Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "koehlerthilo".
2012 Apr 11
0
Speex Codec Delay Problem
...f you add the *decoder* lookahead time to the encoder
lookahead time you are already referencing, you will get the numbers
that you have calculated.
--John
On 4/11/2012 1:00 PM, speex-dev-request at xiph.org wrote:
> Message: 1
> Date: 10 Apr 2012 22:07:20 +0200
> From: Thilo K?hler<koehlerthilo at gmx.de>
> Subject: [Speex-dev] Speex Codec Delay Problem
> To: speex-dev at xiph.org
> Message-ID:<20120410200733.53EAF100D06 at fraxinus.osuosl.org>
>
> Hello All!
>
> SPEEX introduces an additional delay to the audio data,
> I found out by reverse enginiering (...
2012 Apr 04
0
First frame is fading in (?)
Hello!
I am encoding small snippets of audio (e.g. 100ms) that
contain important audio from the first sample till the last one.
(means they dont start/end silent).
Doing so raised a couple of questions I couldnt solve
by reading the docu/faq/internet search.
1. Does the "complexity" parameter influence only the
speed of the encoder or also the speed of the decoder?
(I need fast
2012 Apr 10
0
Speex Codec Delay Problem
Hello All!
SPEEX introduces an additional delay to the audio data,
I found out by reverse enginiering (it is NOT the lookahead time):
narrow band : delay = 200 - framesize + lookahead = 200 - 160 + 40 = 80
samples
wide band : delay = 400 - framesize + lookahead = 400 - 320 + 143 = 223
samples
uwide band : delay = 800 - framesize + lookahead = 800 - 640 + 349 = 509
samples
To get the