search for: kongi

Hi Chandler, On an x86 system, for ToT LLVM: With "Remove support for LLVM runtime multithreading": 23.8788 With patch reverted: 22.5229 That's around 6% regression. Detailed JSON file is at http://paste.debian.net/113238, http://paste.debian.net/113239 -Yi On 1 August 2014 21:56, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 1:47 PM,

On 1 August 2014 21:33, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: >> Note, this patch is actually the smaller culprit, around 209801 there is >> another performance regression, but I have no idea if/where this is coming >> from or if this for some reason is a false positive. > > > I'm having to question the results on this bot. The range of commits

On 16 May 2014 18:08, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Yi Kong" <kongy.dev at gmail.com> >> To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>, "Renato Golin" <renato.golin at linaro.org>, "Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> >> Cc: "LLVM Dev" <llvmdev at

On 16 May 2014 18:40, "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > Why not use the cycle count which perf exposes from hardware? That would seem even better to me, but data would be better. =] That's an interesting idea. However I'm concerned if that will miss some aspects of compiler optimization. For example frequent cache misses would have much smaller

After some internal discussions, we concluded that moving non-memory-access and non-side-effect instructions around memory barrier intrinsics is fine in almost any typical situation. In the rare occasions where reordering is undesirable, the programmer should use inline asm instead. Thus I'm dropping this RFC. Thanks for your comments. -Yi

...Channel Driver) == OpenH323 Channel Ready (v0.5.1) [skipping chan_zap.so] Asterisk Ready. *CLI> As you will see in the last line "skipping chan_zap.so" before now it gave me the following error message -- Olaifa Augustine General Data Engineering Services Ltd 18b oshin road,kongi bodija p.o.box 29460, secretariate, ibadan. tel:- 234-2-8105156

I got Python 2.7.3 Sounds right? On Fri Aug 08 2014 at 4:45:01 PM Yi Kong <kongy.dev at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jingyue, > > I've never seen this error before. It looks like something to do with > virtualenv. > > What do you get by running `~/mysandbox/bin/python --version`? > > -Yi > > On 8 August 2014 23:48, Jingyue Wu <jingyue at google.com>

Hi all, The LLVM benchmarking system produces very noisy results even on quiet machines. One of the sources of inaccuracy is the timing tool we are using. Because it is a user-space tool, the OS can context switch it and we will get an outlier result. Perf stat uses SW_TASK_CLOCK counter in kernel to measure time, therefore more accurate. It also does not get context switched. I've

On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > On 21/05/2014 22:13, Yi Kong wrote: > >> On 20 May 2014 17:55, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >> >>> I set it to 2667.000 Mhz on parkas16. You can try if this improves >>> something. >>> >> >> I don't see any sign of improvement.

Hi all, I'm currently working on implementing ACLE extensions for ARM. There are some memory barrier intrinsics, i.e.__dsb and __isb that require the compiler not to reorder instructions around their corresponding built-in intrinsics(__builtin_arm_dsb, __builtin_arm_isb), including non-memory-access instructions.[1] This is currently not possible. It is sometimes useful to prevent the

On 2 August 2014 00:40, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > If memory serves me well (it doesn't), these are the list of things we > agreed on making, and their progress: > > 1. Performance-specific test-suite: a group of specific benchmarks > that should be tracked with the LNT infrastructure. Hal proposed to > look at this, but other people helped

Hi, I followed the instructions on http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/quickstart.html, and got stuck on installation Step 4. ~/mysandbox/bin/python ~/lnt/setup.py develop said running develop error: None and returned error code 1. The lnt binary wasn't installed anywhere. Any clue? Thanks much, Jingyue -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

...give an error "cant locate module zaptel" also when i do "modprobe wcfxo" it gives "can't locate module wcfxo" when i try compilling zaptel i get "make ***[zaptel.0] Error 1 what am i doing wrong someone please help! -- Augustine GDES 18b oshin road,kongi bodija p.o.box 29460, secretariate, ibadan.

Hi, Is anyone here using the SuperMicro SuperServer 6014P-8R with Asterisk? I'm especially interested if you've used it with a TE405P or TE410P. Cheers Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: tony@softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: tony@mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org

...C,437,100,2000 but there was no change. Is there anyone out there that has got the voicetronix Openswitch working? i would like to share the working configs, and learn how to get rid of the Tone Detect : Grunt regards -- Olaifa Augustine General Data Engineering Services Ltd 18b oshin road,kongi bodija p.o.box 29460, secretariate, ibadan. tel:- 234-2-8105156

I am always getting multiple PCI Master Abort messages when I try to plug in a second TDM400P. I have asked this question before, but I nothing really solved my problem and I just put it on the back burner for a while. I am at a point where this is a crucial issue. I have read that the Zaptel devices share an IRQ, is this causing the problem? Is there a way that I can manually change the IRQs of

...> > tel:- 234-2-8105156 > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > -- Olaifa Augustine General Data Engineering Services Ltd 18b oshin road,kongi bodija p.o.box 29460, secretariate, ibadan. tel:- 234-2-8105156 _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

I've set up a public LNT server to show the result of perf stat. There is a huge improvement compared with timeit tool. http://parkas16.inria.fr:8000/ Patch is updated to pin the process to a single core, the readings are even more accurate. It's hard coded to run everything on core 0, so don't run parallel testing with it for now. The tool now depends on Linux perf and schedtool.

Hi! I have this configuration: SIP client A <-> NAT box A (real external IP) <-> Asterisk server (real IP) <-> (real external IP) NAT box B <-> SIP client B The echo test form any of the clients to the asterisk server is working just fine, even without canreinvite=no. When I try to call from SIP client A to B, wihtout the canreinvite=no in the sip.conf, the call

...sterisk prompt (*CLI>). when i do "asterisk -vr" from another machine or terminal it just stays there and does not get to the prompt and all the phones still do not have tone. Any suggestions please! Regards -- Olaifa Augustine General Data Engineering Services Ltd 18b oshin road,kongi bodija p.o.box 29460, secretariate, ibadan. tel:- 234-2-8105156