search for: koncevi

>>>>> Karolis Koncevi?ius writes: > But this might require a more detailed investigation. For example I > just noticed that even with the patch `@` is still not listed in > .S3_methods_table(). Afaict base does not register any methods for @ or @<- ? -k > KK. >> On Apr 29, 2023, at 4:44 PM, Kar...

But this might require a more detailed investigation. For example I just noticed that even with the patch `@` is still not listed in .S3_methods_table(). KK. > On Apr 29, 2023, at 4:44 PM, Karolis Koncevi?ius <karolis.koncevicius at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello Kurt, > > With r84341 it now works on my side. > > Warm regards, > Karolis K. > >> On Apr 29, 2023, at 1:24 PM, Kurt Hornik <Kurt.Hornik at wu.ac.at> wrote: >> >>>>>>> K...

Hello Kurt, With r84341 it now works on my side. Warm regards, Karolis K. > On Apr 29, 2023, at 1:24 PM, Kurt Hornik <Kurt.Hornik at wu.ac.at> wrote: > >>>>>> Karolis Koncevi?ius writes: > > Can you pls try again with r84341 or later? > > Best > -k > >> A more concrete example in order to correct my vague messages below. >> Writing an R package that uses `@` and `@<-` as S3 generics. Line from manual pages in .Rd files: > >>...

>>>>> Karolis Koncevi?ius writes: Can you pls try again with r84341 or later? Best -k > A more concrete example in order to correct my vague messages below. > Writing an R package that uses `@` and `@<-` as S3 generics. Line from manual pages in .Rd files: > \method{@}{newclass}(object, name) <- v...

...ls:::.S3_method_markup_regexp and not finding `@` as a valid for S3. This error is gone if we adjust tools:::.S3_method_markup_regexp to pass for ?@? by adding ?\\@? to regexp. Please note that this now is not dependant on using or not using roxygen2 KK. > On Apr 29, 2023, at 12:53 AM, Karolis Koncevi?ius <karolis.koncevicius at gmail.com> wrote: > > Thank you for such a quick reply, Gabriel, > > I am not too familiar with the package tools, so cannot speak too confidently, but below is how I see the issue currently. > > The issue is not for external packages to rely o...

>>>>> Karolis Koncevi?ius >>>>> on Mon, 9 Dec 2019 23:43:36 +0200 writes: > So I tried adding Infinity support for all cases. > And it is (as could be expected) more complicated than I thought. "Of course !" Thank you, Karolis, in any case! > It is easy to add Inf...

...issues 2:4 are all related to machine precision, which is not the case - only 2nd issue is. Just wanted to draw this to your attention, in case you might have some feedback and guidelines about issues 3 and 4 as well. On 2019-12-07 21:59, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>> Karolis Koncevi?ius >>>>>> on Sat, 7 Dec 2019 20:55:36 +0200 writes: > > > Hello, > > Writing to share some things I've found about wilcox.test() that seem a > > a bit inconsistent. > > > 1. Inf values are not removed if paired=TRUE > > &...

...LSE, correct=FALSE) wilcox.test(rnorm(10), exact=TRUE, correct=FALSE) From all of these I am pretty sure the 1st one is likely unintended, so attaching a small patch to adjust it. Can also try patching others if consensus is reached that the behavioiur has to be modified. Kind regards, Karolis Koncevi?ius. --- Index: wilcox.test.R =================================================================== --- wilcox.test.R (revision 77540) +++ wilcox.test.R (working copy) @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ if(paired) { if(length(x) != length(y)) stop("'x' and ...

...ument. > > I do not know whether R-core feels this is something packages/users should be able to do; both decisions strike me as possible, to be honest, depending on details I don't know and/or am not privy to. > > Best, > ~G > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 1:49?PM Karolis Koncevi?ius <karolis.koncevicius at gmail.com <mailto:karolis.koncevicius at gmail.com>> wrote: >> This issue might go deeper - I was not successful in passing R CMD checks for the usage files. R CMD check kept showing errors for `@` declarations, even thou they were identical to `$` decl...

>>>>> Martin Maechler >>>>> on Thu, 12 Dec 2019 17:20:47 +0100 writes: >>>>> Karolis Koncevi?ius >>>>> on Mon, 9 Dec 2019 23:43:36 +0200 writes: >> So I tried adding Infinity support for all cases. And it >> is (as could be expected) more complicated than I >> thought. > "Of course !" Thank you, Karolis, in any case!...

...y remove Infinity support from the paired=TRUE case. But going with the more desirable approach of adding Infinity support for non-paired cases - it is currently not clear to me what confidence intervals and pseudomedian should be. Specially when Infinities are on both sides. Regards, Karolis Koncevi?ius. On 2019-12-07 23:18, Karolis Koncevi?ius wrote: >Thank you for a fast response. Nice to see this mailing list being so >alive. > >Regarding Inf issue: I agree with your assessment that Inf should not >be removed. The code gave me an impression that Inf values were >inten...

...en maintainers' job to fix or document. I do not know whether R-core feels this is something packages/users should be able to do; both decisions strike me as possible, to be honest, depending on details I don't know and/or am not privy to. Best, ~G On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 1:49?PM Karolis Koncevi?ius < karolis.koncevicius at gmail.com> wrote: > This issue might go deeper - I was not successful in passing R CMD checks > for the usage files. R CMD check kept showing errors for `@` declarations, > even thou they were identical to `$` declarations (which passed fine). > >...

...cks for the usage files. R CMD check kept showing errors for `@` declarations, even thou they were identical to `$` declarations (which passed fine). Seems like the usage check functions are not prepared for `@` - also in tools:::.S3_method_markup_regexp > On Apr 28, 2023, at 10:34 PM, Karolis Koncevi?ius <karolis.koncevicius at gmail.com> wrote: > > I was building a package that uses the new generic @ and kept having errors with ?roxygen2? documentation. ?roxygen2? generated NAMESPACE added `@.newclass` as a newly exported function, not as a S3method. > > At first I thought...

...ouble.eps)), but it's delicate and somewhat subjective/problem-dependent. Example: options(digits=20) > unique(c(4,3,2)-c(3,2,1)) [1] 1 > unique(c(0.4,0.3,0.2)-c(0.3,0.2,0.1)) [1] 0.100000000000000033307 0.099999999999999977796 0.100000000000000005551 On 2019-12-07 1:55 p.m., Karolis Koncevi?ius wrote: > Hello, > > Writing to share some things I've found about wilcox.test() that seem a > a bit inconsistent. > > 1. Inf values are not removed if paired=TRUE > > # returns different results (Inf is removed): > wilcox.test(c(1,2,3,4), c(0,9,8,7)) > wilco...

>>>>> Karolis Koncevi?ius >>>>> on Sat, 7 Dec 2019 20:55:36 +0200 writes: > Hello, > Writing to share some things I've found about wilcox.test() that seem a > a bit inconsistent. > 1. Inf values are not removed if paired=TRUE > # returns different results (In...

...es that g is a factor: x <- x - tapply(x,g,median)[g] + if (all(x == 0)) + stop("data are essentially constant") a <- qnorm((1 + rank(abs(x)) / (n + 1)) / 2) STATISTIC <- sum(tapply(a, g, "sum")^2 / tapply(a, g, "length")) --- Karolis Koncevi?ius [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...hat should solve the issue by producing an error "data is essentially constant" - which is the same error message found in t-test under similar conditions. P.S. First time writing to this list. Read all the guides of posting, but sorry in advance if I still missed any rules. --- Karolis Koncevi?ius -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: patch.diff URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/attachments/20190619/0642547d/attachment.ksh>

...R. But after some investigation I found that ?roxygen2? is using tools:::.get_internal_S3_generis() to decide if the method should be exported as S3method or not. For some reason ?@<-? is listed in there, but ?@? is not. Am I missing some context, or is this an oversight? Kind regards, Karolis Koncevicius

Hello, I also want to report 2 missed cases of stringsAsFactors=TRUE in base: 1. grid.expand() still uses hard stringsAsFactors=TRUE in its arguments. 2. as.data.frame.table() also keeps factors after conversion from table. >>>>>> Duncan Murdoch >>>>>> on Sun, 12 Apr 2020 08:57:14 -0400 writes: > > > The NEWS for R 4.0.0 says "R now uses

Hello, I recently stumbled on an unusual behaviour of any() and all() and have been adviced from StackOverflow to share it here [1]. df1 <- data.frame(A=TRUE, B=FALSE) df2 <- data.frame(A=1, B=0) > any(df1) Error in FUN(X[[i]], ...): only defined on a data frame with all numeric variables > any(df2) [1] TRUE Warning message: In any(c(1,