search for: kolbasov

...printf ("ON-CPU times:\n"); printa ("%-18s %@u\n", @cpu); printf ("\nWait times:\n"); printa ("%-18s %@u\n", @sleeps); printf ("\nTotal times:\n"); printa ("%-18s %@u\n", @total); } Any comments/suggestions/objections? - Alexander Kolbasov http://blogs.sun.com/akolb

...- Are there any stability levels associated with specific fields of lwpsinfo_t for DTrace consumers? - What parts of the documentation are affected by this change other than the DTrace guide? - Is there any embedded DTrace knowledge of lwpsinfo_t fields other than in sched.d? __ Alex Kolbasov http://blogs.sun.com/akolb

HI there, I?ve discovered DTrace few days ago and I?m currently stuck on a cpu stats problem. I?m trying to poll the cpu_t.cpu_acct[] array to pull idle, system and user values. So, I made this little script: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ #!/usr/sbin/dtrace -s #pragma D option quiet this uint64_t start; this hrtime_t

I am trying to use dtrace to trace all sscanf calls. I am able to use pid provider for this. But my application forks off children at times to handle requests. Is there a way I can stop the child process immediately after it is started so that I can attach a pid provider to that and trace the scanf calls in it? I have tried using the "create" probe but that did not help.

i''m using the following probe to calculate how many bytes are being written by tcp write calls, by process and total: fbt:ip:tcp_output:entry { this->tcpout_size = msgdsize(args[1]); @tcpout_size[execname] = sum(this->tcpout_size); @tcpout_size["TOTAL_TCP_OUT"] = sum(this->tcpout_size); } I run this probe for N seconds. I suppose that if i get the

Hi Bryan, > Does that sit well with everyone? Seems fine to me. Just revisiting one of Dragan''s points, though (sorry if I missed the answer) - is there a reason for making this global (via a #pragma) rather than, say, simply providing two functions which print in the different orders? e.g. printa() for sort by sample, printak() for sort by key. My reason for wanting to do both in

Author: akolb Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 9d3008a3418986c9f79c8afb06bca932abb62b95 Log message: 6283577 cfgadm configure panic - NULL pointer (mmu_fsr) dereferenced in module "ip" Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/inet/ip/ip_squeue.c

This is from a discussion on opensolaris-tools that is somewhat relevant for DTrace community. I wrote a simple D script (http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/onnv/onnv_build/faster_builds/tools/dtrace/dirtrace.d) that collects data for each dmake process during the Solaris build. After that the data is post-processed by a Perl script

1. 566 squeue_enter(squeue_t *sqp, mblk_t *mp, mblk_t *tail, uint32_t cnt, Why cnt is declared as uint32_t (fixed size?) Why not just int or uint_t? 554 * squeue_enter() - enter squeue sqp with mblk mp (which can be 555 * a chain), while tail points to the end and cnt in number of 556 * mblks in the chain. It is not quite clear what is a tail (and why it is needed as well) 558 * For