search for: kononenko

Hello So how did it happen that the only project which was a candidate for libJIT Summer of Code in GNU, with the same title got selected in LLVM? Does it mean that the same genius idea came to two minds? Thanks, Kirill -- http://code.google.com/p/libjit-linear-scan-register-allocator/

Dear R-helpers: I am interested in discretization methods for numerical attributes, as they are reported in the 'machine learning' community. For example, the work of Fayyad & Irani (IJCAI-93), Kononenko, entropy-based approaches, MDL principle, the C4.5 approach, etc. I am especially interested in those methods that take a factor as goal target into account for discretizing continuous-valued attributes. Is there an implementation of any one of those methods available in the many libraries ava...

...gal reason" try Java HotSpot. But not a 5 years old version, although even that should give you more objective results that you can understand what these benchmark mean in fact. Thanks, Kirill 2009/3/2 Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com>: > > On Mar 2, 2009, at 8:25 AM, Kirill Kononenko wrote: > >> Hello Dear LLVM Developers and Users > > Hi Kirill, > > Please talk to Nicholas about this, thanks! > > -Chris > >> >> >> I would like to complain about scientific inaccuracy of the paper >> http://hal.inria.fr/docs/00/35/45/77/PDF/R...

...pnet were merged in 0.7.4. Now that we all know pnet and libjit are two separate, alive, projects, we will stop refering to pnet only. The VMKit paper got rid of libjit references. As for the LLVM developer meeting presentation, there is no mention of libjit. End of the story. Nicolas Kirill Kononenko wrote: > Hi Chris, > > > Just in case that this information does not get corrupted I want to > point to the issue: > > > In http://llvm.org/devmtg/2008-08/Geoffray_VMKitProject.pdf it is on > page 21: "VMKit, Mono, PNet", Array bounds checks. > > In http:/...

...at we all know pnet and libjit are two separate, alive, projects, we will > stop refering to pnet only. The VMKit paper got rid of libjit references. As > for the LLVM developer meeting presentation, there is no mention of libjit. > > End of the story. > > Nicolas > > Kirill Kononenko wrote: >> >> Hi Chris, >> >> >> Just in case that this information does not get corrupted I want to >> point to the issue: >> >> >> In http://llvm.org/devmtg/2008-08/Geoffray_VMKitProject.pdf it is on >> page 21: "VMKit, Mono, PNet&qu...

On Mar 2, 2009, at 8:25 AM, Kirill Kononenko wrote: > Hello Dear LLVM Developers and Users Hi Kirill, Please talk to Nicholas about this, thanks! -Chris > > > I would like to complain about scientific inaccuracy of the paper > http://hal.inria.fr/docs/00/35/45/77/PDF/RR-6799.pdf written by > Nicolas Geoffray, Gaël Thoma...

Hello Dear LLVM Developers and Users I would like to complain about scientific inaccuracy of the paper http://hal.inria.fr/docs/00/35/45/77/PDF/RR-6799.pdf written by Nicolas Geoffray, Gaël Thomas, Charles Clément, Bertil Folliot, Gilles Muller and presentation done by Nicolas Geoffray on LLVM conference supported by Google: http://llvm.org/devmtg/2008-08/Geoffray_VMKitProject.pdf They provide

On Apr 20, 2009, at 12:42 PM, Kirill Kononenko wrote: > Dear all, > > > This new version of the paper at: > > http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/36/53/37/PDF/RR-6799.pdf > > got ride of libJIT. Now my question is the how scientific is this > research and research paper if instead of using libJIT and > Portabl...

Hi Chris How does this has nothing to do with llvm? Is not the VMKit project an official part of LLVM? Thanks, Kirill -- http://code.google.com/p/libjit-linear-scan-register-allocator/

Hi, everyone, This is a little silly, but I cant figure out the algorithm behind lm.fit function used in the context of promax rotation algorithm: The promax function is: promax <- function(x, m = 4) { if(ncol(x) < 2) return(x) dn <- dimnames(x) xx <- varimax(x) x <- xx$loadings Q <- x * abs(x)^(m-1) U <- lm.fit(x, Q)$coefficients d <-