it generates even more
2016 Jul 27
2
man page
Hi, I've found this in the man page for rsync: "To backup my wife’s home directory, which consists of large MS Word files and mail folders, I use a cron job that runs ...". I believe it's very inappropriate and inconsiderate to mention Microsoft products unless it's really necessary. I'm mostly concerned with the fact that this careless usage not only gives them more
2014 Jun 06
1
[Bug 10637] rsync --link-dest should break hard links when encountering "Too many links"
samba-bugs at samba.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10637 > > --- Comment #1 from Karl O. Pinc <kop at meme.com> 2014-05-28 19:05:04 UTC --- > Yum is also rsync happy. That's where our --link-dest backups always break due > to too many hard links. ---------- What would be "too many"? -- a few million? I have files in a test setup that
2013 Jul 09
3
Allow ipconfig to bring down interfaces
Hi, Attached and on the "ipconfig_down" branch at github (https://github.com/kpinc/klibc.git) you will find 4 patches which let ipconfig bring down interfaces. Please consider them for inclusion. Why do this? It's useful when the rootfs is crypted and is unlocked by supplying passwords over the network. In this case the initramfs brings up a network interface. It can be useful
2015 Jul 02
8
[Bug 11378] New: Please add a '--line-buffered' option to rsync to make logging/output more friendly with pipes/syslog/CI systems/etc.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11378 Bug ID: 11378 Summary: Please add a '--line-buffered' option to rsync to make logging/output more friendly with pipes/syslog/CI systems/etc. Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW
2012 Mar 25
1
link(2) EMLINK error behavior with --link-dest and --hard-links
Hi, I'm having a problem using --link-dest and --hard-links when the fs hits the hard link limit (link(2) returns EMLINK). Using rsync 3.0.7 an error is thrown and the target file is not created. Glancing at git head it _looks_ like things could now be a little nicer. Perhaps the target file is copied instead of hard linked when hardlinking fails -- I've not tested it. Anyway, the
2013 Feb 12
2
A --exclude-checksum option?
Hi, I use rsync with hardlinks for backup, once a week doing checksums to ensure there's no filesystem corruption in the backed-up data. I also use tmpwatch, or something similar, to clean up /tmp, it removes files that have not been accessed recently. (atime older than some configured limit). I backup /tmp because I throw stuff in tmp that I might possibly need again but don't want to
2016 May 05
3
Yet another filter question
I hate to say anything remotely negative to Wayne but... That wording from the man page makes almost no sense without the examples directly after it (and I have read it many times and know what it is saying). When I go all RTFM on this topic I usually tell them to 'man rsync', search for file-will-not-be-found and start reading from that line. Once you understand the broken and correct
2017 Jun 15
2
[Bug 12819] [PATCH] sync() on receiving side for data consistency
On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 13:23:44 +0000 just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12819 > > --- Comment #7 from Ben RUBSON <ben.rubson at gmail.com> --- > Note that my patch simply adds a sync() just after recv_files(), so > one sync() per connection, not per write operation. >
2016 Jul 28
2
man page
Nah, this is the first time I've posted here in years. Gennaly things just tick over with the application moving along in a nice straightforward manner, improvment upon improvement. Rsync is one of the mose important and usefu apps available for Linux and OS X (powered by APPLE!!!!); followed by ffmpeg and vlc (and Apache, I guess, but I don't do much of that anymore). The docs are very
2016 Mar 07
0
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #24 from Karl O. Pinc <kop at meme.com> --- On Sun, 06 Mar 2016 22:20:16 +0000 samba-bugs at samba.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 > > --- Comment #23 from dajoker at gmail.com --- > Looking for this capability prior to entering it as an enhancement > request myself, I found everything
2020 Feb 10
0
Updating of access times
Karl - thanks heaps! ( I think I was looking at an old man page, that doesn't show that option). Just what we need - thanks. Rob. ?On 10/2/20, 15:51, "Karl O. Pinc" <kop at karlpinc.com> wrote: On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 03:27:39 +0000 "Bell, Robert \(IM&T, Clayton\) via rsync" <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > We have a scenario where
2020 Mar 10
0
Encrypt destination file
Thank you so much. Regards, Dat Le ________________________________ From: Karl O. Pinc <kop at karlpinc.com> Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2020 5:33 PM To: Rainy Days via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> Cc: Rainy Days <tandatle1994 at hotmail.com> Subject: Re: Encrypt destination file On Sun, 8 Mar 2020 15:49:43 +0000 Rainy Days via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: