search for: kongy

...23.8788 With patch reverted: 22.5229 That's around 6% regression. Detailed JSON file is at http://paste.debian.net/113238, http://paste.debian.net/113239 -Yi On 1 August 2014 21:56, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Yi Kong <kongy.dev at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> However the multithreading stuff is real regression and I'm able to >> reproduce same regression on my local build bots. > > > Can you share a preprocessed input and commandline which reproduces this > regression?

On 1 August 2014 21:33, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: >> Note, this patch is actually the smaller culprit, around 209801 there is >> another performance regression, but I have no idea if/where this is coming >> from or if this for some reason is a false positive. > > > I'm having to question the results on this bot. The range of commits

On 16 May 2014 18:08, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Yi Kong" <kongy.dev at gmail.com> >> To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>, "Renato Golin" <renato.golin at linaro.org>, "Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> >> Cc: "LLVM Dev" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> >> Sent: Friday, May 16, 2...

...iss some aspects of compiler optimization. For example frequent cache misses would have much smaller impact on the result if the processor goes to lower frequency during the stall period. Nonetheless it's definitely worth to try out. > > > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Yi Kong <kongy.dev at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 16 May 2014 18:08, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: >> > ----- Original Message ----- >> >> From: "Yi Kong" <kongy.dev at gmail.com> >> >> To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov&...

After some internal discussions, we concluded that moving non-memory-access and non-side-effect instructions around memory barrier intrinsics is fine in almost any typical situation. In the rare occasions where reordering is undesirable, the programmer should use inline asm instead. Thus I'm dropping this RFC. Thanks for your comments. -Yi

Could someone please assist me soonest. when i run asterisk with one X101P card and a S400P card asterisk will run but the card will not work.this is the message i get: [format_jpeg.so] => (JPEG (Joint Picture Experts Group) Image Format) == Registered format 'jpg' (JPEG (Joint Picture Experts Group)) [cdr_csv.so] => (Comma Separated Values CDR Backend) [cdr_mysql.so] =>

I got Python 2.7.3 Sounds right? On Fri Aug 08 2014 at 4:45:01 PM Yi Kong <kongy.dev at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jingyue, > > I've never seen this error before. It looks like something to do with > virtualenv. > > What do you get by running `~/mysandbox/bin/python --version`? > > -Yi > > On 8 August 2014 23:48, Jingyue Wu <jingyue at googl...

Hi all, The LLVM benchmarking system produces very noisy results even on quiet machines. One of the sources of inaccuracy is the timing tool we are using. Because it is a user-space tool, the OS can context switch it and we will get an outlier result. Perf stat uses SW_TASK_CLOCK counter in kernel to measure time, therefore more accurate. It also does not get context switched. I've

On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > On 21/05/2014 22:13, Yi Kong wrote: > >> On 20 May 2014 17:55, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >> >>> I set it to 2667.000 Mhz on parkas16. You can try if this improves >>> something. >>> >> >> I don't see any sign of improvement.

Hi all, I'm currently working on implementing ACLE extensions for ARM. There are some memory barrier intrinsics, i.e.__dsb and __isb that require the compiler not to reorder instructions around their corresponding built-in intrinsics(__builtin_arm_dsb, __builtin_arm_isb), including non-memory-access instructions.[1] This is currently not possible. It is sometimes useful to prevent the

On 2 August 2014 00:40, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > If memory serves me well (it doesn't), these are the list of things we > agreed on making, and their progress: > > 1. Performance-specific test-suite: a group of specific benchmarks > that should be tracked with the LNT infrastructure. Hal proposed to > look at this, but other people helped

Hi, I followed the instructions on http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/quickstart.html, and got stuck on installation Step 4. ~/mysandbox/bin/python ~/lnt/setup.py develop said running develop error: None and returned error code 1. The lnt binary wasn't installed anywhere. Any clue? Thanks much, Jingyue -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

i am using RH8.0,when i try to load the zaptel driver using "modprobe zaptel" it give an error "cant locate module zaptel" also when i do "modprobe wcfxo" it gives "can't locate module wcfxo" when i try compilling zaptel i get "make ***[zaptel.0] Error 1 what am i doing wrong someone please help! -- Augustine GDES 18b oshin road,kongi

Hi, Is anyone here using the SuperMicro SuperServer 6014P-8R with Asterisk? I'm especially interested if you've used it with a TE405P or TE410P. Cheers Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: tony@softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: tony@mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org

dear Hackers, i have a voicetronix Openswitch card, and i have been finding it very dificult to get it to work with asterisk. i intend to connect 8 ports to the PSTN and 4 as station ports. problem 1: On running asterisk all i get at first i get : event[9=>[11] station OFF hook] on vpb/1-12 even [12=>[11] loop drop on vpb/1-12 event [12=>[11] Tone detect:GRUNT event [2=>[11] Dial

I am always getting multiple PCI Master Abort messages when I try to plug in a second TDM400P. I have asked this question before, but I nothing really solved my problem and I just put it on the back burner for a while. I am at a point where this is a crucial issue. I have read that the Zaptel devices share an IRQ, is this causing the problem? Is there a way that I can manually change the IRQs of

hello all, I still experience the random off-hook on my fxo cxhannels, i am using a zplex-10b channel bank. which does not allow me to call out. The situation still persists...this is what i have in the zapata.conf [channels] context=internal context=incoming context=default usecallerid=no usecallwaiting=no signalling=fxs_ks channel=1-8 signalling=fxo_ks channel=16-24 but i still have the the

...nds on Linux perf and schedtool. I'm running tests on ARM Cortex boards to verify the improvements. Please also check if this works on your system. Thanks, Yi On 16 May 2014 20:51, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Yi Kong <kongy.dev at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 16 May 2014 18:40, "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: >> > >> > Why not use the cycle count which perf exposes from hardware? That would >> > seem even better to me, but data would be better...

Hi! I have this configuration: SIP client A <-> NAT box A (real external IP) <-> Asterisk server (real IP) <-> (real external IP) NAT box B <-> SIP client B The echo test form any of the clients to the asterisk server is working just fine, even without canreinvite=no. When I try to call from SIP client A to B, wihtout the canreinvite=no in the sip.conf, the call

hello, I have been using asterisk now for about 2 years now on a RH8.0 it is our main call gateway. I have on the box 3 T1 TDM cards connected to 2 Rhino channel banks (FXS) and 1 CAC Access bank I (FXO) with so many softphones and ATA 186s. It has been working good till today some few hours ago. i just discovered that there were no dialtone on the phones. Asterisk did not spit out any error, it